Clarke Posted September 11, 2018 Author Share Posted September 11, 2018 3 minutes ago, velu said: gadothkaaja is extremely powerful at the night time .. great horned owls murder much bigger golden eagle at night ... velu 1 Link to comment
vayuu1 Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 29 minutes ago, Global.Baba said: A fast bowler who has nearly 600 wickets is an ATG period. No 2 ways. Sure you can compare apples to apples with other ATGs and make a case for who was better but Jimmy Anderson is an ATG. Calling him GTB etc is embarrassing. Bhai he is a ccb and gtb and no it's not embarrassing its a fact, ccb = cloudy conditions Bully Link to comment
vayuu1 Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 No one is denying he is not a atg Link to comment
Global.Baba Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 Just now, vayuu1 said: Bhai he is a ccb and gtb and no it's not embarrassing its a fact, ccb = cloudy conditions Bully So Kumble is not an ATG? Chalo I have heard that argument before too but let us say a guy has taken wickets every where but has may be 250 wickets and had a short career, how is he better than a guy who has more than double the wickets? Sure I agree if you say McGrath is greater than Anderson but a guy who has nearly 600 wickets is absolutely an ATG and that too a fast bowler who has had such a long career. Link to comment
Global.Baba Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 2 minutes ago, vayuu1 said: No one is denying he is not a atg Ok my bad. Link to comment
velu Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 43 minutes ago, Global.Baba said: A fast bowler who has nearly 600 wickets is an ATG period. No 2 ways. Sure you can compare apples to apples with other ATGs and make a case for who was better but Jimmy Anderson is an ATG. Calling him GTB etc is embarrassing. yep .. little bit embarrassing for him tilana samaraveera level Link to comment
coffee_rules Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 He's playing since 2003. Why was he dropped for Ashes 2005 series? Link to comment
Cricketics Posted September 11, 2018 Share Posted September 11, 2018 Absolute legend. We are lucky to have such a bowler play in this era. Link to comment
Clarke Posted September 12, 2018 Author Share Posted September 12, 2018 9 hours ago, coffee_rules said: He's playing since 2003. Why was he dropped for Ashes 2005 series? He wasn't an established test bowler then, was discovering his feet in both formats. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now