Tibarn Posted October 12, 2016 Posted October 12, 2016 Hmm... PM says Jai Shri Ram, and apparently India loses its secular credentials. Hinduism is against secularism. This "brave" journalist declares Rama to be a myth, I wonder if she would agree if the PM were to ridicule the book of peace?
Tibarn Posted October 15, 2016 Posted October 15, 2016 (edited) http://www.opindia.com/2016/10/the-hindu-blames-hindu-groups-only-for-a-conference-stopped-by-various-groups/ Quote So this is how it happened: A rather unknown atheist event came into the knowledge of locals after media coverage Locals belonging to various religious and political groups opposed the event The event was cancelled, but a small gathering of atheists still took place And this is how The Hindu reported it: Why only blame Hindus for an issue that numerous religious groups took part in? Where was the supposed attack? Edited October 15, 2016 by Tibarn
Tibarn Posted October 16, 2016 Posted October 16, 2016 Two more incidents involving the neutral media yesterday and one piece of news: 1) Donald Trump had a rally for Hindu-American Republicans in NJ yesterday. NDTV based neutral journo Sreenivasan Jain interviews Trump, and Trump says he loves Hindus. Jain proceeds to ask about Muslims and Trump responds that he loves Indians in general. I'm not sure why someone would ask about Muslims at a Hindu-American event, seems irrelevant. 2) Barkha Dutt at a panel on Journalism at Brown University in Rhode Island complains that social media is setting the agenda now. Why does setting the agenda matter to a neutral journalist? I thought the role of a journalist is to show people what happened, not guide public discourse. 3) Apparently Arnab now has Y level security after threats to his life by Pak based terror groups. http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/arnab-goswami-to-get-security-cover-over-threat-from-pak-based-terror-groups/story-bagPf2jl6fxBa2rHhP3IrO.html
diga Posted October 19, 2016 Posted October 19, 2016 (edited) Edited October 22, 2016 by diga tweaker 1
Tibarn Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 Saggy and Boxer at Georgetown University. tweaker 1
chewy Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 5 hours ago, Tibarn said: Saggy and Boxer at Georgetown University. fair enough sagarika is an incompetent bum, and Rajdeep is a thug...but why do people keep tabs on these two idiots, within mainstream media both have lost credibility and are now nobodies, especially Sagarika who works as third grade columnist for Toilet paper. these two and many like them are nothing more than attention seekers, who spout controversial (full of contradictions) nonsense so they can remain even in the faintest of limelight. tweaker 1
Tibarn Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 2 hours ago, chewy said: fair enough sagarika is an incompetent bum, and Rajdeep is a thug...but why do people keep tabs on these two idiots, within mainstream media both have lost credibility and are now nobodies, especially Sagarika who works as third grade columnist for Toilet paper. these two and many like them are nothing more than attention seekers, who spout controversial (full of contradictions) nonsense so they can remain even in the faintest of limelight. On my end, some people on my twitter timeline are usually complaining about these people so I just post it on here. On the other hand, they are the English language media, so whatever they do is magnified, as they are the conduits through which the rest of the world see Indian news/politics. Otherwise I don't think many people would care. I mean someone like Barkha who has such little viewership gets invited to a premier university like Brown, or Saggy/Boxer goes to Georgetown. A Hindi/regional language anchor, even though they have more viewership, don't have influence outside of India/the subcontinent, so it's understandable that people are bothered by them. tweaker 1
diga Posted October 22, 2016 Posted October 22, 2016 http://www.opindia.com/2016/10/jnu-politics-rohith-vemula-najeeb-ahmad/ JNU incident : is it manufactured? tweaker 1
mishra Posted November 1, 2016 Posted November 1, 2016 MSM trying to somehow find conspiracy angle in SIMI terrorists. Infact TOI conducting a poll if it was fake or not. They conveniently forget that a constable throat was slit and killed by these terrorists before Police encounter. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/poll-on-killing-of-eight-simi-suspects/polls/55175895.cms Serious low. CG and diga 2
Tibarn Posted November 14, 2016 Posted November 14, 2016 6 hours ago, mishra said: These are the idiots who dedicated an entire article to Padukone's cleavage. Gutter level journalism.
Tibarn Posted December 4, 2016 Posted December 4, 2016 Murthal gangrape blaming Jats may have been a media concoction.
diga Posted March 13, 2017 Posted March 13, 2017 Any MSM reports on modifications of history textbooks in Tripura by communists?
narenpande1 Posted March 26, 2017 Posted March 26, 2017 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2017/03/24/meet-the-militant-monk-spreading-islamophobia-in-india/?utm_term=.baa227d0ff60#comments Just look at the headline this F***ing B**h editor framed for Washington Post . What the F is " militant monk " ??? The author is based in India, and such articles circulated in the West terribly tarnish India's image. F*k democracy, @ssholes like this woman need to be arrested for being a part of someone's ( an enemy state ) anti-national propaganda/payroll
Muloghonto Posted March 26, 2017 Posted March 26, 2017 10 minutes ago, narenpande1 said: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/global-opinions/wp/2017/03/24/meet-the-militant-monk-spreading-islamophobia-in-india/?utm_term=.baa227d0ff60#comments Just look at the headline this F***ing B**h editor framed for Washington Post . What the F is " militant monk " ??? The author is based in India, and such articles circulated in the West terribly tarnish India's image. F*k democracy, @ssholes like this woman need to be arrested for being a part of someone's ( an enemy state ) anti-national propaganda/payroll sorry but there is nothing anti-national in criticizing an individual. It is anti-national to demand prosecution for free speech and putting certain people above criticism from the people of the nation. These hindu chaddis require the same amount of exposing and scorn as the Muslim fundoos. Both are cancer to our nation- one is just a lot more fast acting cancer than the other.
narenpande1 Posted March 27, 2017 Posted March 27, 2017 4 hours ago, Muloghonto said: sorry but there is nothing anti-national in criticizing an individual. It is anti-national to demand prosecution for free speech and putting certain people above criticism from the people of the nation. These hindu chaddis require the same amount of exposing and scorn as the Muslim fundoos. Both are cancer to our nation- one is just a lot more fast acting cancer than the other. Do you belong to the pseudo secular brigade ? Glad that all the 300 replies/comments on that article have hammered the idiotic ill-informed propagandist editor
Muloghonto Posted March 27, 2017 Posted March 27, 2017 (edited) 27 minutes ago, narenpande1 said: Do you belong to the pseudo secular brigade ? Glad that all the 300 replies/comments on that article have hammered the idiotic ill-informed propagandist editor I am not a psuedo-secular. I am pucca 100% western style secular. The type you don't really have in India. Criticize all you want. That is your right and that is fair. but to advocate people should be arrested for saying things, sorry but is unacceptable. Edited March 27, 2017 by Muloghonto
diga Posted March 27, 2017 Posted March 27, 2017 https://nilanjanabhowmick.carbonmade.com/about The author's profile in her own words... what an egotist
Recommended Posts