Was 100-17 worst ever batting collapse by ICT?

[Ultimate_Game]

13 minutes ago, Vk1 said:

I think we can handle only one - either swing or bounce. When both come together as a package we will lose the game unless there is an exceptional individual performance.

 

I've never seen us handle swing or seam

[AKane]

I think this was the worst in 1952 - England 347/9  and India 58 and 82. England won by an Innings and 207 runs.

 

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/india-tour-of-england-1952-62273/england-vs-india-3rd-test-62739/full-scorecard

 

 

 

Edited October 20, 2024 by AKane

[Ultimate_Game]

29 minutes ago, AKane said:

I think this was the worst in 1952 - England 347/9  and India 58 and 82. England won by an Innings and 207 runs.

 

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/india-tour-of-england-1952-62273/england-vs-india-3rd-test-62739/full-scorecard

 

 

 

 

Those were amateur days (till 70s). Wouldn't really consider anything before  80s.

[Vk1]

2 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

I've never seen us handle swing or seam

We did okayish in Eng ( high swing/seam) and much better in Aus ( bounce ) recently. We perform below par in SA where it does both.

[Lord]

2 hours ago, AKane said:

I think this was the worst in 1952 - England 347/9  and India 58 and 82. England won by an Innings and 207 runs.

 

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/india-tour-of-england-1952-62273/england-vs-india-3rd-test-62739/full-scorecard

 

 

 

 

Bowlers should have won us that

[Lord]

2 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

I've never seen us handle swing or seam

 

We were good in Fab 4 era, specially Headingley Test 2002

[putrevus]

12 minutes ago, Lord said:

 

We were good in Fab 4 era, specially Headingley Test 2002

Who were the bowlers then.