Jump to content

Umesh yadav-pretty impressive.


Recommended Posts

Posted
Only Holding and Marshall out of these 4 were quick. Clarke and Garner were fast mediums' date=' not express. I guess Bishop, Patterson, and Holding were the quickest WI bowlers. But fist 1`00 mph bowler was Jeff Thomson, not Waqar. Waqar was no where close to Thomson. Regarding Akram, he was never express, say around 140-145 and Would say Waqar could bowl around 145-150ish.[/quote'] his effort ball was 155+ and before his back injury he was in his own league in terms of pace i would say 145+ and some spells 150+.
Posted
if javagal srinath can bowl at 156k than waqar can bowl 160+.[/QUOTE] why stop there..write 170/175 +
Posted
just imagine ..nothing wrong in that
Posted
Only Holding and Marshall out of these 4 were quick. Clarke and Garner were fast mediums' date=' not express. I guess Bishop, Patterson, and Holding were the quickest WI bowlers. But fist 1`00 mph bowler was Jeff Thomson, not Waqar. Waqar was no where close to Thomson. Regarding Akram, he was never express, say around 140-145 and Would say Waqar could bowl around 145-150ish.[/quote'] Sylvester clarke was lightining, may not haver been the best but was as express as it gets.
Posted
if javagal srinath can bowl at 156k than waqar can bowl 160+.
only Srinath was measured, and is on books. He was faster than Alan Donald in that series, Alan was regarded the fastest bowler in the world around that time. So if pigs can fly then waqar can bowl 140+ yes.
Posted
Sylvester clarke was lightining' date=' may not haver been the best but was as express as it gets.[/quote'] Did you watch him live? There is a video of him posted by Roblinda. He is no where near express. In fact, his bowling action was so crap, he cannot bowl express with that. There is so much hyperbole regarding old year fast bowlers but videos prove otherwise. As I said, Holding, Marshal were pretty quick, but Clark was not as quick as them. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA1L_cDJEEI]SYLVESTER CLARKE - Forgotten West Indies fast bowler..... - YouTube[/ame]
Posted
Did you watch him live? There is a video of him posted by Roblinda. He is no where near express. In fact, his bowling action was so crap, he cannot bowl express with that. There is so much hyperbole regarding old year fast bowlers but videos prove otherwise. As I said, Holding, Marshal were pretty quick, but Clark was not as quick as them.
Clarke was not as fast as Marshall or Holding but the reason he was feared was because of his action some balls were a lot faster then normal and also his short ball was lethal it was also mentioned then his faster bouncer was bowled with a slightly doubtful action.
Posted

he is the worst bowler i have ever seen playing ODIs for india. getting smacked around by a number 10...this is about as low as it gets. absolutely abysmal. aur chooste raho is bandhe ka ****. imagine this behen ka **** getting the ball in a close game...he will blow it in 1 over.

Posted

don wanna make excuses but he did well when it mattered and one catch was dropped of his bowling and rhytm wasnt gr8 when he got it right he made the difference by getting people out (which we normally are unable to do after ball loses its shine) give him full run in this series ims sure he will improve with each match long season ahead :dance:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...