The Outsider Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 Superb performances by Kohli and Rahane - both ones to keep an eye on for the future. Unfortunately none of the reports give any indication of the type of pitches they games were played on - probably they just type up the report without watching the match.
Sachinism Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 I find that hard to believe. Must be a mistake on the part of cricinfo. Its on cricket.com.au as well
Chandan Posted July 24, 2009 Author Posted July 24, 2009 Superb performances by Kohli and Rahane - both ones to keep an eye on for the future. Unfortunately none of the reports give any indication of the type of pitches they games were played on - probably they just type up the report without watching the match. True. Even CA reports are that bad only. When some commentary is going on (they cover AIS games live) you can at least know how they scored or got out. But no information about pitch at all. India had inserted NZ, so pitch or condition must have had something. But you just can't say!
Bradman99 Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 Peter Fulton made 122 off 143 deliviries and didn't strike a single 4 or 6 :omg: Surely not? That's crazy
Cricketics Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 Another century from Virat Kohli. He has been fantastic in List A games. Just before leaving for Australia, he scored massivelly well in Bengal where he played for Mohan Bagan Cricket club.
Guest Hiten. Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 Any news on why Tyagi was left out or did not play this game ? Good show by the emergents.
kooljatt Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 Any news on why Tyagi was left out or did not play this game ? Good show by the emergents. he took 6-37 against SA BTW :icflove:
hari504504 Posted July 25, 2009 Posted July 25, 2009 Is tyagi another medium pacer who revels under swinging/bouncy conditions or does he have enough pace to make an impact on any surface ?
Chandan Posted July 26, 2009 Author Posted July 26, 2009 India slid to their 3rd loss in 4 matches and this way they are out of the final now. Despite scoring 271 in the first inning their bowlers failed to defend the target and SA chased it with just 6 wickets down in the 49th over. Iframe: Open in new window Seems that they dropped out of form Vijay and the steady Amit Mishra for Naman Ojha and B Kumar. But it didn't make much difference as all the bowlers were hammered and batsmen were slow.
Mamu Posted July 26, 2009 Posted July 26, 2009 India slid to their 3rd loss in 4 matches and this way they are out of the final now. Despite scoring 271 in the first inning their bowlers failed to defend the target and SA chased it with just 6 wickets down in the 49th over. Iframe: Open in new window Seems that they dropped out of form Vijay and the steady Amit Mishra for Naman Ojha and B Kumar. But it didn't make much difference as all the bowlers were hammered and batsmen were slow. After this tournament. Badri and Tiwary should be rested for good. Hope nobody ever talks about them again.
jusarrived Posted July 26, 2009 Posted July 26, 2009 I dont like Rahane , think he will be a a bully at domestic level ....but looks a touch short of international class .
Laaloo Posted July 27, 2009 Posted July 27, 2009 I dont like Rahane ' date=' think he will be a a bully at domestic level ....but looks a touch short of international class . Based on what? Do you even watch the Indian Domestic games or are you talking out of ur ass again?
Chandan Posted July 27, 2009 Author Posted July 27, 2009 I dont like Rahane ' date=' think he will be a a bully at domestic level ....but looks a touch short of international class .[/quote'] Based on what? Do you even watch the Indian Domestic games or are you talking out of ur ass again? I was going to ask the same question, though in a civilized manner! Have you seen Rahane play? What shortcomings did you notice in his game? Which batsmen, according to you, are international materia in Indian domestic circuitl? Why? I'm satisfied at Rahane. Though we don't know anything about the pitches of this tourney, but they are not similar to Indian pitches, I'm sure. In that case, Rahane has performed the best among chosen batsmen. Had Pujara and Dhawan been there, we could have seen some good batting performances! Anyway, here is the report from cricinfo, which they compile by just looking at the scorecard, I'm sure! Emerging Players Tournament, Brisbane, 5th day South Africa on song, New Zealand flounder Cricinfo staff July 26, 2009 South Africa Emerging Players 6 for 274 (van Zyl 60, van Jaarsveld 50, Behardien 50, Kumar 3-49) beat India Emerging Players 6 for 271 (Rahane 92, Walters 3-50) by four wickets Scorecard South Africa Emerging Players picked up their fifth win on the trot beating India Emerging Players at the Albury Oval in Brisbane. Ajinkya Rahane's classy 92 for India went in vain as South Africa overhauled a stiff target with nine balls to spare. Stiaan van Zyl, Vaughn van Jaarsveld and Farhaan Behardien contributed vital half-centuries to ensure that South Africa's unbeaten record stayed intact. After being put in, India were off to a solid start as Rahane and Naman Ojha put on a century stand. Captain S Badrinath chipped in with a useful 44, and allrounder Abhishek Nayar gave the innings some late impetus with a quickfire 42 from 27 balls. Medium-pacer Basheeru-Deen Walters picked up three crucial middle-order wickets for 50 runs to emerge as the most successful South African bowler. India were in with a shout after they had reduced South Africa to 2 for 56, but an 82-run third-wicket stand between van Zyl and captain van Jaarsveld turned the match South Africa's way. The fifth-wicket partnership of 54 between van Zyl and Behardien then effectively shut the door on India. Bhuvneshwar Kumar was the pick of Indian bowlers with 3 for 39. South Africa remain at the top of the points table with 10 points, while India are in third place with two victories in five matches. India lost out for a second time against the same opponents, following their 10-run defeat on the second day of the tournament. Australian Institute of Sports 7 for 221 (Cooper 60, Smith 54*, Nethula 3-44) beat New Zealand Emerging Players 217 (Fulton 60, McDermott 3-49) by three wickets Scorecard Despite the presence of internationals such as Tim Southee, Peter Fulton and Martin Guptill, New Zealand Emerging Players slumped to their fifth consecutive defeat in Brisbane. Chasing 218, Australian Institute of Sports were heading for an overwhelming win, as they had when the teams met five days ago, but a middle-order collapse trimmed the margin of victory. After opting to field, AIS didn't allow any New Zealand partnership to flourish; the highest stand of the innings was 37 for the third wicket between captain Peter Fulton and Kane Williamson. Fulton top scored with 60, wicketkeeper Reece Young posted 41 but none of the others crossed 25, which meant New Zealand finished with an insufficient 217. The AIS openers Matthew Wade and Tom Cooper gave the chase a cracking start, putting on 94 in 14 overs. They fell within 12 runs of each other but AIS, guided by Steven Smith, continued to score freely, reaching 3 for 155 in the 28th over. Three wickets went down for seven runs to give New Zealand a sniff but Smith remained unbeaten to shepherd the home side to a win with more than ten overs to spare. --------------------------------------------------------------- No information about the type of pitch, kind of bowling that SA did or how and where or why Indian bowlers faltered, Why did Tyagi bowl just 4 overs, the skills shown by the players from either side, kind of fielding effort etc. But if you are writing the report by looking at the scorecard only, you obviously can't comment on the factors mentioned!
Mr. Wicket Posted July 27, 2009 Posted July 27, 2009 Peter Fulton made 122 off 143 deliviries and didn't strike a single 4 or 6 :omg: Surely not? That's crazy Maybe the next Adam Parore. http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/65999.html (96 off 138 in this game, 0 fours, 0 sixes. BTW that SRT hundred in the second innings was such a joy to watch.)
vvvslaxman Posted July 27, 2009 Posted July 27, 2009 Most impressive among Indians 1) A Nayar (consistent) 2) A Rahane 3) Tyagi 4) Ashwin Kohli is either boom or bust. Rest of them have been mediocre. Badrinath will struggle to find a place even in emerging XI at this rate.
Chandan Posted July 27, 2009 Author Posted July 27, 2009 Most impressive among Indians 1) A Nayar (consistent) 2) A Rahane 3) Tyagi 4) Ashwin Kohli is either boom or bust. Rest of them have been mediocre. Badrinath will struggle to find a place even in emerging XI at this rate. If Kohli is only boom or bust, what is Tyagi? Apart from that 6 fer, he hasn't even completed his quota of overs and bowled only 4 overs in yesterday's match. I'm sure he is injured again, which we'll soon find out when he won't appear in tomorrow's match. And Mishra was the most consistent and economical spin bowler. I suppose without Pujara and Dhawan, this Emerging squad is really incomplete!
Sachinism Posted July 27, 2009 Posted July 27, 2009 Its good they played this tournament, they'll find a lot of flaws in their techniques and hopefully they'll be able to correct those in the next 18 months or so and we can go from there
Mr. Wicket Posted July 27, 2009 Posted July 27, 2009 If Kohli is only boom or bust, what is Tyagi? Apart from that 6 fer, he hasn't even completed his quota of overs and bowled only 4 overs in yesterday's match. I'm sure he is injured again, which we'll soon find out when he won't appear in tomorrow's match. And Mishra was the most consistent and economical spin bowler. I suppose without Pujara and Dhawan, this Emerging squad is really incomplete! Tyagi though seems a lot more complete from what I've noticed in domestic f/c games. Why were Pujara and Dhawan not picked? Injuries?
Chandan Posted July 27, 2009 Author Posted July 27, 2009 Tyagi though seems a lot more complete from what I've noticed in domestic f/c games. Why were Pujara and Dhawan not picked? Injuries? Looks like that. Read somewhere that these guys had to report to NCA so that their recovery could be assessed. So obviously they'd have been injured. I suppose selectors could have chosen Sreesanth as it'd have tested his fitness and he could be available for CT after that, if he'd have proved his fitness. If Mishra could be there as Emerging player, Sree could have been there as well. And I tell you, Dhawal Kulkarni has really really disappointed me. So we don't have a big enough pool of seamers to discard Sree like that.
Mr. Wicket Posted July 27, 2009 Posted July 27, 2009 Sreesanth should never have been discarded. Not after what he showed in Jo'burg. He may be far more inconsistent and have a couple of issues upstairs, but at the end of it the upside when he's confident, on form and firing is unbelievable.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now