JaFanatic Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 they were quick but waqar was quicker.:hysterical::hysterical:oh...ma god...guy pls stp trolling cnt stp laughin at ur posts:hysterical:
panther Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 Only Holding and Marshall out of these 4 were quick. Clarke and Garner were fast mediums' date=' not express. I guess Bishop, Patterson, and Holding were the quickest WI bowlers. But fist 1`00 mph bowler was Jeff Thomson, not Waqar. Waqar was no where close to Thomson. Regarding Akram, he was never express, say around 140-145 and Would say Waqar could bowl around 145-150ish.[/quote'] his effort ball was 155+ and before his back injury he was in his own league in terms of pace i would say 145+ and some spells 150+.
panther Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 if javagal srinath can bowl at 156k than waqar can bowl 160+.
Guest Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 if javagal srinath can bowl at 156k than waqar can bowl 160+.[/QUOTE] why stop there..write 170/175 +
JaFanatic Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 hey be serious yesterday waqar himself called panther and said that he bowled 160+:hysterical:
King Tendulkar Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 Only Holding and Marshall out of these 4 were quick. Clarke and Garner were fast mediums' date=' not express. I guess Bishop, Patterson, and Holding were the quickest WI bowlers. But fist 1`00 mph bowler was Jeff Thomson, not Waqar. Waqar was no where close to Thomson. Regarding Akram, he was never express, say around 140-145 and Would say Waqar could bowl around 145-150ish.[/quote'] Sylvester clarke was lightining, may not haver been the best but was as express as it gets.
Vilander Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 waqar was much quicker than akram a good 8-10ks. probably the first 100mph bowler :cantstop: :finger:
Vilander Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 if javagal srinath can bowl at 156k than waqar can bowl 160+. only Srinath was measured, and is on books. He was faster than Alan Donald in that series, Alan was regarded the fastest bowler in the world around that time. So if pigs can fly then waqar can bowl 140+ yes.
carnish Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 you ment death ? Potato Potahto ... you got it na, chill maroo.
rkt.india Posted July 10, 2012 Posted July 10, 2012 Sylvester clarke was lightining' date=' may not haver been the best but was as express as it gets.[/quote'] Did you watch him live? There is a video of him posted by Roblinda. He is no where near express. In fact, his bowling action was so crap, he cannot bowl express with that. There is so much hyperbole regarding old year fast bowlers but videos prove otherwise. As I said, Holding, Marshal were pretty quick, but Clark was not as quick as them. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA1L_cDJEEI]SYLVESTER CLARKE - Forgotten West Indies fast bowler..... - YouTube[/ame]
bajrang Posted July 10, 2012 Posted July 10, 2012 ^^^^lol at 1:49 even the commentator says this about clarke " not quite the pace of other west indian fast bowlers". bahahahhaha .
MCcricket Posted July 10, 2012 Posted July 10, 2012 Did you watch him live? There is a video of him posted by Roblinda. He is no where near express. In fact, his bowling action was so crap, he cannot bowl express with that. There is so much hyperbole regarding old year fast bowlers but videos prove otherwise. As I said, Holding, Marshal were pretty quick, but Clark was not as quick as them. Clarke was not as fast as Marshall or Holding but the reason he was feared was because of his action some balls were a lot faster then normal and also his short ball was lethal it was also mentioned then his faster bouncer was bowled with a slightly doubtful action.
Vilander Posted July 10, 2012 Posted July 10, 2012 Potato Potahto ... you got it na' date=' chill maroo.[/quote'] dont get angry maan...:cantstop:
PaceAttack Posted July 21, 2012 Posted July 21, 2012 Lets bump this thread. All hail ICFers for supporting the kooooomars.
Manny_Pacquiao Posted July 21, 2012 Posted July 21, 2012 he is the worst bowler i have ever seen playing ODIs for india. getting smacked around by a number 10...this is about as low as it gets. absolutely abysmal. aur chooste raho is bandhe ka ****. imagine this behen ka **** getting the ball in a close game...he will blow it in 1 over.
Vilander Posted July 21, 2012 Posted July 21, 2012 He needs to open the innings , needs to get he hard new ball.:cantstop:
Old guy Posted July 21, 2012 Posted July 21, 2012 don wanna make excuses but he did well when it mattered and one catch was dropped of his bowling and rhytm wasnt gr8 when he got it right he made the difference by getting people out (which we normally are unable to do after ball loses its shine) give him full run in this series ims sure he will improve with each match long season ahead
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now