Has there been a player more cringy than Hardik Pandya?

[Khota]

4 hours ago, philcric said:

 

But did he play both football and golf at international level ?

 

 

 

You are neither funny nor correct. You are missing the point here.

[Ankit_sharma03]

13 minutes ago, Khota said:

Go analyze your statement again.

that made no sense, saaf bol de counter point nhin hai or u hvent seen 2005 ashes

[Ankit_sharma03]

deleted

Edited June 28, 2018 by Ankit_sharma03

[Ankit_sharma03]

deleted 

Edited June 28, 2018 by Ankit_sharma03

[Khota]

8 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

that made no sense, saaf bol de counter point nhin hai or u hvent seen 2005 ashes

All you do is watch TV and have opinion. There is more to it.

[Ankit_sharma03]

10 minutes ago, Khota said:

All you do is watch TV and have opinion. There is more to it.

atleast i watch cricket n give opinion  about cricket, u watch football n talk about cricket 

[LORD_analyst]

On 6/24/2018 at 8:10 PM, UnknownGenius said:

He is a phony. Not surprised since he plays for Bambis. Fake bandwagon fans, fake players, cheating all fit together

 

He should have been brought up through Royals and he would benore grounded

wow....csk diarrhea is still on for some posters.....

wake up, ipl is OVER!!!!!!!!!

[philcric]

53 minutes ago, Khota said:

Do you really think he belongs?

 

In an international T20/ODI side?

 

Yes.

 

His role is #5 bowler and #7 batsman. And he does a fair job of it.

 

He would get into all international T20/ODI sides except probably England because they already have similar players like Stokes and Woakes.

 

[philcric]

1 hour ago, Khota said:

He had a decent run.

You gave stats of one game to prove your point. I gave stats of 13 games to prove my point. IPL stats which you swear by.

 

Quote

He is not an allrounder.

Got wickets. Scored runs. That makes him an all-rounder. 

 

Quote

 

In 50 yeras India had one only so quit wasting time and giving him free games.

 

He is not a free loader. Contributes in almost every game in at least 2 disciplines of batting, bowling and fielding.

 

 

 

 

Edited June 28, 2018 by philcric

[Clarke]

5 minutes ago, philcric said:

You gave stats of one game to prove your point. I gave stats of 13 games to prove my point. IPL stats which you swear by.

 

Got wickets. Scored runs. That makes him an all-rounder. 

 

He is not a free loader. Contributes in almost every game in at last 2 disciplines of batting, bowling and fielding.

 

 

 

 

 

ur wasting ur time. This guy/gal/bot created a rigid new definition of all rounder to claim enlightenment and preaches to the world about their non existence. Puri duniya gadhi hai, ek wo hi cricket expert reh gaya hai. Then there's newer theories to justify this claim about all rounders: pre-IPL cricket era was full of amateurs and hence their all rounder abilities don't count or are simply anomalies 

[philcric]

1 hour ago, Khota said:

You are neither funny nor correct.

Either you get it or you don't 

 

Quote

You are missing the point here.

I doubt it. All you do is make tangential and factually incorrect statements with no cricketing logic.

 

[Khota]

5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

atleast i watch cricket n give opinion  about cricket, u watch football n talk about cricket 

Is that ok with you?

[Khota]

4 hours ago, philcric said:

 

In an international T20/ODI side?

 

Yes.

 

His role is #5 bowler and #7 batsman. And he does a fair job of it.

 

He would get into all international T20/ODI sides except probably England because they already have similar players like Stokes and Woakes.

 

If he is the 5th bawler and 7th batsman you do admit he is the worst bowler and the worst batsman? Did I miss something.

[Khota]

4 hours ago, philcric said:

Either you get it or you don't 

 

I doubt it. All you do is make tangential and factually incorrect statements with no cricketing logic.

 

Can you point those out?

[philcric]

6 minutes ago, Khota said:

If he is the 5th bawler and 7th batsman you do admit he is the worst bowler and the worst batsman? Did I miss something.

 

Yes. Plenty.

 

Ever heard of a concept called team balance ? The same player being 5th bowler AND 7th batter is good value, gives the team a balance. If you replace that player with a batsman/bowler, it will weaken bowling/batting.

 

This is another example of you going tangential. From Pandya can't bowl based on scorecard of one match to ... but does he really belong (when ipl 2018 season stats shows he bowled and batted well across 13 games) to ... oh he is the 'worst' because he is the 5th bowler and the 7th batter in the team.

 

[philcric]

32 minutes ago, Khota said:

Can you point those out?

 

They have been pointed out plenty of times by many here.

 

About all-rounders, about test keepers (Saha/Parthiv), about test openers.

 

 

 

[sandeep]

27 minutes ago, philcric said:

 

Yes. Plenty.

 

Ever heard of a concept called team balance ? The same player being 5th bowler AND 7th batter is good value, gives the team a balance. If you replace that player with a batsman/bowler, it will weaken bowling/batting.

 

This is another example of you going tangential. From Pandya can't bowl based on scorecard of one match to ... but does he really belong (when ipl 2018 season stats shows he bowled and batted well across 13 games) to ... oh he is the 'worst' because he is the 5th bowler and the 7th batter in the team.

 

This reminds me of the thread I created back in 2016 about Pandya's potential.  Could use a bump.  

[Stuge]

On 6/23/2018 at 7:14 PM, Forever Indian said:

And Rohit Sharma's reply to Umar Akmal's grape diet on bed:

Nothing beats this photoshoot lol

[UrmiSinhaRay]

Nothing beats this photoshoot lol

Why do many of these players do portfolios like this?.
With his potbelly, RoFat Sharma is not gonna have a shot at modelling LMAOOO

Sent from my CPH1609 using Tapatalk

[Stuge]

On 6/23/2018 at 7:14 PM, Forever Indian said:

 

 

btw most annoying player on social media is Umar Akmal haha

Edited June 28, 2018 by Stuge