The Outsider Posted March 29, 2008 Posted March 29, 2008 Will he? Deliberately denying India a chance to post a win.
Holysmoke Posted March 29, 2008 Posted March 29, 2008 Yes, he should. The over rate is even worse than 12!!!!
King Tendulkar Posted March 29, 2008 Posted March 29, 2008 I actually feel sorry for saffies. The onslaught they faced in that heat from sehwag seemed cruel. However, rate is slow so has to be fined. We all know an indian skipper would be
DomainK Posted March 29, 2008 Posted March 29, 2008 I think these days the match referees take over rates very seriously. If I am not wrong, I think there are provisions of even banning a captain for a match if the slow over rate has a direct bearing on the result of the game.
DomainK Posted March 29, 2008 Posted March 29, 2008 I actually feel sorry for saffies. The onslaught they faced in that heat from sehwag seemed cruel. However, rate is slow so has to be fined. We all know an indian skipper would be Yes, I dont think the slow over rate was a deliberate strategy. In fact, I dont think they were in any condition to scheme and operate.
Desi Cartman Posted March 29, 2008 Posted March 29, 2008 Yes' date=' I dont think the slow over rate was a deliberate strategy.[b'] In fact, I dont think they were in any condition to scheme and operate. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
The Outsider Posted March 29, 2008 Author Posted March 29, 2008 An over rate of 10 in this session. 49 overs have been bowled today in 260 minutes!
Temujin Khaghan Posted March 29, 2008 Posted March 29, 2008 What does Will Smith has to do with south african slow over-rates!!!
DomainK Posted March 29, 2008 Posted March 29, 2008 What does Will Smith has to do with south african slow over-rates!!! Bolwing a negavtive strategy is suggestive of alien thinking. He has to come with Agent K and investigate. Then he will have to make provisions to send Smith back to Mars.
Donny Posted March 30, 2008 Posted March 30, 2008 Will he? Deliberately denying India a chance to post a win. What mind boggling hyprocricy !! Anil Kumble presided over the first session of this Test match. India completed 25 overs. With the extra drinks break, we can say 26 overs. Although that's about par for the course, these days, it doesn't usually include 12 overs of spin! AK set the tone. Smith followed. Both captains should be fined - heavily.
King Posted March 30, 2008 Posted March 30, 2008 I don't think anyone's going to be bothered about the over rate in this test match given the conditions and nature of the pitch.
Gambit Posted March 31, 2008 Posted March 31, 2008 http://content.cricinfo.com/ci/content/story/344593.html?CMP=OTC-RSS
Chandan Posted March 31, 2008 Posted March 31, 2008 India v South Africa, 1st Test, Chennai South Africa fined for slow over-rate Cricinfo staff March 31, 2008 South Africa have been fined for their slow over-rate in the first Test against India in Chennai. Roshan Mahanama, the match referee, found the side was two overs short of its target after time allowances were taken in to consideration. On day three South Africa managed only 85 overs as India pushed to gain a first-innings lead. It was the day Virender Sehwag raced to the fastest Test triple-hundred, his second in 55 Tests. According to ICC Code of Conduct players are fined 5% of their match fees for every over lost while captain is fined double of that. Consequently South African players lost 10% of their match fees and Graeme Smith lost 20%. The team cannot appeal the fine. After a dull draw in the first Test the two sides now move on to Ahmedabad for the second one starting on April 3. ------------------------------------------------------------- I'm not quite satisfied. We lost about 12 overs because of SA's slow over rate. Should this much of fine be enough?
DomainK Posted March 31, 2008 Posted March 31, 2008 Good. Poor bowlers first got thrashed and the got fined.
The Outsider Posted March 31, 2008 Author Posted March 31, 2008 What mind boggling hyprocricy !! Anil Kumble presided over the first session of this Test match. India completed 25 overs. With the extra drinks break, we can say 26 overs. Although that's about par for the course, these days, it doesn't usually include 12 overs of spin! AK set the tone. Smith followed. Both captains should be fined - heavily. Who cares who bowled how many overs of spin and pace. Did Kumble put a gun at Smith's temple asking him not to bowl his spinners. Bottom line - India were par on the over rate and South Africa were not and were rightly fined.
Cricketics Posted March 31, 2008 Posted March 31, 2008 after reading the title, I thought Will smith got fined.. will smith, the actor in Men in Black
Cricketics Posted March 31, 2008 Posted March 31, 2008 What mind boggling hyprocricy !! Anil Kumble presided over the first session of this Test match. India completed 25 overs. With the extra drinks break, we can say 26 overs. Although that's about par for the course, these days, it doesn't usually include 12 overs of spin! AK set the tone. Smith followed. Both captains should be fined - heavily. so Smith has been fined now.. DO U THINK ICC match refree didn't take the right step??? by putting a fine on just one captain??? meanz, u r saying that ICC match refree was wrong on his judgement.. and made an error???
Laaloo Posted March 31, 2008 Posted March 31, 2008 What mind boggling hyprocricy !! Anil Kumble presided over the first session of this Test match. India completed 25 overs. With the extra drinks break, we can say 26 overs. Although that's about par for the course, these days, it doesn't usually include 12 overs of spin! AK set the tone. Smith followed. Both captains should be fined - heavily. :omg: u actually watched it?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now