Jump to content

Ranji Trophy 2016/17


Bleed-Blue

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

and probably for the first time, Rishabh Pant is batting at less than 50 strike rate. He has a tough job tomorrow. Delhi needing 174, 4 wickets already lost. I think GG and Dhawan are only hurting Delhi by keep playing. Youngsters likes of Himmat and Dhruv Shorey would not have done worse than them.

if he gets 100 and wins it tomorrow...nothing like it
he is bound to debue for india either in odi or t20 series vs eng

Posted
9 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

and probably for the first time, Rishabh Pant is batting at less than 50 strike rate. He has a tough job tomorrow. Delhi needing 174, 4 wickets already lost. 

If Pant can adapt according to the need of  his team then nothing like it.

 

Delhi needs 139 runs more with 6 wickets left.

Posted
20 minutes ago, express bowling said:

If Pant can adapt according to the need of  his team then nothing like it.

 

Delhi needs 139 runs more with 6 wickets left.

If we need to see his keeping skills on tv, he has to win it :) . Also a hundred in a telecasted match will make it certain that he will debut in the ODI series vs Eng

Posted
2 hours ago, express bowling said:

If Pant can adapt according to the need of  his team then nothing like it.

 

Delhi needs 139 runs more with 6 wickets left.

Delhi require another 167 runs 

Posted
2 hours ago, rkt.india said:

and probably for the first time, Rishabh Pant is batting at less than 50 strike rate. He has a tough job tomorrow. Delhi needing 174, 4 wickets already lost. I think GG and Dhawan are only hurting Delhi by keep playing. Youngsters likes of Himmat and Dhruv Shorey would not have done worse than them.

Nitish Rana has also been dissappointing

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Bleed-Blue said:

Nitish Rana has also been dissappointing

yeah this season he could not kick on. actually if you exclude Pant, none of the Delhi batsman average more than 43. Milind kumar averages 43, 2nd highest run getter with less than half the runs of Pant. This is the biggest reason why Pant has been so impressive. Nitish Rana has one 100, not 50 this season. but he is still someone to keep an eye on. He has the game to do well in all formats. 

Edited by rkt.india
Posted
6 minutes ago, express bowling said:

rkt.india

 

Do you have any idea what  Md.Shami's actual age could be  ?

No, but add at least 2 years in most cases.

Posted
3 minutes ago, rkt.india said:

No, but add at least 2 years in most cases.

2 years is still ok....he would still be just 28.  I hope it is not more.

 

His  original coach says that he saw a 15 year old Shami bowl for the first time in 2005...but his statement may not be absolutely authentic.

 

I don't think he played any U19  ( that would have made it easier to determine his rough age )  and was chosen for the Bengal  U22 team around 2007 or 2008.

Posted
26 minutes ago, express bowling said:

2 years is still ok....he would still be just 28.  I hope it is not more.

 

His  original coach says that he saw a 15 year old Shami bowl for the first time in 2005...but his statement may not be absolutely authentic.

 

I don't think he played any U19  ( that would have made it easier to determine his rough age )  and was chosen for the Bengal  U22 team around 2007 or 2008.

I maybe wrong but I feel Shami is in his early 30s.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Mosher said:

I maybe wrong but I feel Shami is in his early 30s.

He does look like that....I am just hoping that he is one of those older looking guys.       :p:

 

The fact that he has added  a bit of pace in 2016  gives further hope....is it possible for a 31 year old to actually add pace  ?

Posted (edited)

Lets assume early 30s and he has couple years more in Intl cricket before his body breaks down.

So, let's find others quickly. Shami is CERTAINLY not 20s, he is early 30s.

Edited by fineleg
Posted
15 minutes ago, fineleg said:

Lets assume early 30s and he has couple years more in Intl cricket before his body breaks down.

So, let's find others quickly. Shami is CERTAINLY not 20s, he is early 30s.

 

Nowadays, pacers are bowling quick till 35, unless they have had  long careers before that, like Anderson.

 

Shami has played only 22 tests, 47 ODIs and 18 other FC matches....so hasn't played much.

Posted
3 minutes ago, fineleg said:

ye but shami is  fragile, hope he plays till 35 36

I am aware of only one major injury to his knee, which resulted in an operation and a 12 month layoff.

 

Small niggles happen to every fast bowler 

Posted
1 hour ago, express bowling said:

He does look like that....I am just hoping that he is one of those older looking guys.       :p:

 

The fact that he has added  a bit of pace in 2016  gives further hope....is it possible for a 31 year old to actually add pace  ?

Shami is looking a lot more fitter these days and the shorter strides in his run-up has resulted in a much smoother action and increase in pace. Hope he continues to bowl this way for 3 more years atleast.

Posted
1 hour ago, express bowling said:

He does look like that....I am just hoping that he is one of those older looking guys.       :p:

 

The fact that he has added  a bit of pace in 2016  gives further hope....is it possible for a 31 year old to actually add pace  ?

I do think that he is in the early 30s. In terms of pace, I think that Wahab went from being fast-medium to fast quite late in his life, but his pace is erratic... sometimes low 130s, sometimes high 140s.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...