Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Owaisi low key cooked here.  Notice Jaishankar said minorities but Owaisi specifically asked about Hindus:hatsoff:  sooner laser eyes goes the better will never trust this guy coz of conflict of interest allegations 

 

Posted
On 12/9/2024 at 1:27 PM, mishra said:

That was a right question to ask which i posed to all so called Hindu lovers and strategic experts just so that they can see other side as well.

 

BTW, China holding talks with Myanmar rebels. Something is cooking 

lol Myanmar has so many factions and China understood the junta is done. AA is top dog now and even captured the commander of the junta for the border. It seems more complex junta pushed out Rohingya and now they formed an alliance with Rohingya to attack AA.

Posted
3 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Owaisi low key cooked here.  Notice Jaishankar said minorities but Owaisi specifically asked about Hindus:hatsoff:  sooner laser eyes goes the better will never trust this guy coz of conflict of interest allegations 

 


Shouldn’t Buddhists, Sikhs and Jains be part of minorities? 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, gattaca said:


Shouldn’t Buddhists, Sikhs and Jains be part of minorities? 

Their temples are getting burnt and Priests getting arrested?  They are being called India agents?

 

The guy couldn't answer at all.  Keep supplying them free eggs and 

I hate to admit I am legit impressed that Owaisi gagged him when he asked about cheap textile dumping here & destroying local powerloom industry.  Ummah ki bhi le li

 

Laser eyes was choking.  Pathetic 

Edited by Lone Wolf
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Owaisi low key cooked here.  Notice Jaishankar said minorities but Owaisi specifically asked about Hindus:hatsoff:  sooner laser eyes goes the better will never trust this guy coz of conflict of interest allegations 

 

Razakars will remain a Razakar. This language of Owaisi is to attack/weaken  BJP which everyone thinks is based on Hindu vot s and unification.

 

Ask him to question on treatment of Hindus in Kashmir under Pre NDA era or even current era

Edited by mishra
Posted
8 hours ago, mishra said:

Razakars will remain a Razakar. This language of Owaisi is to attack/weaken  BJP which everyone thinks is based on Hindu vot s and unification.

 

Ask him to question on treatment of Hindus in Kashmir under Pre NDA era or even current era

Important is he is questioning.  These questions should have been asked by Congress and Clueless RaGa but they are busy with constitution raag..  pata nhi konsi ghatiya strategy le ke baith gye hai

Posted
2 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Important is he is questioning.  These questions should have been asked by Congress and Clueless RaGa but they are busy with constitution raag..  pata nhi konsi ghatiya strategy le ke baith gye hai

No, Read ur history. Handful of Turks ruled India till Brits came using similar tactics of dividing Hindus. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Lone Wolf said:

Arakan rebels are under CCP Control... This is massive indeed.

Who told you? Chinese were on side of military 

Edited by mishra
Posted
3 hours ago, mishra said:

Who told you? Chinese were on side of military 

They are allied with some Chinese backed rebels in Myanmar. 

I think India in March/April also had some sorta peace deal with them.

It has sorta curbed drug trafficking along Indo Myanmar border 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, mishra said:

No, Read ur history. Handful of Turks ruled India till Brits came using similar tactics of dividing Hindus. 

Idk how is that relevant.  Turks ruling India is solely based on them employing better fighting techniques and modern warfare and horse archers with fast moving infantry.

Indians were caught napping.  This is what Happened to Prithviraj in second battle of Tarain.

He had 50-60k going by conservative historical figures against 10k + Horse archery contingent of Ghurids.

Same story when Babur came up Lodhis then cannons were the clincher.

 

Divide and rule tactics were successfully employed by British coz people were fed up with Indian monarchs.  It's historical proof Common folks didn't support 1857 coz of same reason. 

Edited by Lone Wolf
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

They are allied with some Chinese backed rebels in Myanmar. 

I think India in March/April also had some sorta peace deal with them.

It has sorta curbed drug trafficking along Indo Myanmar border 

Military junta was in pocket of Chinese. It makes sense because most land on which BRI is going is under military junta. Rakine state where Rohingya issue exists is under AA. That Port which Yunus wanted to give to Americans , AA guys are not letting Bongs to even do fishing in region. Its complicated. Fortunately I have few friends from NE  and keep getting updates on various tensions.

Edited by mishra
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Lone Wolf said:

Idk how is that relevant.  Turks ruling India is solely based on them employing better fighting techniques and modern warfare and horse archers with fast moving infantry.

Indians were caught napping.  This is what Happened to Prithviraj in second battle of Tarain.

He had 50-60k going by conservative historical figures against 10k + Horse archery contingent of Ghurids.

Same story when Babur came up Lodhis then cannons were the clincher.

 

Divide and rule tactics were successfully employed by British coz people were fed up with Indian monarchs.  It's historical proof Common folks didn't support 1857 coz of same reason. 

Some time you need to visit history. Common Sense question. Ask yourself.

 

How did Turks ruled India for 800 years. Was it beacuse they managed to defeat some king in some battle or , ruling a country which is not your people,your religion, your customs, meant employing some tactics to supplement the brute Power. What was that Elephant in room which most Indian non History Student ignore to see or GoI has intentionally hidden is school level history text books.

 

How did Islam came and propogated in Bengal or down South? @Muloghonto

Edited by mishra
Posted
5 minutes ago, mishra said:

Military junta was in pocket of Chinese. It makes sense because most land on which BRI is going is under military junta. Rakine state where Rohingya issue exists is under AA. That Port which Yunus wanted to give to Americans , AA guys are not letting Bongs to even do fishing. Its complicated. Fortunately I have few friends from NE  and keep getting updates on various tensions.

Yeah actually there are two Rebel groups with same name... Arakan Rebels is Buddhist one & other is Arakan Rohingya Rebel faction.

 

The Buddhist one is more powerful and that has CCP connection. And made Peace Deal with India in March.

 

There is another theory that this is a step in formation of  Christian state in the area which has US blessing.

We will have to see how this plays out.

Posted

Meanwhile Congress owner Priyanka Gandhi Vadhara is making political statements by carrying a bag with “Palestine” printed on it in Indian parliament. 
 

Only Hindus of Bangladesh or even Hindus in general are supposed to be boycotted by this family.

Posted

Ok. Its getting clearer now.

1. American +West Support Yunus

2. American +West Support Rohingya

3. Chinese Support Burmese General

4. Chinese in talks with Arakan Army

 

 

Indian Position is a bit more complicated, I think its developing.

 

Now, Confirmed news is that Chinese are sending their own Private Army into Myanmar to protect BRI. 

 

Probably Americans are hoping to make a Afghan War part 2.

Posted

Doval in China. Something is cooking. We have to be mindful that Myanmar path into Indian ocean is only alternative patvh China has in event of direct blockade by US and allies(India is just a partner, Pakistan’s CPEC will stop if US blockade happens). Think India Russia China are on same page when it comes to Bangladesh 

×
×
  • Create New...