Jump to content

Umesh yadav-pretty impressive.


Recommended Posts

Posted
I expect lanka to be 50 for 3 after 10 overs as I definitely expect Zak and Umesh to rip 3 wickets in first 10 overs....... If lanks is 40 for no loss after 10 overs or even 40 for 1 Lanks wud have done a great job. Against zak and Umesh
yeah, but then when he comes back in the 40th, he is gonna bowl his 150 kmph leg stump line 'hit me baby' half volleys to kulasekara and perera, so lanka will eventually finish with a score of 280/9 after a 100 run 9th wicket partnership
Posted
yeah' date=' but then when he comes back in the 40th, he is gonna bowl his 150 kmph leg stump line 'hit me baby' half volleys to kulasekara and perera, so lanka will eventually finish with a score of 280/9 after a 100 run 9th wicket partnership[/quote'] LOL true, India's depth bowling is nowhere near the standards. Needs real improvement.
Posted
yeah' date=' but then when he comes back in the 40th, he is gonna bowl his 150 kmph leg stump line 'hit me baby' half volleys to kulasekara and perera, so lanka will eventually finish with a score of 280/9 after a 100 run 9th wicket partnership[/quote'] i think he does not want to comprmise speed so he compromises on ability to york.. interesting to know how many bowlers were able to bowl 145+ yorkers... Akthar Jason Gillespie ? waqar was slower.
Guest BossBhai
Posted

-- Removed on request of the user --

Posted
ehhh ?
i really wanna know how many fast bowlers bowled seering yorkers at 145+ Akthar surely did, i remember seeing Lara get bowled by him. Waqar did too but he was slower than 145.
Posted
i really wanna know how many fast bowlers bowled seering yorkers at 145+ Akthar surely did, i remember seeing Lara get bowled by him. Waqar did too but he was slower than 145.
Bowling yorker is practice and it does not come naturally because it needs extra effort to bowl a yorker. Until they practice in the nets methodically, they wont bowl it consistently accurate. Every format of cricket requires different variations and yorker is must for T20 and ODIs. A fast bowler can be predictable in tests, it will work for him to bowl one line and length, but one has to vary in shorter formats and yorker plays an important role in that.
Posted
waqar was much quicker than akram a good 8-10ks. probably the first 100mph bowler
Classic paki BS and rubbish. 1st 100mph bowler.:giggle: O yes cos Marshall, Holding, Garner, Slyvester Clarke and co were slower:hysterical:
Posted
Classic paki BS and rubbish. 1st 100mph bowler.:giggle: O yes cos Marshall, Holding, Garner, Slyvester Clarke and co were slower:hysterical:
lol he is just trolling :cantstop:
Posted
Classic paki BS and rubbish. 1st 100mph bowler.:giggle: O yes cos Marshall, Holding, Garner, Slyvester Clarke and co were slower:hysterical:
they were quick but waqar was quicker.
Posted
were u even born back then ?:nervous:
if he born then how can he know...he born before Waqar born :dontknow:
Posted
Classic paki BS and rubbish. 1st 100mph bowler.:giggle: O yes cos Marshall, Holding, Garner, Slyvester Clarke and co were slower:hysterical:
Only Holding and Marshall out of these 4 were quick. Clarke and Garner were fast mediums, not express. I guess Bishop, Patterson, and Holding were the quickest WI bowlers. But fist 1`00 mph bowler was Jeff Thomson, not Waqar. Waqar was no where close to Thomson. Regarding Akram, he was never express, say around 140-145 and Would say Waqar could bowl around 145-150ish.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...