Jump to content

Harshit Rana


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, wazza said:

Too much pak passion reading maybe lol. 

 

Trying to understand why we are so corrupt with selections. 

 

Guess if you look at the young gen talents, they are quality but none are really marketable.

 

Pant is an outlier. He talks smack. He knows how to rile opponents. He is. Marketable. Although his physique needs work. 

 

Others not so much. 

Marketability comes with time and success, Prasidh Krishna and Siraj has that attitude, Bishnoi don't speak much but his body language is uptight, Jaiswal is another one who is mentally strong and can rile up the opposition if needed.

 

Secondly in IPL, new players hardly go verbal or aggressive due to the "Fair Play" drama. Only seniors has the freedom to go full maa behen as they have a fan army to shield on SM.

Link to comment
6 hours ago, wazza said:

so much corruption. but wouldnt india winning help? i had a think about it. Apparently given how popular cricket is, winning actually doesnt help india much. its marketability of players that help boost indian revenue. Thats why we will always play seniors who are established and have a name. Also, other nations winning help create rivalries. it boosts sales. If india continue to win, hypothetically speaking, cricket's popularity will decline. t20 is the right format to garner exposure. Makes more sense to see india come close and then lose. we will get the occasional win ofcourse but given how our management runs things, we wont win an icc title for the next few years i guess. 

 

So then it’s good right.?

India is benefitting from losing icc trophies,and obviously as an Indian citizen you would take Indias prosperity over a win in some random sport.

to fir what’s the problem, sab changa si

Link to comment
On 7/2/2023 at 7:52 PM, Lord said:

 

Stats say he only played 6 games with moderate returns

 

In FC, Harshit Rana averages 26+ with a SR of 41. Has 23 wickets from 6 games. That is quite good.

 

Moreover, one has to see him.actually bowl in FC games to get thd true feel. He is a big hearted pacer who keeps bowling with effort throughout the day. Pounds the deck hard but can move the fuller ball at pace too.

 

Such pacers can be invaluable.

Edited by express bowling
Link to comment
16 hours ago, Sooda said:

 

 

 

 

I think the selectors get unfair stick from people here for this. Where are these pace men who the selectors are ignoring?

 

If anything it is the opposite: Sen, Prasidh, Dayal been given chances but unfortunately injury cut them short.

 

Umran has played for the A team despite little FC experience, and ahead of more seasoned campaigners PURELY based on his pace.

 

People here love Kartik Tyagi, he has played only two FC match and one of that was for India A.

 

Any pacemen with promise is getting opportunities. Unfortunately there are not many of those and some of those who are around are injured.

 

Prasidh Krishna is yet to debut in tests despite having an exceptional bowling average in FC cricket. His injury is recent.

 

Siraj debuted 2 years too late. Was doing massively well for Indua A in 2018.

 

Kuldeep Sen is sidelined after a minor injury. He was devastating in the Irani Cup. But Unadkat is in the test squad despite a minor injury. 

 

Mukesh Kumar is in the India ODI squad despite averaging 37 in List A and having a poor IPL.

Edited by express bowling
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Adamant said:

So then it’s good right.?

India is benefitting from losing icc trophies,and obviously as an Indian citizen you would take Indias prosperity over a win in some random sport.

to fir what’s the problem, sab changa si

Well look at the selections we make. It's right in the face. We will win once we start marking proper selections. 

These days players can't just be talented. They need to be marketable otherwise you won't get picked. Or atleast  connections. 

Link to comment
11 hours ago, wazza said:

Too much pak passion reading maybe lol. 

 

Trying to understand why we are so corrupt with selections. 

 

Guess if you look at the young gen talents, they are quality but none are really marketable.

 

Pant is an outlier. He talks smack. He knows how to rile opponents. He is. Marketable. Although his physique needs work. 

 

Others not so much. 

Haha..I hope instead of making individuals marketable..they make whole team marketable

Link to comment
9 hours ago, express bowling said:

5 wickets in the SF match.

 

Plus runs in both innings. 

 

Going from strength to strength. 

Problem is his team got knocked out.

SZ and WZ are full of Trundlers, one of them will perform in finale and will become talk of the town.

 

Last year Sen blew everyone with his bowling in VHT, but his team got knocked out early, while Undacut's Saurashtra went till finale and he was able to overtake Sen in terms of wickets.

 

Even selectors watch only the semis and finals...all they see there is 130 kph line length Trundlers and then they select from that lot.

Edited by singhvivek141
Link to comment
On 7/11/2023 at 1:31 PM, singhvivek141 said:

Problem is his team got knocked out.

SZ and WZ are full of Trundlers, one of them will perform in finale and will become talk of the town.

 

Last year Sen blew everyone with his bowling in VHT, but his team got knocked out early, while Undacut's Saurashtra went till finale and he was able to overtake Sen in terms of wickets.

 

Even selectors watch only the semis and finals...all they see there is 130 kph line length Trundlers and then they select from that lot.

they love 120 kph trundlers who are short, float the ball up, and are meek enough to offer their derrieres for being whipped. brings out the fetishes in these selectors

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Vijy said:

oooh yes, and Mohd Zahid bowls at 170 kph. what else?

 

Win in an age group tournament and delusional and over the top statements are filling this forum.  Some of them from people who are ashamed of stating their nationality.  

 

Meanwhile, realiity is that, after Waqar Younis, Pakistan has not produced a seamer who has taken 200 test wickets 

Link to comment
5 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

Win in an age group tournament and delusional and over the top statements are filling this forum.  Some of them from people who are ashamed of stating their nationality.  

 

Meanwhile, realiity is that, after Waqar Younis, Pakistan has not produced a seamer who has taken 200 test wickets 

What's funny is Indians wallops them in any physical contest too. 

 

Also india dominates in wrestling for commonwealth games.

Link to comment
5 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

Win in an age group tournament and delusional and over the top statements are filling this forum.  Some of them from people who are ashamed of stating their nationality.  

 

Meanwhile, realiity is that, after Waqar Younis, Pakistan has not produced a seamer who has taken 200 test wickets 

What's funny is Indians wallops them in any physical contest too. 

 

Also india dominates in wrestling for commonwealth games.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...