Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 9/13/2025 at 10:04 AM, kepler37b said:

Watched Dil se one more time.

 

Sarook's performance between cringe and sublime. In some scenes he over-acts and looks cringe. In some, where he is subtle and keeps himself in check, it is too good.

 

 

SRK was given a once in a lifetime script by Mani Ratnam.

 

From a purely performance PoV, that is among SRK's best 3. Some would say this is his best.

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Mariyam said:

SRK was given a once in a lifetime script by Mani Ratnam.

 

From a purely performance PoV, that is among SRK's best 3. Some would say this is his best.

HE is alright when he is subtle, like he was in Swades.  At times he does over-act. Acting is 50% in the hands of director. I don't think Bollywood has great directors who can get the very best out of actors. 

Edited by vvvslaxman
Posted
On 9/15/2025 at 8:49 PM, coffee_rules said:

Meh! Balakrishna can do better. Can Kamalhassan match this?

 

 

Man has god-level confidence in his dance and song.

 

In one function he grabbed a mike and sang. It was troll material. He self-trolled the same song in Bhagawant Kesari. The man has such a thick skin. 

 

Tammies have trolled Baalayya...ironically their demi god is making a remake of Baalayya movie....:hysterical::hysterical:

Posted
On 8/16/2025 at 2:25 PM, velu said:

Finally watched coolie

 

First half is good , I really liked it .

Second half is garbage max

 

Director assumed his audience is total dumb :mad:

second half is really worst 

Watched about half movie so far. It is good, regular masala fare with some good cinematic elements.  Disappointed with the Sandy Dancemaster character as the main villian. He has no screen presence , nor is his voice menacing. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Watched about half movie so far. It is good, regular masala fare with some good cinematic elements.  Disappointed with the Sandy Dancemaster character as the main villian. He has no screen presence , nor is his voice menacing. 

Hate that guy sandy

Posted
1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said:

Hate that guy sandy

 

Everybody in both the Telugu states are still cursing and abusing Lokesh for giving Nagarjuna such a forgettable role.

 

Till date I loved all the movies I've seen of Lokesh but this movie was crap and I stopped watching after the 1st half. Looked like Soubin was the lead actor in the movie.

Posted
4 hours ago, Tillu said:

 

Everybody in both the Telugu states are still cursing and abusing Lokesh for giving Nagarjuna such a forgettable role.

 

Till date I loved all the movies I've seen of Lokesh but this movie was crap and I stopped watching after the 1st half. Looked like Soubin was the lead actor in the movie.

 

I never even try to review mega star , big budget movies. They are almost always crap. Because they spend so much money too many guys will give input to make sure it is not a commercial failure. 

Posted
20 hours ago, Tillu said:

 

Everybody in both the Telugu states are still cursing and abusing Lokesh for giving Nagarjuna such a forgettable role.

 

Till date I loved all the movies I've seen of Lokesh but this movie was crap and I stopped watching after the 1st half. Looked like Soubin was the lead actor in the movie.

What a horrible second half worse second half than Vikram. Cameos from Nagarjuna, Upendra, Aamir couldn’t save the horrible script. Sandy was the worst of them all. I thought ghost Nagarjuna did well speaking my Tamil. But a colossal waste of everyone’s time. 

Posted
On 9/17/2025 at 8:45 PM, Tillu said:

 

Everybody in both the Telugu states are still cursing and abusing Lokesh for giving Nagarjuna such a forgettable role.

 

Till date I loved all the movies I've seen of Lokesh but this movie was crap and I stopped watching after the 1st half. Looked like Soubin was the lead actor in the movie.

I have not seen the movie. But in the chase of Pan indian success they added too many cameo's and it did not turn our organic. They tried to copy the success of Jailer.

Posted
8 hours ago, kepler37b said:

I have not seen the movie. But in the chase of Pan indian success they added too many cameo's and it did not turn our organic. They tried to copy the success of Jailer.

 

Yeah everybody wants that elusive 1000 cr boxoffice success, that's why the needless cameos.

Posted
28 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Saw this movie. Postponed it and finally watched it. Tom has done a fine job in this true story.

 

shopping?q=tbn:ANd9GcS2oMsw4_BsLSBTARzL-

 

This movie was so intriguing from start to finish. Probably my favourite Tom cruise's movie.

Posted
53 minutes ago, Tillu said:

 

This movie was so intriguing from start to finish. Probably my favourite Tom cruise's movie.

 

Ya.. it was different from Tom. Sure it is not as good Liman's bournes identity. He is known for fast cuts in movies. You could see plenty of that here

Posted
47 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Ya.. it was different from Tom. Sure it is not as good Liman's bournes identity. He is known for fast cuts in movies. You could see plenty of that here

 

Just checked the director's filmography. Yeah he made some good movies.

Posted
10 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Saw this movie. Postponed it and finally watched it. Tom has done a fine job in this true story.

 

shopping?q=tbn:ANd9GcS2oMsw4_BsLSBTARzL-

It's an excellent movie and I loved it very much.

Posted
8 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Ya.. it was different from Tom. Sure it is not as good Liman's bournes identity. He is known for fast cuts in movies. You could see plenty of that here

Talking about Liman, watch Edge of Tomorrow. It is excellent movie and I have seen quite a few times already. I watch it almost yearly and always find something new in it.

Posted
1 hour ago, AnotherRaj said:

Talking about Liman, watch Edge of Tomorrow. It is excellent movie and I have seen quite a few times already. I watch it almost yearly and always find something new in it.

yes That is another good movie

×
×
  • Create New...