James Anderson, 10 years on

[Clarke]

3 minutes ago, velu said:

gadothkaaja is extremely powerful at the night time ..

great horned owls murder much bigger golden eagle at night ...

 

[vayuu1]

29 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

A fast bowler  who has nearly 600 wickets is an ATG period. No 2 ways. Sure you can compare apples to apples with other ATGs and make a case for who was better but Jimmy Anderson is an ATG. Calling him GTB etc is embarrassing.

 

 

Bhai he is a ccb and gtb and no it's not embarrassing its a fact, ccb = cloudy conditions Bully 

[vayuu1]

No one is denying he is not a atg 

[Global.Baba]

Just now, vayuu1 said:

Bhai he is a ccb and gtb and no it's not embarrassing its a fact, ccb = cloudy conditions Bully 

So Kumble is not an ATG? Chalo I have heard that argument before too but let us say a guy has taken wickets every where but has may be 250 wickets and had a short career, how is he better than a guy who has more than double the wickets?

 

Sure I agree if you say McGrath is greater than Anderson but a guy who has nearly 600 wickets is absolutely an ATG and that too a fast bowler who has had such a long career.

[Global.Baba]

2 minutes ago, vayuu1 said:

No one is denying he is not a atg 

Ok my bad. 

[velu]

43 minutes ago, Global.Baba said:

A fast bowler  who has nearly 600 wickets is an ATG period. No 2 ways. Sure you can compare apples to apples with other ATGs and make a case for who was better but Jimmy Anderson is an ATG. Calling him GTB etc is embarrassing.

 

 

 

yep .. little bit embarrassing for him

tilana samaraveera level  

[coffee_rules]

He's playing since 2003. Why was he dropped for Ashes 2005 series?

 

[Cricketics]

Absolute legend. We are lucky to have   such a bowler play in this era. 

[Clarke]

9 hours ago, coffee_rules said:

He's playing since 2003. Why was he dropped for Ashes 2005 series?

 

He wasn't an established test bowler then, was discovering his feet in both formats.