Jump to content

The Ashes 2023


zen

Ashes and Diamonds  

26 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will triumph?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 07/07/23 at 04:00 PM

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

DUke ball has been exhibitingg this behavior for a while. Even we had that benefit. Just that these guys are too experienceed to set up bastmen patiently. 

It's not just the setting up. They are moving it more consistently. And then they keep pestering the umpire if it stops even for 15 minutes. 

Posted
1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

You cannot compare the quality of English bowlers in Englis conditions with  Thakur, Umesh, Siraj, Shami. That is the best they have.

What have they accompished ,couldnt beat india or aus at home.

Posted
1 minute ago, Nikhil_cric said:

It's not just the setting up. They are moving it more consistently. And then they keep pestering the umpire if it stops even for 15 minutes. 

 

Duke balls are not the same anymore. Poor quality control. When India bowled in West Indies with Duke ball they changed the ball 5 times in such a short period.

Posted
Just now, MediumPacer said:

What have they accompished ,couldnt beat india or aus at home.

 

Current ENgland should beat us comfortably. Root's England was losing even in West Indies. Even against Aussies some tactical errors cost thme more than Australia's brilliance. Once wood and woakes joined them their unit looks completely different. It is a mistake that England did not play them in the first 2 tests

Posted
4 minutes ago, MediumPacer said:

What have they accompished ,couldnt beat india or aus at home.

So true, if  they could not beat this poor Aussie team then they have done nothing.

 

 

Posted

England's the most boring place to watch test cricket. Friggin Darren Stevens was taking bucketloads of wickets in county.  A host of 80 mph bowlers landing it on a length relentlessly and looking like a million dollars is just meh. Give me flat/spinning/bouncy wickets any day over this trash.

Posted

Series average

 

Mark Wood 17.91

Woakes 19.92

Broad 27.25

Starc 27.52

Robinson 28.40

Hazlewood 29.33

Lyon 29.33

Stokes 29.66

Cummins 35.29

Marsh 44.00

Green 47.00

Moeen Ali 64.50

Anderson 70.59

Boland 115.50

 

 

Clearly  England has outbowled Australia

Posted
2 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

Series average

 

Mark Wood 17.91

Woakes 19.92

Broad 27.25

Starc 27.52

Robinson 28.40

Hazlewood 29.33

Lyon 29.33

Stokes 29.66

Cummins 35.29

Marsh 44.00

Green 47.00

Moeen Ali 64.50

Anderson 70.59

Boland 115.50

 

 

Clearly  England has outbowled Australia

That is more an reflection on how poor Australian batting has been this series than great bowling from England.

 

Aussies batsmen have nothing to complain, this series has been played on flat grassless wickets for most part.

 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Current ENgland should beat us comfortably. Root's England was losing even in West Indies. Even against Aussies some tactical errors cost thme more than Australia's brilliance. Once wood and woakes joined them their unit looks completely different. It is a mistake that England did not play them in the first 2 tests

hypotheticals dont matter ,fact is they couldnt ,they even lost in wi.

Posted

tony : "Root in many ways reminds me of Tendulkar! Scores oodles of rings despite the very odd dip in form and chips in with some tidy bowling. Makes you wonder what sort of bowler they could have been if they focused on that skill and not batting (disclaimer! I know that there batting might have suffered but Kallis was successful at both : " Yeah, it's true that Tendulkar was a similar jack of all trades with the ball. I guess you can afford to experiment when your major string is quite so prominent

 

Same thoughts. Root cannot be typecast. He tries different things for different batsmen. Ofcourse tendulkar had much tougher skill in his repertoire. Outswing, leg spin, googly.

Posted
Just now, putrevus said:

That is more an reflection on how poor Australian batting has been this series than great bowling from England.

 

Aussies batsmen have nothing to complain, this series has been played on flat grassless wickets for most part.

 

 

 

How can you say that when they couldn't even literally see Wood's deliveries and got flattened.

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

How can you say that when they couldn't even literally see Wood's deliveries and got flattened.

Aussie batsmen should be last batsmen to worry about pace. 

Edited by putrevus
Posted
1 minute ago, putrevus said:

Aussie batsmen should be last batsmen to worry about pace. 

 

I guess you didn't see the third test. Before even Khawaj brought his bat down Wood's delivery blasted his stumps.

Posted
1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

I guess you didn't see the third test. Before even Khawaj brought his bat down Wood's delivery blasted his stumps.

So what , any batsman can get out to pacy delivery  , Akthar flattened few Aussie batsmen does it mean Aussies were afraid of him.

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, putrevus said:

So what , any batsman can get out to pacy delivery  , Akthar flattened few Aussie batsmen does it mean Aussies were afraid of him.

 

 

 

 You are talking about Australia from the 2000s.Apart from Mitch Marsh nobody had clue against WOod in third test. Perth grown Marsh was the only one who could handle the pace. Smith was late almost by a second when he walked across against Wood

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...