coffee_rules Posted June 12, 2008 Posted June 12, 2008 He might be laundering money or legit'ing his black business. This picture is pretty lame. It shows he is buying the people with money. I wouldn't have posed in front of 20 mil dollars if I was IVAR. Interestingly Jackass Miller also thinks so to... Opinion | Andrew Miller >> A bloodless coup There is more than just a hint of cowboy about the way in which the ECB has leapt into bed with Allen Stanford, the first and highest bidder Show me the money: Allen Stanford poses with US$20 million © Getty Images If there were any doubts remaining as to whether Allen Stanford planned to back up his lofty words with deeds, consider them blown away once and for all. The breezy whirring of his jet-black helicopter's rotor-blades did for that, as he and his cast of all-stars swooped in as if from Antigua itself, to perform a bloodless coup at the very home of English cricket. Lord's has never before seen anything quite like this. Less than 24 hours earlier, the ground had played host to Archbishop Desmond Tutu, invited by the MCC to deliver the annual Cowdrey Lecture on the Spirit of Cricket. But the traditional values espoused then were nowhere to be seen now, as English cricket put dignity to one side and embarked on the biggest cash-grab the game has ever seen. Down swooped the chopper, the legend "Stanford" emblazoned in gold letters along the side. It paused momentarily above the square of the Nursery ground, rotated 360 degrees, then came to rest by a freshly painted "H" in the outfield. It's fairly apparent what impression this was meant to give, but the din of the descent was more Apocalypse Now than Opportunity Knocks. Trepidation, slight nausea and wide-eyed intrigue were the overriding emotions for the entourage of journalists invited to witness the dawn of English cricket's brave new era. As the engines were cut, Stanford emerged triumphant into the light, pointing cheerily into the middle distance in that matey manner so beloved by US presidents, with his entourage following closely behind him. Sir Vivian Richards, Sir Everton Weekes, Richie Richardson, Curtly Ambrose and Desmond Haynes arrived by air, along with the WICB president, Julian Hunte, while Sir Garry Sobers joined them at ground level moments after landing. By then, the ECB delegation had already marched out to meet him. The chairman, Giles Clarke, led the way, strutting to the middle as if keen to present himself as an equal partner (though General Jodl at Reims came more readily to mind). But it was his sidekick, David Collier, who gave a truer indication of England's standing in this arrangement. He was unable to decide whether handshakes or hugs were appropriate for Texan royalty, and so ended up performing a floppy chest-bump that was exquisite in its awkwardness. There's no question that Stanford's involvement with West Indies cricket has been a force for good, but English cricket is not flatlining quite so drastically as to require this degree of mouth-to-mouth resuscitation And there is something undoubtedly awkward about all this, although it would be wrong to be out-and-out cynical. Money is something that English cricket desperately needs, both to promote the game domestically and to compete at boardroom level internationally, and let's not forget that, back in 2003, the entire English media (and I include myself) was wrong in its initial impression of the Twenty20 Cup. But in keeping with the Texan connection, there is more than just a hint of cowboy about the way in which the ECB has leapt into bed with the first and highest bidder. That sense of unease had been fuelled as we waited for the arrival. As various scenarios were speculated upon by the journalists, one of the tabloid reporters stated baldly that Richards and Sir Ian Botham would be making cameo appearances in November's inaugural winner-takes-all game, to provide some "legendary" pizzazz. It soon turned out he was joking, but it was a measure of the moment that no one could seriously write such a suggestion off. And then there was the décor. All around the Nursery pavilion, placards had been hung on the walls with grand motivational quotes plucked from history. The one that caught my eye came from Rudyard Kipling's "If". "If you can make one heap of all your winnings. And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss," were the chosen lines. The next two words, as if anyone needs reminding are: "And lose". Too much of this arrangement seems out of context with the game that we have known and loved for generations, but Clarke has taken his gambler's instinct and made a break for the big-time. Stanford's presidential-style arrival at Lord's © Getty Images At what cost, however, remains to be seen. There's no question that Stanford's involvement with West Indies cricket has been a force for good - the team's recent improved form undoubtedly stems from the improved sense of worth and identity that his competition has brought to the region, not to mention the riches. And yet, English cricket is not flatlining quite so drastically as to require this degree of mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. In fact, there is a fine line between a kiss of life and a smothering, because the greatest fear about the day's events was the one that Stanford singularly failed to allay. When asked his opinion of Test cricket, he responded baldly: "I find it boring, but I'm not a purist." Then, in a sweeping metaphor about the architecture at Lord's, he went on to liken the "1700s" pavilion to the Test game, and the "Eye in the Sky" media centre to Twenty20s. "Test cricket is the foundation, that's where cricket came from. Twenty20 is the future, that's where the money is." It's not a ringing endorsement for traditional values, and on today of all days, Clarke was not about to leap to Test cricket's defence. "He's more than entitled to his opinions," Clarke retorted. "We've made it very clear how highly we regard Test cricket in this country, we think England is the home of Test cricket." How much longer can this remain the case, however. The only man in Stanford's line-up who spoke out on the old game's behalf was Botham, who also looked as though he'd strolled off the golf course with a Pringle sweater draped over his shoulders. But even his words were lost amid the glitz. Botham, remember, refused to go to the ICC World Twenty20 because he thought the format was a joke. Something's changed his mind, and it's probably the very same thing that has turned the ECB's heads. Stanford is no fool, but nor is he a philanthropist. He wants a return on his investment, and - as the tagline from Jerry Maguire goes - he expects the ECB to show him the money. With that in mind, he decided to flash the cash himself, and onto the sleek, black, neon-lit stage, he wheeled a vast cabinet full of 50 dollar bills. So that's what US$20 million looks like - it's also what England's future looks like. Nothing about this game is ever going to be the same. Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo
Cricketics Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Stanford arrested after giving out millions, he has been arrested. it was good until his lap dance thing lasted..
Cricketics Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 source? Cricinfo yaar. ismein kya source chahiyeh. Har Jagha laga wah hai.
Laaloo Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/ci/content/current/story/391239.html
coffee_rules Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Unproven assets, false documents of assets..He is the Raju Ramalingam of Antigua!
Sachinism Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Poor WI where will they get money from now
Kohum Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 WI players should have gotten their money. Where will ECB get their sponsor now?
Laaloo Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Onus on the BCCI for refusing to deal with Stanford. now only if Paki players had agreed to do some business with Stanford :(
Dirty_South Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Onus on the BCCI for refusing to deal with Stanford. now only if Paki players had agreed to do some business with Stanford :( How i wish that wud have happened :((
cowboysfan Posted February 18, 2009 Posted February 18, 2009 stanford has gone into hiding-this would have been funny apart from the fact that it is also so tragic.
SachDan Posted February 22, 2009 Posted February 22, 2009 Allan Stanford, a sleazebag: Kevin Pietersen The England and Wales Cricket Board decided to sever all ties with Stanford followed the charges levelled at him on Tuesday by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in his native America. It accuses the financier of masterminding a fraud totalling $9.2 billion in value. England players will lose out financially after the collapse of the lucrative Twenty20 deal but Pietersen is not unhappy about the end of the relationship. "Stanford was a sleazebag. I was very uncomfortable with the whole Stanford thing," he told the News of the World. Pietersen had a deal with Stanford to promote the infamous winner-takes-all clash between England and the Stanford Superstars in November last year, which ended in an embarrassing defeat for England. He said: "It was not that I was captain at the time, it was the uncomfortable situation of everybody thinking the England team had been sold. "With the financial state of the world, people were talking about money instead of cricket. "Those kind of things just didn't seem right to me, so it's not a bad thing we are not going to have that tournament any more. "I was an ambassador for Stanford - a player face - but that contract has gone. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cricket/kevinpietersen/4779688/Allan-Stanford-is-a-sleazebag-says-Englands-Kevin-Pietersen.html
King Posted February 22, 2009 Posted February 22, 2009 Wonder why he didn't come up with such claims when all was well. Truth to be told he must have loved Stanford for the kind of money on offer.
Mr. Wicket Posted February 22, 2009 Posted February 22, 2009 Echo ravi's thoughts. Good guy and all that when he was getting Stanford's paycheque... once this comes out KP turns as usual. But then again the man's a mercenary and an a-hole with little dignity.
Fontaine Posted February 22, 2009 Posted February 22, 2009 So hang on a second, Peterson was uncomfortable with the whole thing, and thought the guy was a sleazebag but yet still went on the tour there and played in the T20 matches? I have a lot of respect for how Peterson came back to India to play, but the guy was ho'ing himself out for Stanford if that's how he really feels.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now