Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Congress built Modi and made him famous. Similar to Democrats mocking DJT in the 2011-15 era and made him famous. Their own fault

 

 

 

Actually Bernie is the reason why DJT became relevant. GOP owes him massively. He did vote-split big time. Trump stole his platform and reached out to the same people that Sanders reached out to in rust belt where Bernie beat Hillary easily.  Democrats went with "seniority quota" much like BCCI does these days. They got their reality check. They still didn't learn. A candidate should resonate with voters. Obama did twice. People rallied around him so much so they wanted third term.  DJT also got lucky with women as opponent twice. First was atleast qualified. Second was pathetic. Credit to him for winning the primary. But national level win was due to these factors.

 

Having said that, GOP also made fun of Biden last year, they called Michelle obama monkey in 2008.  Look where they ended up. This happens on both sides.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Actually Bernie is the reason why DJT became relevant. GOP owes him massively. He did vote-split big time. Trump stole his platform and reached out to the same people that Sanders reached out to in rust belt where Bernie beat Hillary easily.  Democrats went with "seniority quota" much like BCCI does these days. They got their reality check. They still didn't learn. A candidate should resonate with voters. Obama did twice. People rallied around him so much so they wanted third term.  DJT also got lucky with women as opponent twice. First was atleast qualified. Second was pathetic. Credit to him for winning the primary. But national level win was due to these factors.

 

Having said that, GOP also made fun of Biden last year, they called Michelle obama monkey in 2008.  Look where they ended up. This happens on both sides.

This is some pipe conspiracy theory. Bernie voters got miffed and voted for DJT in the presidential election ? 
 

Why are you defending media and Dems with your whataboutry? I said Dems and media made DJT famous more than he worked for it

Edited by coffee_rules
Posted
2 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

This is a conspiracy theory. How did Biden win then? So that would make EVM fraud accusation in India even more credible.

how does not requiring ID to vote in USA affect EVM voting in India, where you dont just need an ID, you need a SPECIFIC ID - voter card, else you cant vote ?

India isnt ballot-stuffing kangaroo elections like murrica and last i checked, we can count 800 million votes in 1 day, not take a week like idiot murrica.

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

how does not requiring ID to vote in USA affect EVM voting in India, where you dont just need an ID, you need a SPECIFIC ID - voter card, else you cant vote ?

India isnt ballot-stuffing kangaroo elections like murrica and last i checked, we can count 800 million votes in 1 day, not take a week like idiot murrica.

 

 

Yeah counting in Arizona is a joke.

 

 

 

 

Posted
26 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Actually Bernie is the reason why DJT became relevant. GOP owes him massively. He did vote-split big time. Trump stole his platform and reached out to the same people that Sanders reached out to in rust belt where Bernie beat Hillary easily.  Democrats went with "seniority quota" much like BCCI does these days. They got their reality check. They still didn't learn. A candidate should resonate with voters. Obama did twice. People rallied around him so much so they wanted third term.  DJT also got lucky with women as opponent twice. First was atleast qualified. Second was pathetic. Credit to him for winning the primary. But national level win was due to these factors.

 

Having said that, GOP also made fun of Biden last year, they called Michelle obama monkey in 2008.  Look where they ended up. This happens on both sides.


This was Obama 4.0. It was his people running the Harris campaign. It’s not just a Harris loss, Obama as well. Why was a former president & wife so involved there.

 

Obama, telling black voters what to do, ultimately costed. Nobody wants to be told at constantly, or how they can’t think for themselves. “Uneducated white women” is another often used term this election, its disrespectful and thus introspection is needed. It wasn’t just a Trump win, Dems lost for their own actions.

 

Posted
30 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

This is some pipe conspiracy theory. Bernie voters got miffed and voted for DJT in the presidential election ? 
 

Why are you defending media and Dems with your whataboutry? I said Dems and media made DJT famous more than he worked for it

 

No. Bernie voters stayed home. Voter turn out was impacted. It is a fact. Ther eis no way Trump beating Bernie in rust belt area where he was massively popular

Posted
2 minutes ago, someone said:


This was Obama 4.0. It was his people running the Harris campaign. It’s not just a Harris loss, Obama as well. Why was a former president & wife so involved there.

 

Obama, telling black voters what to do, ultimately costed. Nobody wants to be told at constantly, or how they can’t think for themselves. “Uneducated white women” is another often used term this election, its disrespectful and thus introspection is needed. It wasn’t just a Trump win, Dems lost for their own actions.

 

 

Not true. Come on dude. The way Obama presented himself was not even close to how Kamala did. Kamala could not even get single vote in primary. Obama beat Hillary the most popular candidate at that time in the primary convincingly. Then he won both elections convincingly. He carried states like Ohio.He  reached out to working class. Kamala was a show pony. 

Posted
1 minute ago, vvvslaxman said:

I called out why Kamal will lose badly well before election. It happened exactly for those reasons.  Everything else is fictional.

did you call out DJT winning record amount of Indo-american and latino votes as a vote % ? 

 

Also explain to us why no ID in america casts a shadow over EVM voting in India ? India is strict about ID. Explain.

 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Muloghonto said:

did you call out DJT winning record amount of Indo-american and latino votes as a vote % ? 

 

Also explain to us why no ID in america casts a shadow over EVM voting in India ? India is strict about ID. Explain.

 

 

That is because voter id restrictions made it very hard for citizens to vote. They have other mechanisms to verify. Atleast read why it is set up that way before asking. Each state has details about that. Republicans don't want many people to vote. Too many restrictions were introduced so that poor people could not vote. But they have other mechanism to verify it. Don't eat everything right wing conspiracy nut jobs feed you. 

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

Not true. Come on dude. The way Obama presented himself was not even close to how Kamala did. Kamala could not even get single vote in primary. Obama beat Hillary the most popular candidate at that time in the primary convincingly. Then he won both elections convincingly. He carried states like Ohio.He  reached out to working class. Kamala was a show pony. 


You missed the point. Obama & his associates were running her campaign. So they deserve the criticism for the loss.

 

They thought they could just repeat on 2008, now with a young black woman and everything else being irrelevant. She had weak knowledge, repeatful, and her lack any spontaneity.  

 

They also had an unnatural alliance of the left, lgbts, islamists, minorities,  and united  through common goal of “hate Trump”. Yet, Israel issue exposed some faultines.

 


Posted
4 minutes ago, coffee_rules said:

Wiped clean Blue wall states have been painted red all over inside. 

 

GbymG0Qa8AANS9v?format=jpg&name=medium
 

6 more than he got against Hilarious . She won NV 6 votes , but rest look the same as 2024

 

Only few counties decide these election. THey don't even need election for most of these states. Just have election for 7 or 8 swing states be done with it. 

Posted

It's also interesting how the mantle of cognitive decline ebbs and flows between democrats and republicans. Along with their supporters. During bush era, general democrat line on abortion, gay marriage, war, working class labour made sense. Obama era actually he had everyone captivated and again his supporters looked saner. Then between 2016 and 2020, democrats lost their balance and went full woke. Between 2020 and 2024, they got worse and some got disillusioned and went with trump. 

 

Even now I see a clear lack of reasoning and critical abilities of democrats and their supporters. When actually they are supposed to be better placed and better read. I think broad gap is because one side is believing mainstream media and other side has moved on. Democrats including Indian ones are as insular as an average American. Echo chamber has caused atrophy. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

That is because voter id restrictions made it very hard for citizens to vote. They have other mechanisms to verify. Atleast read why it is set up that way before asking. Each state has details about that. Republicans don't want many people to vote. Too many restrictions were introduced so that poor people could not vote. But they have other mechanism to verify it. Don't eat everything right wing conspiracy nut jobs feed you. 

 

 

Its the citizen's job to carry voter ID like its a citizen's job to arrange for and carry a driver's license. 

There is no mechanism to verify. 

But i am more interested in you throwing Indian voting system under the bus and saying this 'conspiracy' of no voter ID check also draws into question EVM voting. Explain how. 

I dont follow RW anything to feed me. I literally have lived in murrica for decades, i still own a home there, all i have to do is reach out to 10 people in the states where there is no ID check and ask them for what their voting procedure was. Like i did with Coffee in this very forum itself.

So please dont eat everything left wing conspiracy nut jobs feed you - there is no vote authentication mechanism in those said states. You say who you are and as long as you know the address of the person, you can vote. 

An ex of mine got to vote this election on a wrong name - she got married in the last 4 years and her last name doesnt match the voter rolls, but it was STILL okay for her to vote - that kind of kangaroo system doesnt happen in India, so explain your gungadeen style swipe at Indian elections.

Edited by Muloghonto
Posted
1 minute ago, someone said:


You missed the point. Obama & his associates were running her campaign. So they deserve the criticism for the loss.

 

They thought they could just repeat on 2008, now with a young black woman and everything else being irrelevant. She had weak knowledge, repeatful, and her lack any spontaneity.  

 

They also had an unnatural alliance of the left, lgbts, islamists, minorities,  and united  through common goal of “hate Trump”. Yet, Israel issue exposed some faultines.

 

 

 

It doesn't matter Clinton had presidency record. Just because he rooted someone doesn't mean they will win. Candidate has to be strong. Appealing. She was a bumbling idiot. Heck even i didn't vote for her. My wife didn't vote for her. But we did vote dems down ballot.

Posted
2 minutes ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

That is because voter id restrictions made it very hard for citizens to vote. They have other mechanisms to verify. Atleast read why it is set up that way before asking. Each state has details about that. Republicans don't want many people to vote. Too many restrictions were introduced so that poor people could not vote. But they have other mechanism to verify it. Don't eat everything right wing conspiracy nut jobs feed you. 

 

 

 

What are those other mechanisms to verify ?

Posted
Just now, Muloghonto said:

Its the citizen's job to carry voter ID like its a citizen's job to arrange for and carry a driver's license. 

There is no mechanism to verify. 

But i am more interested in you throwing Indian voting system under the bus and saying this 'conspiracy' of no voter ID check also draws into question EVM voting. Explain how. 

 

You have to be registered to vote.  You have live near there. ONe of the historical tactic of Republicans is voter suppression. They know people becoming more and more left leaning. So they do all kind of tactics to do voter suppression. This is anti-democratic. So Trump started gaslighting "voter fraud voter fraud" parrotting the same conspiracy theories from far right wing channels.  More the times you say it more the chances of sticking. Actually some of the guys who were caught for fraud voting were Trump supporters attempting to vote on behalf of his wife or relative.

×
×
  • Create New...