Jump to content

Please no Chakri in Final


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, Ultimate_Game said:

 

He needs to be persisted with at Ahmedabad. The only change we need to make is replace Abhishek with Rinku. I really don't see Abhishek doing anything when NZ opens with McCochie and follow it up with Phillips. They also have Santner and Rachin who're bowling well. Against such a spin-heavy attack I don't see Abhishek doing much and better to push Ishan to open with Rinku at 7. We get a better fielder as well as a result.

Siraj isn't upgrade to anyone that is universal truth,while Varun is bowling like a chicken and trying to escape as soon as possible,infact with Siraj we haven't won any ICC event,that's also true

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Suhaan said:

Siraj isn't upgrade to anyone that is universal truth,while Varun is bowling like a chicken and trying to escape as soon as possible,infact with Siraj we haven't won any ICC event,that's also true

 

 

In fact the team has improved everytime he has been dropped and replaced. He failed in the 2023 WC final, was dropped in the knockout stage of 2024 WT20 which we won, and was dropped from the CT squad as well which we again ended up winning.

 

Siraj is not a game-changer and generally is a SL basher who goes missing against better teams. He should be played only in Tests and not a good fit for LOIs. He lacks control, has no variety, is a poor fielder, can't hold a bat and goes for runs when attacked. He's worse than both Varun and Kuldeep and TBH shouldn't have been part of the WT20 squad. I would take Harshal Patel over him coz at least Harshal Patel can bowl his slower ones on this slow pitch.

 

Stick with Varun or replace him with Kuldeep (I don't agree though) but no Siraj. On this pitch the ball will come on to the bat and he'll go for 50+ in his 4 overs and probably drop a sitter.

Posted
1 hour ago, Suhaan said:

Siraj isn't upgrade to anyone that is universal truth,while Varun is bowling like a chicken and trying to escape as soon as possible,infact with Siraj we haven't won any ICC event,that's also true

 

Varun's strength has been negated. Unfortunately he doesn't have the ability to slow the pace all the way down to like 70 kph. When he gets hit he bowls at 100 kph making the life even easier.

Posted
4 hours ago, vvvslaxman said:

Varun's strength has been negated. Unfortunately he doesn't have the ability to slow the pace all the way down to like 70 kph. When he gets hit he bowls at 100 kph making the life even easier.

this is where the coaching matters and has been a big let down this tournament.the no 1 batsman and no 1 Bowler are now our worst players and yet they are doing exactly what they have been  doing before the WC and nothing has changed.a simple change for Abhishek like not going for lofted shots against Off  spin or bowling slower and giving it more reps for Varun would have been a great start.

Posted
44 minutes ago, deepdynamo said:

One final chance for Varun to redeem himself. He is a bit iffy when in panic mode but then Kuldeep is also same.

Mitchell is the best vs kully. But in a match up with Finn Allen Kully has a better chance

Posted
On 3/7/2026 at 10:19 AM, Ultimate_Game said:

 

In fact the team has improved everytime he has been dropped and replaced. He failed in the 2023 WC final, was dropped in the knockout stage of 2024 WT20 which we won, and was dropped from the CT squad as well which we again ended up winning.

 

Siraj is not a game-changer and generally is a SL basher who goes missing against better teams. He should be played only in Tests and not a good fit for LOIs. He lacks control, has no variety, is a poor fielder, can't hold a bat and goes for runs when attacked. He's worse than both Varun and Kuldeep and TBH shouldn't have been part of the WT20 squad. I would take Harshal Patel over him coz at least Harshal Patel can bowl his slower ones on this slow pitch.

 

Stick with Varun or replace him with Kuldeep (I don't agree though) but no Siraj. On this pitch the ball will come on to the bat and he'll go for 50+ in his 4 overs and probably drop a sitter.

Most of our bowling options are garbage! How did we end up like this? Why weren't other options tried? 

Posted
9 minutes ago, nevada said:

Most of our bowling options are garbage! How did we end up like this? Why weren't other options tried? 

 

On a road 10 an over is good figures if you ask me.  But 15 an over is not. So we need defensive bowlers on roads. Krunal pandya type. I think Bishnoi has potential to be a defensive bowler as his trajectory is very low. He may go for runs from time to time.But an option to consider on road wickets.

Posted
1 hour ago, vvvslaxman said:

 

On a road 10 an over is good figures if you ask me.  But 15 an over is not. So we need defensive bowlers on roads. Krunal pandya type. I think Bishnoi has potential to be a defensive bowler as his trajectory is very low. He may go for runs from time to time.But an option to consider on road wickets.

For roads, multi dimensional cricketers are a must. Krunal can make up with the bat. Even Bishnoi can score 10-12 runs. One dimensional players like Kuldip, VC, Siraj etc should not be picked on roads. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...