punjabi_khota Posted November 30, 2012 Posted November 30, 2012 Lillee called him a once in a generation bowler because that is how rare a good spell from him is :hysterical::hysterical:
saket123 Posted November 30, 2012 Posted November 30, 2012 Mitchell Johnson always reminded me of Arjun Rampal.
Tendulkar_Bhai Posted November 30, 2012 Posted November 30, 2012 Just watched highlights AUS v SA and he bowled 3/4 bad delivers per over, hes worse than Vinay Kumar.
punjabi_khota Posted December 1, 2012 Posted December 1, 2012 MJ is a 10x fitter version of Sreesanth, but both are pretty unreliable. Sreesanth would bowl a few good ones between utter tripe at fast pace during first couple of spells, and then get tired and bowl shyte medium pace all over the pitch for rest of match (or even series). MJ on the other hand would keep bowling crap with pace all throughout the match, and slip in some snorters.
CG Posted December 1, 2012 Posted December 1, 2012 MJ is a 10x fitter version of Sreesanth, but both are pretty unreliable. Sreesanth would bowl a few good ones between utter tripe at fast pace during first couple of spells, and then get tired and bowl shyte medium pace all over the pitch for rest of match (or even series). MJ on the other hand would keep bowling crap with pace all throughout the match, and slip in some snorters. If johnson had sreesanth seam position he would have a great bowler.Johnson problem has been his seam position .
Crookbond Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 If johnson had sreesanth seam position he would have a great bowler.Johnson problem has been his seam position . Technically - his wrist position which is angled and not behind the line of the ball leading to a scrambled seam and not allowing the ball to swing back in to the RHB.
BeautifulGame Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 I remember Johnson started swinging the ball back into the right handers in the 2008 series against SA in which he was terrific.Dont know how he lost it again.
maniac Posted December 2, 2012 Posted December 2, 2012 If johnson had sreesanth seam position he would have a great bowler.Johnson problem has been his seam position . I would say Johnson and ishanth would be a better comparison,given how many chances they got based on their perceived talent.
Chaos Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 guy was amazing when in form. Awesome swing bowler at speed
Crookbond Posted December 3, 2012 Posted December 3, 2012 I remember Johnson started swinging the ball back into the right handers in the 2008 series against SA in which he was terrific.Dont know how he lost it again. Wrist not behind the ball - nothing else.
Crookbond Posted March 23, 2013 Posted March 23, 2013 Looks like a warrior from a Hollywood war movie!
I6MTW Posted March 23, 2013 Posted March 23, 2013 He has not shaved because he wants to look intimidating.
nevada Posted March 23, 2013 Posted March 23, 2013 Just needs to put on a coat with holes to complete that starving homeless man look.
suraj Posted March 23, 2013 Posted March 23, 2013 he is not shyt but also not great not everyone has to be perfect - if every team could find perfection at every spot there would not be need for backups
Lord Posted March 23, 2013 Posted March 23, 2013 He has not shaved because he wants to look intimidating. Ishant doesnt cut his hair for that.only if they worked that hard on thier bowling :giggle:
I6MTW Posted March 23, 2013 Posted March 23, 2013 Ishant doesnt cut his hair for that.only if they worked that hard on thier bowling :giggle: Ishant is back in business. He has searched and found his form. But he should cut his hair. Because of that he does not know where to bowl. The hair is blocking his view. Poor Guy.:((
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now