Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Hyderbadi logic :cantstop:
Pakistani Hyderabad? but I always heard Lahori logic is far superior? only Madrassi logic can come somewhere near to it.
Posted
i seen Srinath Bowling in 1999 his Average pace is around 135kph not 155kph :hysterical::hysterical:
In 1999, Wasim was averaging 132 k Waqar 135 k and Srinath 136 k. The fastest balls I have seen these 3 bowl, after the speed gun was regularly used from 1999, was Srinath. 150 k Waqar. 144 k Akram 142 k The fastest ball heard of before 1999 by these 3 pacers Srinath. 156 k Waqar. 153. k Wasim. 145 k So there you are. :hatsoff:
Posted

Abu nachim fastest was close to 142K, has bowled 4 balls more than 140 out of 18 balls..... He has a Good smooth rhythm and good line n length....he is slower than what he was last year. Pawan sanyal was faster though....

Posted

No Indian can bring me proof of srinath 156k ball, but I can show you proof of waqar at his peak or maybe after not sure exactly, look at the speed guns reading at 52.10. Cab9GBSxZn4

Posted
srinath fastest ball 149k a guy that barely bowled above 140k is going to bowl 156k yh very believable. I have seen that video no where close to 150k
149 was in 1999 wc. He was at his quickest till 1997. He suffered a shoulder injury ans underwent a reconstruction surgery. In 1996, SA tour, he was quicker than Donald according to Alistair Campbell in that article. You can watch his bowling video of 1996 England tour that is one of the quickest stuff you would see by any fast bowler in test cricket.
Posted
149 was in 1999 wc. He was at his quickest till 1997. He suffered a shoulder injury ans underwent a reconstruction surgery. In 1996' date=' SA tour, he was quicker than Donald according to Alistair Campbell in that article. You can watch his bowling video of 1996 England tour that is one of the quickest stuff you would see by any fast bowler in test cricket.[/quote'] bwjGk3fmMtc :giggle: not even close to 150k
Posted
149 was in 1999 wc. He was at his quickest till 1997. He suffered a shoulder injury ans underwent a reconstruction surgery. In 1996' date=' SA tour, he was quicker than Donald according to Alistair Campbell in that article. You can watch his bowling video of 1996 England tour that is one of the quickest stuff you would see by any fast bowler in test cricket.[/quote'] Srinath was Faster than Waqar :hysterical::hysterical:
Posted
Exactly Srinath was always faster than Wasim And waqar....Wasim was always less than 142K But Shoab was faster than srinath
Yes. But Shoaib's action was always suspect, to put it politely. After the speed guns have been used regularly, Indians have produced quicker pacers than Pakistan , among pacers with clean action. Only Pakistani chuckers were quicker. Makes you wonder whether the speed of Pakistani pacers before the speed gun era was largely hype and most of them were fast-medium only. Just like they are trying to. pass off a seam and swing bowler of ordinary pace , like Junaid , as fast. The speed gun is catching this hype but , in the 80s and 90s, they would have succeeded in marketing Junaid as fast.
Posted
Srinath was Faster than Waqar :hysterical::hysterical:
Also Srinath never used bottle caps and other methods for reverse-swinging yorkers....earned his wickets fair and square
Posted
even after speed guns were in place pak has sami' date=' akhtar,wahab,gul all have bowled faster then indian bowlers.[/quote'] And helped ball to reach boundary even faster.
Posted
even after speed guns were in place pak has sami' date=' akhtar,wahab,gul all have bowled faster then indian bowlers.[/quote'] I don't know how you think Gul or Wahab are quicker than Umesh or Aaron ! Again, the hype comes in. Shoaib had a really suspect action. Just my point. Sami bowled quick at the cost of everything. He has a test average of 52, about 15 more than our worst pacer. I don't know whether pace at the cost of such sh*t bowling means anything.
Posted

Let's move on and agree we have always been a batting country and Paki's a bowling country. We might have 10 good bowlers in our history but rest have been mediocre with moments of fame. But we can destroy Pak's bowling with ease.

Posted
I don't know how you think Gul or Wahab are quicker than Umesh or Aaron ! Again, the hype comes in. Shoaib had a really suspect action. Just my point. Sami bowled quick at the cost of everything. He has a test average of 52, about 15 more than our worst pacer. I don't whether pace at the cost of such **** bowling means anything.
what is aaron fastest ball in international cricket? check these threads to see guls pace. http://indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=263253&highlight=umar http://indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=263130&highlight=umar even RKT says he hit 95mph in 1 of these threads.
Posted
I don't know how you think Gul or Wahab are quicker than Umesh or Aaron ! Again, the hype comes in. Shoaib had a really suspect action. Just my point. Sami bowled quick at the cost of everything. He has a test average of 52, about 15 more than our worst pacer. I don't whether pace at the cost of such sh*t bowling means anything.
Sami still Better than Yadav Yadav ball at 6.25 econ rate 17 Odi 17 wicket,s Ave-47:hysterical::hysterical: Econ 6.27:hysterical::hysterical: :--D:dance::dance:
×
×
  • Create New...