Old guy Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 sorry to bust .. there is no specific sales figures for sony is avalable for UK.. and google doesnt release its nexus series sales figures .. but i check the Q1 results of sony .. they shipped 8.8 millon phones .. for comparison samsung sold close to 80 million.. apple sold 51 million.. considering japan is the primary mkt for sony , even conservative estimates wont give 2% of the market share to sony.. so we ant conclude that sony is huge and google is noname when comes to smartphones in UK .. So u deliberately did not search? I found result in 20 seconds http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/2337234/apple-overtakes-samsung-in-smartphone-sales-as-nokia-windows-phones-rise
velu Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 So u deliberately did not search? I found result in 20 seconds http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/2337234/apple-overtakes-samsung-in-smartphone-sales-as-nokia-windows-phones-rise sorry .. copy paste error Title is : apple-overtakes-samsung-in-smartphone-sales-as-nokia-windows-phones-rise would be glad if i am proven wrong that sony outsells nexus seris .. so its 5.5% for sony .. and it proves they are massive
Old guy Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 sorry .. copy paste error Title is : apple-overtakes-samsung-in-smartphone-sales-as-nokia-windows-phones-rise would be glad if i am proven wrong that sony outsells nexus seris .. Check data I do to have to spoon feed you Sony gets almost 10 percent market share Do the maths and tell me why nexus is not even mentioned there ? Nexus is just one phone which is sold only online on no carier and with no advertising vs the company who is number 3 in Europe and uk
Old guy Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 sorry .. copy paste error Title is : apple-overtakes-samsung-in-smartphone-sales-as-nokia-windows-phones-rise would be glad if i am proven wrong that sony outsells nexus seris .. so its 5.5% for sony .. and it proves they are massive It's 9 percent For single company it's massive For every three iphone there is one sony phone which is huge Maybe I expect too much from u that u would under stand and when I have to spoon feed u data I feel u are trolling ..are u saying there is nexus sold for every 2 iphone ?
velu Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 It's 9 percent For single company it's massive For every three iphone there is one sony phone which is huge Maybe I expect too much from u that u would under stand and when I have to spoon feed u data I feel u are trolling ..are u saying there is nexus sold for every 2 iphone ? damn it .. :mad: i agree now that iPhone share is 30% and sony share is close to 10%.. but it doesnt change the fact that apple and smasung users generate more traffic :--D enterprise users are either BB or apple users ..so they do consume more traffic .. thats the reason BB has betetr traffic
Old guy Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 damn it .. :mad: i agree now that iPhone share is 30% and sony share is close to 10%.. but it doesnt change the fact that apple and smasung users generate more traffic :--D enterprise users are either BB or apple users ..so they do consume more traffic .. thats the reason BB has betetr traffic Still how does nexus with probably under 1 percent share is so low and windows with also around 10 percent so low ? I am not blaming u bud but this is exactly these results are not trusted ... Also blackberry fell down to 3 percent or even less I am ignorant about enterprise solutions,...do they use web? I thought they have their own network...sorry but can u explain me this ?
velu Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 Still how does nexus with probably under 1 percent share is so low and windows with also around 10 percent so low ? I am not blaming u bud but this is exactly these results are not trusted ... Also blackberry fell down to 3 percent or even less I am ignorant about enterprise solutions,...do they use web? I thought they have their own network...sorry but can u explain me this ? to tell you the truth .. i am bit drunk :giggle: enterprise solutions uses the same network .. but they are more secure .. by default all the data will be encrypted ( decrytption keys will change regularly but i done know how it works ).. and they use secure SSL for communicating and do lots of nonses like RSA , IPSec( dont know what it mean :P).. they consume a lot of data because when we do work most of the jobs consume a lot of data .. for example ARM code will build in ARM server in onsite location, so for the duration of the whole time data traffic will be ther.. for work from home options most companies gives VLAN .. i know one enterprise solution .. Junos by juniper networks, and samsung is dveleping a simialr thing :D
Old guy Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 to tell you the truth .. i am bit drunk :giggle: enterprise solutions uses the same network .. but they are more secure .. by default all the data will be encrypted ( decrytption keys will change regularly but i done know how it works ).. and they use secure SSL for communicating and do lots of nonses like RSA , IPSec( dont know what it mean :P).. they consume a lot of data because when we do work most of the jobs consume a lot of data .. for example ARM code will build in ARM server in onsite location, so for the duration of the whole time data traffic will be ther.. for work from home options most companies gives VLAN .. i know one enterprise solution .. Junos by juniper networks, and samsung is dveleping a simialr thing :D I see Let me put very inaccurate and simple comparison Most of their data is access of files like in server ? Is that counted while check web traffic ? We can talk about this tomorrow ..go sleep but this is type of topic I want to discuss not stupid trolling we see in every 2nd tech site for which I have disabled comments :giggle: That's why u do t see me on gam arena forum or any forum for that matter :giggle:
velu Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 I see Let me put very inaccurate and simple comparison Most of their data is access of files like in server ? Is that counted while check web traffic ? We can talk about this tomorrow ..go sleep but this is type of topic I want to discuss not stupid trolling we see in every 2nd tech site for which I have disabled comments :giggle: That's why u do t see me on gam arena forum or any forum for that matter :giggle: it all depends on the domain .. but majority of the data traffic gets consumed for checking mails and official chats .. if we consume the data thru n/w providers , it will be definitely counted as web traffic .. in Junos file size download limit is 5GB and thats huge .. so chances r there some will download files too.. wont be logging in for next 3 or 4 days .. going to hometown .. so cant troll MTC n you in office all cricket sites are blocked .. i keep browsing gsmarena , patentlyappple , appleinsder , anddroidcentral .. i do troll both samsung/amdroid as well as apple guys .. apple fans use to fight aggressively that 3.5 inch screens are the best i go by the name Django , D silent :D i honestly believe bloggers are paid .. posters are paid .. youtube channels got paid .. and i am not blaming one company.. if you are interested in blogging / videos , you can make decent money
Old guy Posted July 4, 2014 Posted July 4, 2014 it all depends on the domain .. but majority of the data traffic gets consumed for checking mails and official chats .. if we consume the data thru n/w providers , it will be definitely counted as web traffic .. in Junos file size download limit is 5GB and thats huge .. so chances r there some will download files too.. wont be logging in for next 3 or 4 days .. going to hometown .. so cant troll MTC n you in office all cricket sites are blocked .. i keep browsing gsmarena , patentlyappple , appleinsder , anddroidcentral .. i do troll both samsung/amdroid as well as apple guys .. apple fans use to fight aggressively that 3.5 inch screens are the best i go by the name Django , D silent :D i honestly believe bloggers are paid .. posters are paid .. youtube channels got paid .. and i am not blaming one company.. if you are interested in blogging / videos , you can make decent money i have no doubt they are samsung got caught last year :giggle: man just do not troll about this stuff..its kind of disappointed as you are one person i want to learn about this stuff and u talk about topics i deliberately ignore on internet :(( :wall: also if u wanna troll check site like pocketnow :giggle: they have lots of windows phone fans u can easily rile them up :--D
velu Posted July 7, 2014 Posted July 7, 2014 samsung going donw sooner than later they r going to fire us all..
Sachin=GOD Posted July 7, 2014 Posted July 7, 2014 The Curse of Smart People A bit over 3 years ago, after working for many years at a series of startups (most of which I co-founded), I disappeared through a Certain Vortex to start working at a Certain Large Company which I won't mention here. But it's not really a secret; you can probably figure it out if you bing around a bit for my name. Anyway, this big company that now employs me is rumoured to hire the smartest people in the world. Question number one: how true is that? Answer: I think it's really true. A suprisingly large fraction of the smartest programmers in the world *do* work here. In very large quantities. In fact, quantities so large that I wouldn't have thought that so many really smart people existed or could be centralized in one place, but trust me, they do and they can. That's pretty amazing. Question number two: but I'm sure they hired some non-smart people too, right? Answer: surprisingly infrequently. When I went for my job interview there, they set me up for a full day of interviewers (5 sessions plus lunch). I decided that I would ask a few questions of my own in these interviews, and try to guess how good the company is based on how many of the interviewers seemed clueless. My hypothesis was that there are always some bad apples in any medium to large company, so if the success rate was, say, 3 or 4 out of 5 interviewers being non-clueless, that's pretty good. Well, they surprised me. I had 5 out of 5 non-clueless interviewers, and in fact, all of them were even better than non-clueless: they impressed me. If this was the average smartness of people around here, maybe the rumours were really true, and they really had something special going on. (I later learned that my evil plan and/or information about my personality *may* have been leaked to the recruiters who *may* have intentionally set me up with especially clueful interviewers to avoid the problem, but this can neither be confirmed nor denied.) Anyway, I continue to be amazed at the overall smartness of people at this place. Overall, very nearly everybody, across the board, surprises or impresses me with how smart they are. Pretty great, right? Yes. But it's not perfect. Smart people have a problem, especially (although not only) when you put them in large groups. That problem is an ability to convincingly rationalize nearly anything. Everybody rationalizes. We all want the world to be a particular way, and we all make mistakes, and we all want to be successful, and we all want to feel good about ourselves. We all make decisions for emotional or intuitive reasons instead of rational ones. Some of us admit that. Some of us think using our emotions is better than being rational all the time. Some of us don't. Smart people, computer types anyway, tend to come down on the side of people who don't like emotions. Programmers, who do logic for a living. Here's the problem. Logic is a pretty powerful tool, but it only works if you give it good input. As the famous computer science maxim says, "garbage in, garbage out." If you know all the constraints and weights - with perfect precision - then you can use logic to find the perfect answer. But when you don't, which is always, there's a pretty good chance your logic will lead you very, very far astray. Most people find this out pretty early on in life, because their logic is imperfect and fails them often. But really, really smart computer geek types may not ever find it out. They start off living in a bubble, they isolate themselves because socializing is unpleasant, and, if they get a good job straight out of school, they may never need to leave that bubble. To such people, it may appear that logic actually works, and that they are themselves logical creatures. I guess I was lucky. I accidentally co-founded what turned into a pretty successful startup while still in school. Since I was co-running a company, I found out pretty fast that I was wrong about things and that the world didn't work as expected most of the time. This was a pretty unpleasant discovery, but I'm very glad I found it out earlier in life instead of later, because I might have wasted even more time otherwise. Working at a large, successful company lets you keep your isolation. If you choose, you can just ignore all the inconvenient facts about the world. You can make decisions based on whatever input you choose. The success or failure of your project in the market is not really that important; what's important is whether it gets canceled or not, a decision which is at the whim of your boss's boss's boss's boss, who, as your only link to the unpleasantly unpredictable outside world, seems to choose projects quasi-randomly, and certainly without regard to the quality of your contribution. It's a setup that makes it very easy to describe all your successes (project not canceled) in terms of your team's greatness, and all your failures (project canceled) in terms of other people's capriciousness. End users and profitability, for example, rarely enter into it. This project isn't supposed to be profitable; we benefit whenever people spend more time online. This project doesn't need to be profitable; we can use it to get more user data. Users are unhappy, but that's just because they're change averse. And so on. What I have learned, working here, is that smart, successful people are cursed. The curse is confidence. It's confidence that comes from a lifetime of success after real success, an objectively great job, working at an objectively great company, making a measurably great salary, building products that get millions of users. You must be smart. In fact, you are smart. You can prove it. Ironically, one of the biggest social problems currently reported at work is lack of confidence, also known as Impostor Syndrome. People with confidence try to help people fix their Impostor Syndrome, under the theory that they are in fact as smart as people say they are, and they just need to accept it. But I think Impostor Syndrome is valuable. The people with Impostor Syndrome are the people who *aren't* sure that a logical proof of their smartness is sufficient. They're looking around them and finding something wrong, an intuitive sense that around here, logic does not always agree with reality, and the obviously right solution does not lead to obviously happy customers, and it's unsettling because maybe smartness isn't enough, and maybe if we don't feel like we know what we're doing, it's because we don't. Impostor Syndrome is that voice inside you saying that not everything is as it seems, and it could all be lost in a moment. The people with the problem are the people who can't hear that voice. http://apenwarr.ca/log/?m=201407#01 He works at Google and is talking about that.
Sachin=GOD Posted July 8, 2014 Posted July 8, 2014 NASA to blast Google 3D sensing Project Tango phones into space http://www.androidcentral.com/nasa-blast-google-3d-sensing-project-tango-phones-space
Lord Posted July 8, 2014 Posted July 8, 2014 offtopic but can someone suggest me a good android at around 13000-14000 rupees.Main requirements : good camera,speakers for music and speed for browsing fb etc
Sachin=GOD Posted July 8, 2014 Posted July 8, 2014 offtopic but can someone suggest me a good android at around 13000-14000 rupees.Main requirements : good camera' date='speakers for music and speed for browsing fb etc[/quote'] You can take a look at Moto G. Its a very good phone at around 14000 (on flipkart). Camera may not be as good but everything else in it is better than any other phone in this range.
rkt.india Posted July 8, 2014 Posted July 8, 2014 offtopic but can someone suggest me a good android at around 13000-14000 rupees.Main requirements : good camera' date='speakers for music and speed for browsing fb etc[/quote'] Samsung galaxy grand quattro
Recommended Posts