All Rounders do not exist.

[Ankit_sharma03]

23 minutes ago, Khota said:

You can call it a combination but five bats and five bowlers.

doesnt work in LOI , no team uses it and no team will 

ye sab kitaabi baaten kitaab men achi lagti hai 

22 minutes ago, Khota said:

Seriously! As if one has not done enough damage. If trolling than it is not nice.

we are a much better side with pandya then we were with Jadeja n Axar

[Ankit_sharma03]

26 minutes ago, Khota said:

Both. Both will be out soon and the endless search will start again.

no one is going nywere

Hardik specially is a lambi race k ghoda

[Khota]

20 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

doesnt work in LOI , no team uses it and no team will 

ye sab kitaabi baaten kitaab men achi lagti hai 

we are a much better side with pandya then we were with Jadeja n Axar

It has worked out  real well lately.

This concept of part times and bits and pieces is not good. You need to speciaize. Either learn now or later but it will happen.

[Khota]

20 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

no one is going nywere

Hardik specially is a lambi race k ghoda

It is barely 600 years that people realized earth goes around the sun. No worries.

[Ankit_sharma03]

10 minutes ago, Khota said:

It has worked out  real well lately.

When ???

Quote

This concept of part times and bits and pieces is not good. You need to speciaize. Either learn now or later but it will happen.

yet we have so many great all rounders in the game 

it hasnt happened before and will not happen in future to unless u find few specialist who has posses 2nd skill and such are rare rare to find to wo jab aayenge to dekhenge 

 

On the very day ur going after krunal, opp stonis n maxwell won it for them who are also all rounder for them 

Edited November 21, 2018 by Ankit_sharma03

[Ankit_sharma03]

5 minutes ago, Khota said:

It is barely 600 years that people realized earth goes around the sun. No worries.

Now that u hve done ur sidhuism 

show me facts which is where m im intersted in , kyunki kohli ko ground pe team khilani hia hawayi baaten nhin krni

[Khota]

40 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

When ???

yet we have so many great all rounders in the game 

it hasnt happened before and will not happen in future to unless u find few specialist who has posses 2nd skill and such are rare rare to find to wo jab aayenge to dekhenge 

 

On the very day ur going after krunal, opp stonis n maxwell won it for them who are also all rounder for them 

That is the difference. India lost the match. I am not so sure Australia won.

[Khota]

40 minutes ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

When ???

yet we have so many great all rounders in the game 

it hasnt happened before and will not happen in future to unless u find few specialist who has posses 2nd skill and such are rare rare to find to wo jab aayenge to dekhenge 

 

On the very day ur going after krunal, opp stonis n maxwell won it for them who are also all rounder for them 

Care to elaborate.

[Ankit_sharma03]

6 minutes ago, Khota said:

That is the difference. India lost the match. I am not so sure Australia won.

One team has to do bad so other can win, but other has to do well also 

Can u deny that stonis n maxwell didnt make runs or had stonis bowled the wrong balls the result wud have been diff 

 

so ur whole topic goes for a toss as opposition won by the contribution of its all rounders only

[Ankit_sharma03]

9 minutes ago, Khota said:

Care to elaborate.

whats the so diff to understand that 

Cricketer has seen so many good, great, decent  all rounder who have taken their teams to diff level

[jalebi_bhai]

45 minutes ago, Khota said:

Care to elaborate.

How would you define an all-rounder? 

[zen]

With the 4th and 5th bowlers likely to be targeted by the other team, ironically, such incidences only highlights the importance of having breadth and depth in the teams through players who can provide options i.e. ARs / Handy Cricketers .... We missed the 4+3+4 combination, which gives us 7 batting and 6 bowling options 

 

 

[Khota]

1 hour ago, jalebi_bhai said:

How would you define an all-rounder? 

I struggle to because no one can do that. Not possible.

But then there is a classic definition: Batting Avg > Bowling Avg.

[Khota]

1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

whats the so diff to understand that 

Cricketer has seen so many good, great, decent  all rounder who have taken their teams to diff level

So you don't want to.

[Khota]

1 hour ago, Ankit_sharma03 said:

One team has to do bad so other can win, but other has to do well also 

Can u deny that stonis n maxwell didnt make runs or had stonis bowled the wrong balls the result wud have been diff 

 

so ur whole topic goes for a toss as opposition won by the contribution of its all rounders only

One team did bad because someone was masquerading as a bowler who had no place on the team.

Edited November 21, 2018 by Khota

[Khota]

38 minutes ago, zen said:

With the 4th and 5th bowlers likely to be targeted by the other team, ironically, such incidences only highlights the importance of having breadth and depth in the teams through players who can provide options i.e. ARs / Handy Cricketers .... We missed the 4+3+4 combination, which gives us 7 batting and 6 bowling options 

 

 

Seriously. That looks like a Pakistani team.

[Sooda]

We lacked a 6th bowler today; Krunal is not someone who should be bowling full quota of overs. Both Pandya bros should play ODIs and T20Is , that will give us the balance we need. Hardik instead of Pant or Kartik , and that would probably be my ODI XI too.

 

I know Krunal didnt turn up with the bat either but Playing 5 out and out bowlers weakens the batting significantly and its not like specialist bowlers- Khaleel -we exempt from being hammered.

 

I do not think an allrounder has to be good enough to make the XI on one skill - only ATG all rounders were able to do that. The Pandyas are good batsmen. They maybe not as good as some frontline specialist batsmen - but the fact that they can chip in with overs and potentially wickets means that they make up for it. 

[Sooda]

37 minutes ago, Khota said:

One team did bad because someone was masquerading as a bowler who had no place on the team.

That was not his fault, that is the fault of the selectors and management who decided on the final XI and its (im)balance.

 

He is an AR not a bowler, not someone who should be picked to bowl a full quota of overs/ We needed a 6th bowling option. Sadly there arent any apart from Hardik...Shankar and Hooda spring to mind but are they good enough...? Dont know if Sundar is a good enough bat

[Sooda]

41 minutes ago, Khota said:

I struggle to because no one can do that. Not possible.

But then there is a classic definition: Batting Avg > Bowling Avg.

 

1 hour ago, jalebi_bhai said:

How would you define an all-rounder? 

I do not think an allrounder has to be good enough to make the XI on one skill - only ATG all rounders were able to do that. The Pandyas are good batsmen. They maybe not as good as some frontline specialist batsmen - but the fact that they can chip in with overs and potentially wickets means that they make up for it. 

[Khota]

4 hours ago, Sooda said:

That was not his fault, that is the fault of the selectors and management who decided on the final XI and its (im)balance.

 

He is an AR not a bowler, not someone who should be picked to bowl a full quota of overs/ We needed a 6th bowling option. Sadly there arent any apart from Hardik...Shankar and Hooda spring to mind but are they good enough...? Dont know if Sundar is a good enough bat

 

4 hours ago, Sooda said:

 

I do not think an allrounder has to be good enough to make the XI on one skill - only ATG all rounders were able to do that. The Pandyas are good batsmen. They maybe not as good as some frontline specialist batsmen - but the fact that they can chip in with overs and potentially wickets means that they make up for it. 

If someone is not a genuine allrounder then they should be in the team based on their batting or bowling skill. I dont think any Pandya can walk into the team based on one skill.