AKane Posted December 2, 2025 Posted December 2, 2025 6 hours ago, vvvslaxman said: Yea.. but we succumbed to scoreboard pressure more than anything else. We just choked. SCG is typically a friendly wicket for subcontinent teams. We started well and superstars went missing. Scoreboard pressure existed because only Umesh and Mohit took 6 wickets in that match. Ashwin got 1 and Shami and Jadeja nil. A few more wickets from Ashwin/Shami/Jadeja and the score might have been less that 300. For example Warner was a monster in that WC - he scored 12 off of 7 balls with a six and four in first Umesh over but fell on first ball of second over. Had that wicket not happened, the score might have been 378 instead of 328.
nevada Posted December 2, 2025 Posted December 2, 2025 14 hours ago, AKane said: Interestingly both tests won in England were with Bumrah not playing and the minnow level bowlers bowling...... True. Other bowlers were upping their level in his absence, which they can do for a game or two, but not forever.
AKane Posted December 2, 2025 Posted December 2, 2025 9 hours ago, nevada said: True. Other bowlers were upping their level in his absence, which they can do for a game or two, but not forever. That remains to be seen .... but yes for some reason they under perform when playing along sides Bumrah. Very strange.
vvvslaxman Posted December 2, 2025 Author Posted December 2, 2025 33 minutes ago, AKane said: That remains to be seen .... but yes for some reason they under perform when playing along sides Bumrah. Very strange. It wasn't the case when we had Ishant and Shami bowled with Bumrah. Infact their stats look better with Bumrah.
AKane Posted December 2, 2025 Posted December 2, 2025 1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said: It wasn't the case when we had Ishant and Shami bowled with Bumrah. Infact their stats look better with Bumrah. Maybe Ishant and Shami are treated differently when bowling with Bumrah vs say a Siraj. Even in the Kolkata match Bumrah opened the bowling but Siraj came on after over 51 in the second innings. That when Bumrah and spinners were having trouble with the last 2 wickets. Even in the fifth test we lost to England after suspending the tour at 4 matches couple of seasons back - Just check where Siraj and Thakur got to bowl as Bumrah and Shami hogged the ball. BTW we lost that test.
Lord Posted December 2, 2025 Posted December 2, 2025 2 hours ago, AKane said: That remains to be seen .... but yes for some reason they under perform when playing along sides Bumrah. Very strange. Sense of responsibility is bit less.
helperononline Posted December 9, 2025 Posted December 9, 2025 He seems to be bowling well in domestic cricket Dunno why they not allowing him in the team when he is in peak form.
IndianRenegade Posted December 9, 2025 Posted December 9, 2025 2 hours ago, helperononline said: He seems to be bowling well in domestic cricket Dunno why they not allowing him in the team when he is in peak form. He was one of the most important bowler in 2023 wc, he has an injury & gets unceremoniously dumped but Sadesa who hasn’t done anything in LOI since eternity gets a place. the favouritism is appalling.
vvvslaxman Posted July 19 Author Posted July 19 Mo Shami He is going to be the biggest loss in ODIs. There is no one remotely in the vicinity of his class. Akash deep is okayish in tests in similar mould. In ODI not even close. Insidious 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now