Another Mo'Mhed - Irfan = Zoysa = Giraffe

[Rajiv]

Zaheer vs Zoysa? Can someone tell me what the faaaaack is going on here?

Amateur jokers given a computer and internet connection

[ravishingravi]

Seems like another great buy by KKR.

[ensd2]

B->B->B->B->

Seems like another great buy by KKR.

:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: if he can't bowls in england condition he will be hopeless in sub continental pitch , KKR should invest their money on quality spinner like SWANN , but W Akram is PAK

[DomainK]

Seems like another great buy by KKR.

Wait till he is coached by Sir Aggy.

[vvvslaxman]

B->B->B->B->:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: if he can't bowls in england condition he will be hopeless in sub continental pitch , KKR should invest their money on quality spinner like SWANN , but W Akram is PAK

Yusuf Pathan will ...... him :hysterical:

[thongale]

Really? I did say earlier that I do not care too much about what the stats say but this comment of yours made me go through the stats. In great detail. I checked stats of both Zaheer and Zoysa against Australia. In Tests and in ODIs. And also specifically against Gilchrist.

Ha Ha! now you said you don't care about stats when I showed that Zoysa and Zaheer has similar career stats. Now when you want to prove a point of you make use of stats. This is classical double standards.

Every single stat points to Zaheer doing better against Australia than Zoysa.

Like this?:haha: vs AUS overall Zoysa - Avg 45.25, ER 4.50, SR 60.2 Zaheer - Avg 48.28, ER 5.98, SR 48.6 Both have not played much in Australia to compare. So please, stick to your own advice. If you don't want to discuss stats, be my guest and stick to your subjective opinions. I wouldn't give a rat's ass and won't be discussing with you after that. If you want to discuss with stats, learn the correct stats

So please check for yourself whether Aussies rate Zoysa rather than a "certain" Zaheer.

My, my, how can you talk on behalf of Aussies? Afterall you never rate stats?:giggle:

It is even ridiculous that we are comparing Zaheer with somebody like Zoysa. I can understand comparing Zaheer with Vaas.

They are almost similar in tests. In ODIs Vaas by a distance.

Comparing Zaheer with Zoysa is like comparing Tendulkar with Kandamby.

This is the best analogy I ever heard! And remeber that Zoysa played a better Australian team than that Zaheer played.

[thongale]

And when minnows are excluded, Zoysa 93 @ 31.25, ER - 4.76, SR - 39.2 Zaheer 184 @ 33.66, ER - 5.09, SR - 39.6 How about that for hard "statistical" evidence to show Zoysa is similar to Zaheer in everya aspect of ODI bowling? Oh wait, you don't rate stats.

[Andy]

Ha Ha! now you said you don't care about stats when I showed that Zoysa and Zaheer has similar career stats. Now when you want to prove a point of you make use of stats. This is classical double standards. Like this?:haha: vs AUS overall Zoysa - Avg 45.25, ER 4.50, SR 60.2 Zaheer - Avg 48.28, ER 5.98, SR 48.6 Both have not played much in Australia to compare. So please, stick to your own advice. If you don't want to discuss stats, be my guest and stick to your subjective opinions. I wouldn't give a rat's ass and won't be discussing with you after that. If you want to discuss with stats, learn the correct stats My, my, how can you talk on behalf of Aussies? Afterall you never rate stats?:giggle: They are almost similar in tests. In ODIs Vaas by a distance. This is the best analogy I ever heard! And remeber that Zoysa played a better Australian team than that Zaheer played.

Comparring Zoysa with Zaheer is joke overall as a bowler.I have already said, Zak is an Ordinary ODI bowler. But Test is the Purest form of the game and the basis of judging a quality bowler. In that Format Zak is way ahead of Zoysa. If you show ODI stats , i can show you too which will make you Believe Ajit Agarkar as Good as Akram.:winky:

[King]

Amateur jokers given a computer and internet connection

:hysterical:

[thongale]

Comparring Zoysa with Zaheer is joke overall as a bowler.I have already said, Zak is an Ordinary ODI bowler. But Test is the Purest form of the game and the basis of judging a quality bowler. In that Format Zak is way ahead of Zoysa. If you show ODI stats , i can show you too which will make you Believe Ajit Agarkar as Good as Akram.:winky:

There's no comparison in tests that Zaheer is ahead, and their difference in class was due to difference in fitness levels. (Fit and firing Zoysa was lethal than Vaas, but most of the time he was injured and could not bowl long spells). But we were discussing about ODIs. Agarkar may have been good but that was a heck of a peak for him. Wasim's stats in his peak wil easily dwarf Agarkar's. I think we have agreed here even after having different view points.

[Andy]

There's no comparison in tests that Zaheer is ahead' date=' and their difference in class was due to difference in fitness levels. (Fit and firing Zoysa was lethal than Vaas, but most of the time he was injured and could not bowl long spells). But we were discussing about ODIs. Agarkar may have been good but that was a heck of a peak for him. Wasim's stats in his peak wil easily dwarf Agarkar's. I think we have agreed here even after having different view points.[/quote'] Well Zaheer to remained Injured for many Years. Lets not talk about Ifs and Buts. I dont think Zak is a quality ODI bowler as most of the games this days are played on Flat patas. To suceed on those wickets you need sccuracy, which our bowlers lack. But ZAK is one of the best Test bowlers around currently.

[rkt.india]

he does not use his right hand well in his action while bowling..thats a technical fault