Mamu Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 Everytime India started as a favorite they went down with a wimp! -- 87 WC, 96 WC etc. Everytime they were considered rank outsiders -- they went on to win the WC -- 83 WC, 85 B & H, Last T-20 WC etc. So watch for India to not even make it to the Semis
vvvslaxman Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 Everytime India started as a favorite they went down with a wimp! -- 87 WC, 96 WC etc. Everytime they were considered rank outsiders -- they went on to win the WC -- 83 WC, 85 B & H, Last T-20 WC etc. So watch for India to not even make it to the Semis Even in 2003 India was expected to crash out easily after disasterous NZ tour http://content.cricinfo.com/statsguru/content/story/128155.html
Sachinism Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 Everytime India started as a favorite they went down with a wimp! -- 87 WC, 96 WC etc. Everytime they were considered rank outsiders -- they went on to win the WC -- 83 WC, 85 B & H, Last T-20 WC etc. So watch for India to not even make it to the Semis They were one of the teams to watch out for in 2007 WC as well
cowboysfan Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 i dont care what anybody says-india are not the favorites 1)nz 2)wi 3)aus 4)pak are the favorites in order.
Guest Hiten. Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 SRT is right. This Indian team is the most balanced I've seen in some time for limited overs cricket: 1. Batsmen that can play long innings: Dhoni, Gambhir 2. Power hitting: Sehwag, Yuvi, Yusuf 3. Excellent spin options: Bhajji, Ojha, Jadeja, Raina/Rohit/Yusuf 4. Good Seam/Swing: PK, Zaheer, RP 5. Solid fielding with our young guns and that added extra of playing without fear India aren't guaranteed to make the finals but it'll take a very good team playing at it's best to compete/beat us. Or India playing as bad as they did against NZ (in two of the T20's in NZ) :nervous:
vvvslaxman Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 India aren't guaranteed to make the finals but it'll take a very good team playing at it's best to compete/beat us. or India playing at its worst. In a perfect world all Indians would fire perfectly. But it is not a perfect world. Remember how we made a mess of a chase against Dilshan led T20 side of Srilanka. Yusuf and Irfan had to bail them out from an impossible situation.
Mr. Wicket Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 SRT is right. This Indian team is the most balanced I've seen in some time for limited overs cricket: 1. Batsmen that can play long innings: Dhoni, Gambhir 2. Power hitting: Sehwag, Yuvi, Yusuf 3. Excellent spin options: Bhajji, Ojha, Jadeja, Raina/Rohit/Yusuf 4. Good Seam/Swing: PK, Zaheer, RP 5. Solid fielding with our young guns and that added extra of playing without fear India aren't guaranteed to make the finals but it'll take a very good team playing at it's best to compete/beat us. Or a good one that's a lot more rested and fresh. Dhoni and co have been playing pretty much non-stop cricket for a long time now. Aside from the small break in between where we should have played Terroristan, they've been at it non-stop playing Australia, England, Sri Lanka, New Zealand and then the IPL. Ishant didn't bowl in the *** end of the season/IPL with the same fire and energy he had at the start against Australia. Sehwag and Gambhir both looked tired and fatigued towards the end. Not surprisingly, the guys who had long breaks - RP Singh, Raina, Dravid and Kumble - and were not playing tests cricket constantly for differing reasons (RP not picked, Raina only played ODIs, Dravid only played tests, Kumble had his feet up post-retirement) after were the stand out Indian players in the IPL.
King Posted May 28, 2009 Posted May 28, 2009 India is a top contender but in Twenty20s the best contenders may not always win as we have seen in the recent edition of IPL. India was not considered favorite in the last edition of Twenty20 WC but they surprised all and sundry by consistently beating top teams. I wouldn't bet on anyone in the forthcoming Twenty20 considering how it fluctuates. There is no 100% recipe for success. The 4 teams that reach semi finals can all be deemed as favorites. I think India, South Africa, Australia and Sri Lanka may get to the semis. I would think Pakistan is a strong contenders too but they haven't played enough cricket recently to test themselves against different opponents.
Guest gaurav_indian Posted May 29, 2009 Posted May 29, 2009 Is India the favourite to win World T20 title? i dont care what anybody says-india are not the favorites 1)nz 2)wi 3)aus 4)pak are the favorites in order. I can see Vettori and the company lifting the trophy.:nervous:
Xfactor Posted May 29, 2009 Posted May 29, 2009 I would expect India to reach the semis, but will not call India as the favourites. I would consider SA, NZ, and Pak to be the teams to beat. One good thing about the Indian team is that of late they have shown no fear of failure while playing. That could work to their advantage. And most importantly, how the seamers perform.
Zap_Brannigan Posted May 29, 2009 Posted May 29, 2009 20-20 is a lottery. A freak couple of overs can win or lose you the game. Noone is a favorite.
gaurav92 Posted May 29, 2009 Posted May 29, 2009 Andrew Flintoff has tipped India to retain the ICC World Twenty20 Championship next month, saying that the IPL experience will come in handy for Dhoni's men. More... thats why hes not in the team i reckon :hmmmm2:
gaurav92 Posted May 29, 2009 Posted May 29, 2009 saffers are favourites just coz of their brilliant fielding...but yes in T20 there are no favourites
Fontaine Posted May 29, 2009 Posted May 29, 2009 Or a good one that's a lot more rested and fresh. Dhoni and co have been playing pretty much non-stop cricket for a long time now. Aside from the small break in between where we should have played Terroristan, they've been at it non-stop playing Australia, England, Sri Lanka, New Zealand and then the IPL. Ishant didn't bowl in the *** end of the season/IPL with the same fire and energy he had at the start against Australia. Sehwag and Gambhir both looked tired and fatigued towards the end. Not surprisingly, the guys who had long breaks - RP Singh, Raina, Dravid and Kumble - and were not playing tests cricket constantly for differing reasons (RP not picked, Raina only played ODIs, Dravid only played tests, Kumble had his feet up post-retirement) after were the stand out Indian players in the IPL. Dude, have you seen the schedule for the T20 WC? The winner will have to play around 2 matches in a week on average lasting a couple of hours. Most people that age go through more strenous activities in their holidays, especially on honeymoons!!! I'm willing to bet serious ICF money that the likes of Yuvi, Zak etc probably have to go through more work chasing/deflecting fans/women when they are away from cricket than playing a T20 tournament. I've seen Sreesanth/Bhajji dance appearances where they probably put more work in than a 4 over spell in the IPL!!!!
ViruRulez Posted May 29, 2009 Posted May 29, 2009 Players jaded but Dhoni hopeful of defending World T20 title MUMBAI: Indian skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni on Friday admitted that cricketers were tired after a hectic IPL but said he had a balanced team which could defend the title in the World Twenty20 Championships, beginning on June 5 in England. Dhoni also said the just-concluded Indian Premier League extravaganza in South Africa was more beneficial for his side because it provided players with exposure and helped them to learn coping with the pressure of an international event. "I am happy with the balance in our squad. Hopefully, we can defend out title," a jaded-looking Dhoni said at a press conference. "When you play so many matches you do get tired, after all its a human body, but it (IPL) helped us a lot in terms of exposure and skills. So it was more beneficial for us," he said. "It's very important to cope with the pressure in international events specially in the Twenty20 where you do not get time to recover and IPL helped the players handle that well," he added. It is difficult to predict the exact winners in T20 but hope India again retains the title. :two_thumbs_up:
Lord Posted May 29, 2009 Posted May 29, 2009 its not even started n he's looking jaded:nervous: n we don't even have a reserve keeper
cowboysfan Posted May 29, 2009 Posted May 29, 2009 Dude, have you seen the schedule for the T20 WC? The winner will have to play around 2 matches in a week on average lasting a couple of hours. Most people that age go through more strenous activities in their holidays, especially on honeymoons!!! I'm willing to bet serious ICF money that the likes of Yuvi, Zak etc probably have to go through more work chasing/deflecting fans/women when they are away from cricket than playing a T20 tournament. I've seen Sreesanth/Bhajji dance appearances where they probably put more work in than a 4 over spell in the IPL!!!! but the IPL is EVIL i tell you!!.we should take every opportunity to denigrate and villify it.
vvvslaxman Posted May 29, 2009 Posted May 29, 2009 After effects of IPL. Last year he took time off a test series. But this year he cannot because he is the captain. India doesn't have Tests for 6 months though which is poor scheduling. More T20s than Tests.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now