BacktoCricaddict Posted February 9, 2021 Posted February 9, 2021 What's the bloody point, then? Keep all hypotheses on the table and investigate with no pre-conditions or preconceived conclusions. Especially when there is evidence that the lab was doing its work in lower biosafety "BSL-2" facilities, when by protocol, they are supposed to use BSL-3 or 4. http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/a-real-investigation-into-the-origins-of-covid/ As a scientist and a science writer, we believe that both natural and lab-based scenarios of Covid-19’s origins must be rigorously investigated, not only to avert future pandemics but for the sake of science’s reputation. The formal investigation launched by WHO is only taking steps to look into natural origins. That needs to change.
Jimmy Cliff Posted February 9, 2021 Posted February 9, 2021 Worth a watch for those interested in the real history of the WHO. coffee_rules 1
Clarke Posted February 10, 2021 Posted February 10, 2021 Its called Wuhan Health Org for a reason. The Chinese were preparing the ground work all along by looking for/claiming covid virus in imported frozen food. Some interesting circumstantial data from 2019: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/42669767 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/09/coronavirus-may-have-been-in-wuhan-in-august-study-suggests coffee_rules 1
Mariyam Posted February 10, 2021 Posted February 10, 2021 WHO let the virus out? WHO WHO WHO WHO dial_100, coffee_rules, maniac and 2 others 5
BacktoCricaddict Posted February 10, 2021 Author Posted February 10, 2021 3 hours ago, Mariyam said: WHO let the virus out? WHO WHO WHO WHO Post of the Day!
Recommended Posts