rkt.india Posted July 8, 2012 Posted July 8, 2012 My job is to bowl fast: Umesh Yadav Chest fool ke breast ho gayi.:winky:
Manny_Pacquiao Posted July 8, 2012 Posted July 8, 2012 I expect lanka to be 50 for 3 after 10 overs as I definitely expect Zak and Umesh to rip 3 wickets in first 10 overs....... If lanks is 40 for no loss after 10 overs or even 40 for 1 Lanks wud have done a great job. Against zak and Umesh yeah, but then when he comes back in the 40th, he is gonna bowl his 150 kmph leg stump line 'hit me baby' half volleys to kulasekara and perera, so lanka will eventually finish with a score of 280/9 after a 100 run 9th wicket partnership
carnish Posted July 8, 2012 Posted July 8, 2012 yeah' date=' but then when he comes back in the 40th, he is gonna bowl his 150 kmph leg stump line 'hit me baby' half volleys to kulasekara and perera, so lanka will eventually finish with a score of 280/9 after a 100 run 9th wicket partnership[/quote'] LOL true, India's depth bowling is nowhere near the standards. Needs real improvement.
adi B Posted July 8, 2012 Posted July 8, 2012 Chest fool ke breast ho gayi.:winky: :cantstop: very relieved
vayuu1 Posted July 8, 2012 Posted July 8, 2012 :cantstop: very relieved My chest has become blouse with happiness.
Vilander Posted July 8, 2012 Posted July 8, 2012 LOL true' date=' India's depth bowling is nowhere near the standards. Needs real improvement.[/quote'] you ment death ?
Vilander Posted July 8, 2012 Posted July 8, 2012 yeah' date=' but then when he comes back in the 40th, he is gonna bowl his 150 kmph leg stump line 'hit me baby' half volleys to kulasekara and perera, so lanka will eventually finish with a score of 280/9 after a 100 run 9th wicket partnership[/quote'] i think he does not want to comprmise speed so he compromises on ability to york.. interesting to know how many bowlers were able to bowl 145+ yorkers... Akthar Jason Gillespie ? waqar was slower.
Vilander Posted July 8, 2012 Posted July 8, 2012 ehhh ? i really wanna know how many fast bowlers bowled seering yorkers at 145+ Akthar surely did, i remember seeing Lara get bowled by him. Waqar did too but he was slower than 145.
rkt.india Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 i really wanna know how many fast bowlers bowled seering yorkers at 145+ Akthar surely did, i remember seeing Lara get bowled by him. Waqar did too but he was slower than 145. Bowling yorker is practice and it does not come naturally because it needs extra effort to bowl a yorker. Until they practice in the nets methodically, they wont bowl it consistently accurate. Every format of cricket requires different variations and yorker is must for T20 and ODIs. A fast bowler can be predictable in tests, it will work for him to bowl one line and length, but one has to vary in shorter formats and yorker plays an important role in that.
panther Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 waqar was much quicker than akram a good 8-10ks. probably the first 100mph bowler
JaFanatic Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 waqar was much quicker than akram a good 8-10ks. probably the first 100mph bowler :hysterical::hysterical:
King Tendulkar Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 waqar was much quicker than akram a good 8-10ks. probably the first 100mph bowler Classic paki BS and rubbish. 1st 100mph bowler.:giggle: O yes cos Marshall, Holding, Garner, Slyvester Clarke and co were slower:hysterical:
Old guy Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 Classic paki BS and rubbish. 1st 100mph bowler.:giggle: O yes cos Marshall, Holding, Garner, Slyvester Clarke and co were slower:hysterical: lol he is just trolling :cantstop:
panther Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 1989-1994 waqar was considerably quicker than akram, the west Indian bowlers donald etc.
panther Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 Classic paki BS and rubbish. 1st 100mph bowler.:giggle: O yes cos Marshall, Holding, Garner, Slyvester Clarke and co were slower:hysterical: they were quick but waqar was quicker.
Old guy Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 they were quick but waqar was quicker. were u even born back then ?:nervous:
Guest Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 were u even born back then ?:nervous: if he born then how can he know...he born before Waqar born :dontknow:
rkt.india Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 Classic paki BS and rubbish. 1st 100mph bowler.:giggle: O yes cos Marshall, Holding, Garner, Slyvester Clarke and co were slower:hysterical: Only Holding and Marshall out of these 4 were quick. Clarke and Garner were fast mediums, not express. I guess Bishop, Patterson, and Holding were the quickest WI bowlers. But fist 1`00 mph bowler was Jeff Thomson, not Waqar. Waqar was no where close to Thomson. Regarding Akram, he was never express, say around 140-145 and Would say Waqar could bowl around 145-150ish.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now