philcric Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 Great bowling by Pandya today. Created 4 wicket taking chances in just 5 overs Saved our ass while batting too. Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 1 minute ago, philcric said: Shakib, Stokes and Pandya should get tested. Something wrong with their 'biology'. We all knew about reproductive system chapter in biology but when did this chapter got added " U cant bat n bowl with same body" Unstable Joe 1 Link to comment
philcric Posted June 27, 2019 Share Posted June 27, 2019 Almost half of specialist batsmen across all teams are failing in this WC. Coincidence? Link to comment
Khota Posted June 27, 2019 Author Share Posted June 27, 2019 2 hours ago, philcric said: Shakib, Stokes and Pandya should get tested. Something wrong with their 'biology'. Pandya was the worst bowler for India today. You are on to something. Link to comment
Khota Posted June 27, 2019 Author Share Posted June 27, 2019 2 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: We all knew about reproductive system chapter in biology but when did this chapter got added " U cant bat n bowl with same body" Same reason as you cannot run 100m and 800m. Flat Earthers. Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 6 hours ago, Khota said: Pandya was the worst bowler for India today. You are on to something. how was he worst he did his job.....if 5 bowlers bowl someone will be worst and he is the 5th bowler not main so he wud be most days. If he is suppouse to be best batsman n best bowler what are specialist for His 5 chances didnt convert to wkt.....something called luck . Start watching games not scorecard. Link to comment
Ankit_sharma03 Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 6 hours ago, Khota said: Same reason as you cannot run 100m and 800m. Flat Earthers. What are u doing a cricket forum....u shud find marathon forums Unstable Joe 1 Link to comment
Khota Posted June 28, 2019 Author Share Posted June 28, 2019 5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: how was he worst he did his job.....if 5 bowlers bowl someone will be worst and he is the 5th bowler not main so he wud be most days. If he is suppouse to be best batsman n best bowler what are specialist for His 5 chances didnt convert to wkt.....something called luck . Start watching games not scorecard. He always was the worst. This is a trend. Link to comment
Khota Posted June 28, 2019 Author Share Posted June 28, 2019 5 hours ago, Ankit_sharma03 said: What are u doing a cricket forum....u shud find marathon forums So once again you dont have the answer. You cannot discard Knieseology when it comes to sports. What I am doing in this forum is for mods to decide. Not for a two bit weekend warrior. Link to comment
Gollum Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 (edited) Shakib Al Hasan Ben Stokes Hardik Pandya Chris Morris Mohammad Saifuddin James Neesham Mohammad Nabi Carlos Brathwaite Imad Wasim DO NOT EXIST Edited July 7, 2019 by Gollum Link to comment
IndianRenegade Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 On 6/28/2019 at 4:28 AM, Khota said: He always was the worst. This is a trend. He always was the 5th bowler. Link to comment
IndianRenegade Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 On 6/28/2019 at 4:30 AM, Khota said: So once again you dont have the answer. You cannot discard Knieseology when it comes to sports. What I am doing in this forum is for mods to decide. Not for a two bit weekend warrior. The answer is you don’t even get analogies correct. The cricket equivalent of 100m to 800m might be t20 to 50 over. Are you a kinesiologist? Or do you have any kinesiologists opinion that “all rounders can’t exist” and their reasoning? Link to comment
Khota Posted July 7, 2019 Author Share Posted July 7, 2019 35 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said: He always was the 5th bowler. That means there are 4 ahead of him. Maybe a dozen. Link to comment
Khota Posted July 7, 2019 Author Share Posted July 7, 2019 16 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said: The answer is you don’t even get analogies correct. The cricket equivalent of 100m to 800m might be t20 to 50 over. Are you a kinesiologist? Or do you have any kinesiologists opinion that “all rounders can’t exist” and their reasoning? The reasoning is simple. Bowling and Batting require different skillsets. Link to comment
Zero_Unit Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 I know very little about Kinesiology but if kotha's knowledge about kinesiology is anything similar to how he was rambling about Algorithm a while back, just ignore his trolling and move on. If Shakib and Stokes from current gen, previously Kallis and co has not put this debate to shame yet, I don't know what will. philcric, zen and The Hound 3 Link to comment
IndianRenegade Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 Just now, Khota said: That means there are 4 ahead of him. Maybe a dozen. Yes sir, but can you count the any of the 4 or even the dozen to score as much runs as he does at the position he bats? Link to comment
Khota Posted July 7, 2019 Author Share Posted July 7, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said: Yes sir, but can you count the any of the 4 or even the dozen to score as much runs as he does at the position he bats? Someone needs to use analytics to figure out if his 30 runs are more valuable or a specialist 5th bowler who can cause an opposition collapse. Edited July 7, 2019 by Khota Link to comment
IndianRenegade Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 5 minutes ago, Khota said: The reasoning is simple. Bowling and Batting require different skillsets. You didn’t answer my question. Everyone knows bowling and batting requires different skill sets. The question is which kinesiologist claimed that human body can’t handle two skill sets? Link to comment
Zero_Unit Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 3 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said: You didn’t answer my question. Everyone knows bowling and batting requires different skill sets. The question is which kinesiologist claimed that human body can’t handle two skill sets? I bet OP never even heard of Ellyse Perry. Forget just cricket, she juggles with two of the most popular sports in the world and has the skillset to be a top player. Not to mention she is an allrounder in cricket aswell. .. The Hound, zen and philcric 3 Link to comment
Khota Posted July 7, 2019 Author Share Posted July 7, 2019 9 minutes ago, IndianRenegade said: You didn’t answer my question. Everyone knows bowling and batting requires different skill sets. The question is which kinesiologist claimed that human body can’t handle two skill sets? Let me answer the question for you as you are being argumentative. Body can handle two skillsets but at that level cannot excel at both. At that level you are not supposed to be good. You have to excel. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now