Jump to content

Arguments/Facts in India's favor vs. Arguments/Facts against India and Fair Outcome. Let's call it on this thread


rangeelaraja

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Stumped said:

 

The bonus was a 5 year incentive payment, the concept of the hundred didn't even exist 5 years ago.

Well hello there ECB apologist, nice to see you around these parts after quite some time.  

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, sandeep said:

Post the possible XI please. 

 

 

it was a genuine question I don’t have the answer. if they could have do you think they should have?

Posted
1 hour ago, rkt.india said:

They didn't have fast bowlers to field. Remember the first statement by ECB. It said didn't have players to take the field. 

Shami, Prasidh, Ishant, Ashwin, Sundar makes a half decent line up. 'not having the players' doesn't really say much.

 

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, goose said:

Shami, Prasidh, Ishant, Ashwin, Sundar makes a half decent line up. 'not having the players' doesn't really say much.

 

Shami and Ishant both had niggles and were working with the physio. Sundar left the tour after fracturing his finger in the warmup three months back.  Players also had nets on Wednesday while Nets on Thursday got cancelled once the news of Physio getting positive came out.

Edited by rkt.india
Posted
1 hour ago, rkt.india said:

Shami and Ishant both had niggles and were working with the physio. Sundar left the tour after fracturing his finger in the warmup three months back.  Players also had nets on Wednesday while Nets on Thursday got cancelled once the news of Physio getting positive came out.

ok. i actually don't know what happened in SL, did we fly players in?

Posted
4 hours ago, Stumped said:

 

Looks like you'll have to actually start providing real facts rather than making them up on the spot to suit your argument :nervous:.

 

Did Yorkshire CC hire you yet? I hear they are in desperate need to pump out positive PR.

Posted
10 hours ago, goose said:

it was a genuine question I don’t have the answer. if they could have do you think they should have?

 

I would have been fine with whatever judgement call they made - whether to play or not - that was completely their prerogative.

 

Personally, I would have loved it if they had played, was really looking forward to a good test match, but that should not factor into the decision.

Posted
10 hours ago, goose said:

ok. i actually don't know what happened in SL, did we fly players in?

No. We had 20+ players, 9 got quarantined. We didn't have any batsman left and as a result we lost those two T20s.  Bhuvneshwar IIRC batted at 6 . Here, Team wouldn't have wanted to play without fast bowlers and support staff. It's a test series on the line, better cancel or postpone it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...