Jump to content

Why are we trying to bring back Trundler Culture in Indian cricket again  ??  Our pace bowling revolution started with the pace and bounce of Bumrah and Shami.and the height of Ishant.


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Vijy said:

yes, this trio will be chosen because 2 of them can bat. somehow they will bring in deepak chahar too

Sakariya has a very loopy stealth incoming left arm all phase angle according  to bowling aerospace chief architect Dravid Sir:yo: and Mhambrey Sir

 

Elite level of talent and the methods used to develop him are highly classified:phew:(The stealth part is you will never see any effect of his bowling on batsmen,the best part)

Edited by Suhaan
Posted

Atleast go with trundlers who can bat. 

 

Maybe try this:

7 ash

8 thakur

9 chahar

10 undacutta

11 mukesh

 

Want to see this team play for the comedy. 

 

Who knows dravid might actually do it

Posted

This is a serious worry.

Whoever started this nonsense queue in Indian cricket should be fired straightaway. This is because of this queue that losers like Avesh, Mavi, Unadkat and now Mukesh is getting consistent chances.

 

Remember nobody could bypassed Harshal Patel because of this stupid backing of a player and he got to play 25 games and then dumped. So, exactly what TM have achieved giving Harshal 25 games????

Harshit Rana can't bypass these losers because he is last position of this queue as of now and he will have to wait.

Posted
5 hours ago, Suhaan said:

Sakariya has a very loopy stealth incoming left arm all phase angle according  to bowling aerospace chief architect Dravid Sir:yo: and Mhambrey Sir

 

Elite level of talent and the methods used to develop him are highly classified:phew:(The stealth part is you will never see any effect of his bowling on batsmen,the best part)

stealth bomber sakariya

Posted
4 hours ago, wazza said:

Atleast go with trundlers who can bat. 

 

Maybe try this:

7 ash

8 thakur

9 chahar

10 undacutta

11 mukesh

 

Want to see this team play for the comedy. 

 

Who knows dravid might actually do it

dravid is probably getting off to thoughts of playing such an "attack". replace mukesh coomer with boobi coomer, who can bat

Posted

Saw some of the highlights COetzee. He is rapid. He also has good slower balls. Same under-19 batch as  Mavi, Nagarkoti, Shaheen.  He has developed well.SA keeps producing these fast bowlers. Well built, athletic.

Posted

Netravalkar should have stayed back in India lol He is hard to score of for some reason. Faf gets out after struggling against him. His 80 mph deliveries would have earned him an India cap.

Posted
2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Netravalkar should have stayed back in India lol He is hard to score of for some reason. Faf gets out after struggling against him. His 80 mph deliveries would have earned him an India cap.

neta was 120 kph IIRC in India

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Vijy said:

doesn't surprise me. their standards are quite low

Faf couldn't hit him lol He is a veteran now.  He was okay in the under-19 world cup for us. One of the average batch. Unadkat was bowling at 139 kph . 

Sandeep/Netravalkar/Unadkat our lead attack in 2010 world cup-

Edited by vvvslaxman
Posted
7 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

COetzee.has developed well.SA keeps producing these fast bowlers. Well built, athletic.

 

 

Even we do. But we do not want to prioritize them, develop them with passion or pick them.

 

Australia, South Africa, Old West Indies or Pakistan would have made much better use of Harshit, Tyagi, Kuldeep Sen, Mohsin or Prasidh. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Even we do. But we do not want to prioritize them, develop them with passion or pick them.

 

Australia, South Africa, Old West Indies or Pakistan would have made much better use of Harshit, Tyagi, Kuldeep Sen, Mohsin or Prasidh. 

 

 

Ofcourde they would. Can we loan them out to developers elsewhere. India is for lover trundlers and bowlers with zero bounce. Let all these 6 7 new fast bouncy guys play somewhere else. Give them to Lanka or Bangladesh.  They would destroy us I am sure if we played those same players that play in ranji elsewhere. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

 

Even we do. But we do not want to prioritize them, develop them with passion or pick them.

 

Australia, South Africa, Old West Indies or Pakistan would have made much better use of Harshit, Tyagi, Kuldeep Sen, Mohsin or Prasidh. 

 

 

They have latched onto the thought "pace is not everything",which is an incomplete sentence, everyone knows that

SENA sides and Pak also knows that ,but the keyword here is pace plays a major role

Key contributors-

55% pace+5%

15% movement

30%line & length+-5%

 

Edited by Suhaan
Posted
On 7/17/2023 at 6:02 PM, Suhaan said:

They have latched onto the thought "pace is not everything",which is an incomplete sentence, everyone knows that

SENA sides and Pak also knows that ,but the keyword here is pace plays a major role

Key contributors-

55% pace+5%

15% movement

30%line & length+-5%

 

Arre ok. Pace is not everything. That's fine. But bounce matters. Atleast tall bowlers that generate bounce is all we are asking lmao

Posted
43 minutes ago, wazza said:

Arre ok. Pace is not everything. That's fine. But bounce matters. Atleast tall bowlers that generate bounce is all we are asking lmao

Here it means including bounce

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...