Jump to content

Which was your most memorable delivery bowled by a indian bowler?


Sir john

Recommended Posts

Guest BossBhai
Posted

-- Removed on request of the user --

Posted
:hysterical: i love the bitterness. "best ever bowling highlights" ? and who decides what the 'best highlights' are? you? is there a ranking system for it? LMAO what is this list ? there is a list for this kind of **** now ? :haha: what a joke. u pakis win nothing and your cricket has gotten so bad that u are now claiming u are the best at providing 'highlights'....wtf :haha: now seriously - a yorker is a yorker. doesnt matter who bowls it. there is no difference. what is the difference between irfan bowling a perfect inswinging yorker to knock over a quality batsman like gilchrist, and one of your ball tamperers bowling one to some other batsman. its the same delivery. sure, your guys were better at it and did it more often, but the ball is the same. i enjoyed those deliveries just as much as u enjoy maqar bowling his phaaaasht yorkers on youtube. in the same way, a cut shot from saeed anwar isnt exactly lacking in quality just ebcause he has a far lower average than the grand daddy of the cut shot, virender sehwag. maybe u need to take off your green tinted chashma. there really isnt much for u to brag about here.
- I am not at aaalll in any sort of bitterness, rather I am :dance: :winky: and why I will be in bitterness? when since I started to watch cricket I always found Pakistani fast bowler at the top of world... Imran Khan, Wasim Waqar, Shoaib, Razzaq (haha have you forgot sachin declared the most difficult bowler he ever faced is Razzaq)... Even now when our team is producing overall the worst results ever and at lowest ranking ever still our bowling department doing fabolous job... - its not me who deciding which yorkers/bowleds/deliveries were at the top in best ever lists... Com'on and you decide it,result wont be different... haha... you wont be able to find any ball near to "waqar vs lara" alone... - Quite an innocent logic you guys present that why our bowlers could'nt produce then the result when you all know its nothing to talk about bowling, its all about our poor batting. - "a yorker is a yorker. doesnt matter who bowls it. there is no difference" :haha: too funny... say this in front of Irfan Pathan, Zaheer and Nehra and co... who can only dream to bowl anything close to Wasim and waqar chachu... they will tell you the difference better...
Posted
- I am not at aaalll in any sort of bitterness, rather I am :dance: :winky: and why I will be in bitterness? when since I started to watch cricket I always found Pakistani fast bowler at the top of world... Imran Khan, Wasim Waqar, Shoaib, Razzaq (haha have you forgot sachin declared the most difficult bowler he ever faced is Razzaq)... Even now when our team is producing overall the worst results ever and at lowest ranking ever still our bowling department doing fabolous job... - its not me who deciding which yorkers/bowleds/deliveries were at the top in best ever lists... Com'on and you decide it,result wont be different... haha... you wont be able to find any ball near to "waqar vs lara" alone... - Quite an innocent logic you guys present that why our bowlers could'nt produce then the result when you all know its nothing to talk about bowling, its all about our poor batting. - "a yorker is a yorker. doesnt matter who bowls it. there is no difference" :haha: too funny... say this in front of Irfan Pathan, Zaheer and Nehra and co... who can only dream to bowl anything close to Wasim and waqar chachu... they will tell you the difference better...
LOL, sachin also said the same thing about hansie cronje. but if u want to give razzaq the nishaan-e-haider for that, then go ahead...must be the greatest achievement in paki history :giggle: and the idea of abdul mazzaq being a top bowler is just :lol: the restof your post is just pure ghosht-fuelled bakwaas. the fact remains, a yorker is a yorker. what separates great bwoelrs from good ones is the abillity to bowl it at will. and paki bowlers had that ability, no one denies it. and again, u keep mentioning some mysterious 'list'. zara yeh list humare saath share karo, i have never seen it. u talk like only the pakis know how to bowl yaaarkers, i can assure u that isnt the case...:winky: seriously, i find it hilarious how u are talking crap about some really nice deliveries just because they were bowled by indians. typical paki, i can see the bitterness leaking out of your ears. and stop blaming your batting for everything. your phaaaaasht yorker shooting YOUTUBE SUPERSTAR bowlers maqar and wazeem coudnt even defend a massive 370 run target against australia on a 5th day pitch at hobart in 1999, LOL. cant blame inzamamullah for this one. its funny how all the yaaaarkers go missing when the pressure is on.
Posted
LOL, sachin also said the same thing about hansie cronje. but if u want to give razzaq the nishaan-e-haider for that, then go ahead...must be the greatest achievement in paki history :giggle: and the idea of abdul mazzaq being a top bowler is just :lol: the restof your post is just pure ghosht-fuelled bakwaas. the fact remains, a yorker is a yorker. what separates great bwoelrs from good ones is the abillity to bowl it at will. and paki bowlers had that ability, no one denies it. and again, u keep mentioning some mysterious 'list'. zara yeh list humare saath share karo, i have never seen it. u talk like only the pakis know how to bowl yaaarkers, i can assure u that isnt the case...:winky: seriously, i find it hilarious how u are talking crap about some really nice deliveries just because they were bowled by indians. typical paki, i can see the bitterness leaking out of your ears. and stop blaming your batting for everything. your phaaaaasht yorker shooting YOUTUBE SUPERSTAR bowlers maqar and wazeem coudnt even defend a massive 370 run target against australia on a 5th day pitch at hobart in 1999, LOL. cant blame inzamamullah for this one. its funny how all the yaaaarkers go missing when the pressure is on.
(Bro! first of all you can convery your message quite easily without having ill manners and loose talk...) I never said Razzaq is any sort of top level bowler, just told u a small fact... "a yorker is a yorker. what separates great bwoelrs from good ones is the... " you negated urself here... first u said every yorker is always same, "there is no difference"... and now how u urself figured out a difference, thats the difference I was talking about... it is not any particular list I am talking, yar aik simple si bat nahi samjh aa rahi? pashto samjhtey ho ya farsi? I am saying just just try to rate yourself man yourself! its neither a defined list nor I am talking a rocket science... and finally, I said in my first post today that "wasim, waqar, shoaib" might have failed many times... talk on the whole, dont get at abc vs jkl at xyz on 30 feb 19xx... exceptions are always there... its just a general statment that: "mostly its Pakistan's batting which let them down", and u start crying and give a statement "no no no it is Pakistans bolwing which failed on 1854 vs france at peshawar on 4:62 AM..." crap...
Posted

no, i said the exact same thing. thoda padhna likhna seekho. so your point s that u produced bowlers with an ability to bowl yorkers more often...wow...congratulations. here, have a medal...i made it myself especially for u dre2c1.jpg dil dil pakistan zindabadd!!!! :yay:

Posted
no, i said the exact same thing. thoda padhna likhna seekho. so your point s that u produced bowlers with an ability to bowl yorkers more often...wow...congratulations. here, have a medal...i made it myself especially for u dre2c1.jpg dil dil pakistan zindabadd!!!! :yay:
Thats better, Good effort :two_thumbs_up:
Posted
(Bro! first of all you can convery your message quite easily without having ill manners and loose talk...) I never said Razzaq is any sort of top level bowler, just told u a small fact... "a yorker is a yorker. what separates great bwoelrs from good ones is the... " you negated urself here... first u said every yorker is always same, "there is no difference"... and now how u urself figured out a difference, thats the difference I was talking about... it is not any particular list I am talking, yar aik simple si bat nahi samjh aa rahi? pashto samjhtey ho ya farsi? I am saying just just try to rate yourself man yourself! its neither a defined list nor I am talking a rocket science... and finally, I said in my first post today that "wasim, waqar, shoaib" might have failed many times... talk on the whole, dont get at abc vs jkl at xyz on 30 feb 19xx... exceptions are always there... its just a general statment that: "mostly its Pakistan's batting which let them down", and u start crying and give a statement "no no no it is Pakistans bolwing which failed on 1854 vs france at peshawar on 4:62 AM..." crap...
Whats the point of Having Phaast bowlers when u dont win matches these days pak loses more games than winning it i mean the last test series was won in 2006 last odi series was in 2008 that speaks a lot about u r team even our indian medium pacers who arent hyped can still win matches for india .
Posted
obviously they provide the best highlights... When a team gets a score of 88' date='72 and 80 they do provide some of the best highlights....[/quote'] Funniest thing was our padosis said Umar Amin was another Ganguly & Azhar Ali was another Rahul Dravid let me remind u Dravid& Ganguly scored more than 50 runs in first innings against Eng in Eng.
Posted
obviously they provide the best highlights... When a team gets a score of 88' date='72 and 80 they do provide some of the best highlights....[/quote'] :hysterical:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...