Jump to content

Asia cup speed watch thread


the don

Recommended Posts

Posted
Sree contributed nothing to the world cup campaign. ZK' date=' Nehra, Munaf showed that an attack does not need pace to succeed, even in subcontinental conditions. A high quality quick is always handy, but as is a high quality medium pacer.[/quote'] I read your recent posts on Indian bowling. And 1 thing I just can't understand, what makes you think that our medium pacers are good enough to be world class bowlers and pace is just a useless factor in any bowler's development. Do you realize that with current bowling we are matching Bangladesh with their bowling line-up? We r no better than BD in this Asia cup with the bowling line-up that we played in first match. I mean literally, just look at Murtaza, Shahdat Hossain and Islam and compare them 2 ours. One more thing, pace is not everything but pace is a very important factor in any bowler's armory. An international level bowler is always incomplete without pace. Just like a Grand-prix car, that got to have speed, control and all other factors but the basic thing will always be speed. Similarly, a fast bowler got to have, pace, swing, control, reverse swing, ability to take wickets, setting the batsmen up, making use of the crease and stamina. But, if a fast bowler is not fast, then the rest of the factors becomes non-existent.
Posted
I read your recent posts on Indian bowling. And 1 thing I just can't understand, what makes you think that our medium pacers are good enough to be world class bowlers and pace is just a useless factor in any bowler's development. Do you realize that with current bowling we are matching Bangladesh with their bowling line-up? We r no better than BD in this Asia cup with the bowling line-up that we played in first match. I mean literally, just look at Murtaza, Shahdat Hossain and Islam and compare them 2 ours. One more thing, pace is not everything but pace is a very important factor in any bowler's armory. An international level bowler is always incomplete without pace. Just like a Grand-prix car, that got to have speed, control and all other factors but the basic thing will always be speed. Similarly, a fast bowler got to have, pace, swing, control, reverse swing, ability to take wickets, setting the batsmen up, making use of the crease and stamina. But, if a fast bowler is not fast, then the rest of the factors becomes non-existent.
+1. It is not only about pacers, we like benign bowlers who will never become strike bowlers.
Posted

It is quite simple, pace makes the batsmen commit mistakes, trundlers do not have low strike rates, they are dependent on condtions and are waiting for batsmen to give his wicket or commit error.What makes a side great , the first criteria is the bowling attack, the ability to get a side out , not to say there aren't exceptions to the rule, like a very good swing bowler or a left hand bowler who bowls 135 to 140 k's.A trundler is akin to a batsmen who aggregates runs by getting ones and two's, he can't hit boundaries or sixes, he will not put pressure on the fielding side and will not win games for the side,maybe a side can afford only one such player if he is versatile and contributes as a allrounder ala A Mathews.

Posted
It is quite simple' date=' pace makes the batsmen commit mistakes, trundlers do not have low strike rates, they are dependent on condtions and are waiting for batsmen to give his wicket or commit error.What makes a side great , the first criteria is the bowling attack, the ability to get a side out , not to say there aren't exceptions to the rule, like a very good swing bowler or a left hand bowler who bowls 135 to 140 k's.A trundler is akin to a batsmen who aggregates runs by getting ones and two's, he can't hit boundaries or sixes, he will not put pressure on the fielding side and will not win games for the side,maybe a side can afford only one such player if he is versatile and contributes as a allrounder ala A Mathews.[/quote'] Exactly. Thats why it is surprising to see Dhoni persisting with 3 swing bowlers and keeping Dinda out of playing 11....:((
Posted

umar gul and aizaz cheema have been the fastest in the asia cup by a distance, both clocked faster speeds than lasith malinga yesterday, the indian bowlers are all similar paced medium pacers ,safe to say even dinda is a trundler.

Posted

136kph top speed in 2 overs makes you a trundler? I'd dare say there were days where Steyn was a trundler then. Heck, whole series' where Mcgrath was a trundler.

Posted

^ You guys made Dinda out to be mega quick, he is fast medium at best. Like I said before he bowls average of early 130's and can take it to 140 occasionally. Anyway speed is not the be all and end all but just commenting on this thread which is speed watch.

Posted
^ You guys made Dinda out to be mega quick' date=' he is fast medium at best. Like I said before he bowls average of early 130's and can take it to 140 occasionally. Anyway speed is not the be all and end all but just commenting on this thread which is speed watch.[/quote'] Yep. Average 133kph and up to 140kph is the regular speed for a high quality pace bowler.
Posted
136kph top speed in 2 overs makes you a trundler? I'd dare say there were days where Steyn was a trundler then. Heck' date=' whole series' where Mcgrath was a trundler.[/quote'] A trundler is a bowler who neither has pace in the air ( as shown by the speed gun ) OR pace and bounce off the pitch ( which McGrath had ). Hit the deck kind of bowlers are not trundler if they can bowl 130 k +. Dinda has been fast-medium to medium fast as far as pace in the air is concerned but has hit the deck hard and got some bounce on occasions. So, he has neither been a trundler nor fast but somewhere inbetween.
Posted
Yep. Average 133kph and up to 140kph is the regular speed for a high quality pace bowler.
That speed is ok for a highly skilled bowler. Question is, whether Dinda is highly skilled for international cricket ? Only time will tell. If he is not highly skilled for bowling to international batsmen then he will have to be quicker.
Posted
A trundler is a bowler who neither has pace in the air ( as shown by the speed gun ) OR pace and bounce off the pitch ( which McGrath had ). Hit the deck kind of bowlers are not trundler if they can bowl 130 k +. Dinda has been fast-medium to medium fast as far as pace in the air is concerned but has hit the deck hard and got some bounce on occasions. So' date=' he has neither been a trundler nor fast but somewhere inbetween.[/quote'] Good posts. Trundlers are a different variety. The way I see it is they lack pace and also "zip" from the pitch. McGrath and Gillespie in later years may have lost but def not trundlers..
Posted
Good posts. Trundlers are a different variety. The way I see it is they lack pace and also "zip" from the pitch. McGrath and Gillespie in later years may have lost but def not trundlers..
PK and Pathan are great examples of trundlers.
Posted
That speed is ok for a highly skilled bowler. Question is' date=' whether Dinda is highly skilled for international cricket ? Only time will tell. If he is not highly skilled for bowling to international batsmen then he will have to be quicker.[/quote'] Skill (movement, accuracy and variety) is required, whatever the speed of a bowler.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...