Crookbond Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 ^ Now, if I start doing IFs and BUTs I can mess up almost any format. IMO, we should have only 10 teams playing the main league of a WC. The ODI's in between those 4 years should decide who compromises those 10. Link to comment
Tridibans_16 Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 Do you know who Dexter Morgan stands for ? I know he is portrayed by Michael Hall but never read any of the books TBH :--D BTW I was a fan of him when he played the role of David in Six feet under Link to comment
Tridibans_16 Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 ^ Now' date=' if I start doing IFs and BUTs I can mess up almost any format. IMO, we should have only 10 teams playing the main league of a WC. The ODI's in between those 4 years should decide who compromises those 10.[/quote'] But then there will never be any of IRL/ZIM/AFG. Link to comment
Tridibans_16 Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 I think we must win against Aussies. Saffers may be a tough nut to crack with the form of Amla/Morkel and Steyn. If we lose on Friday, it will be do or die against Pakistan, which may be too much for our feeble out of form batsmen (Gauti/Viru/Dhoni/Yuvi). and the trundlers. On the other hand if we win against Aus then we can have Pak playing for do or die (as I seroiusly don't see them beating SAF) which might be perfect for us considering their lack of batting. Link to comment
Crookbond Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 But then there will never be any of IRL/ZIM/AFG. May be ... may be not if you do not grant default places to Bangladesh, Zimbabwe and West Indies. IMO, 4 positions in the bottom of the ICC ODI rankings over 4 years should be up for grabs. Link to comment
Lord Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 I think we must win against Aussies. Saffers may be a tough nut to crack with the form of Amla/Morkel and Steyn. If we lose on Friday, it will be do or die against Pakistan, which may be too much for our feeble out of form batsmen (Gauti/Viru/Dhoni/Yuvi). and the trundlers. On the other hand if we win against Aus then we can have Pak playing for do or die (as I seroiusly don't see them beating SAF) which might be perfect for us considering their lack of batting. what u r not considering is SA's choke power Link to comment
maniac Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 Chawla pwning not just us but also Steyn and Morkel http://www.iccworldtwenty20.com/men/stats/2012/fastest-ball http://i.imgur.com/ZluGb.jpg[/iM] :WTF: Link to comment
Tridibans_16 Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 what u r not considering is SA's choke power They will do that in the semis. They can't choke twice in the super eights which means with two wins, they are almost qualified for semis. Link to comment
Lord Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 They will do that in the semis. They can't choke twice in the super eights which means with two wins' date=' they are almost qualified for semis.[/quote'] they dont need to choke twice.refer 2007 T20 WC.they'll find a way to choke Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 Strategy should be fearless cricket. Link to comment
Lord Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 Strategy should be fearless cricket. :agree: even yesterday they were too cautious while batting I think Link to comment
BeautifulGame Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 May be ... may be not if you do not grant default places to Bangladesh' date=' Zimbabwe and West Indies. IMO, 4 positions in the bottom of the ICC ODI rankings over 4 years should be up for grabs.[/quote'] Thats unfair on associates.They will never be able to beat the likes of WI or Ban to a spot in ICC wc.When the likes of WI regularly play against top teams and the likes of Ireland and Afgan playing against the likes of Bermuda all through the year it would be daft to ask Afgan to compete with WI for a spot in wc. Link to comment
saket123 Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 too early to say hes back.its just Eng were pathetic +1 Link to comment
vvvslaxman Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 :agree: even yesterday they were too cautious while batting I think yea.. too much overthinking. Kohli was the only one who just did not give respect to any bowler. He kept charging down. Gauti with ultra low backlift was timid most of the time. He was very conscious of not dragging the ball on to stumps or edging one or getting bounced out. No way he can accelerate with that frame of mind. Yes.. you gotta be calculative. That part should be les sin a T20. It gotta be attack all the way. Link to comment
Lord Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 yea.. too much overthinking. Kohli was the only one who just did not give respect to any bowler. He kept charging down. Gauti with ultra low backlift was timid most of the time. He was very conscious of not dragging the ball on to stumps or edging one or getting bounced out. No way he can accelerate with that frame of mind. Yes.. you gotta be calculative. That part should be les sin a T20. It gotta be attack all the way. which is why I want him out n play 5 bowlers,despite his 45 yesterday Link to comment
Crookbond Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 Thats unfair on associates.They will never be able to beat the likes of WI or Ban to a spot in ICC wc.When the likes of WI regularly play against top teams and the likes of Ireland and Afgan playing against the likes of Bermuda all through the year it would be daft to ask Afgan to compete with WI for a spot in wc. I am asking for associates to regularly play top teams as well in between the WC. Basically, I have taken a leaf out of the FIFA style where even the winner of the previous WC has to qualify. In addition, T20 can accommodate 16 teams without qualification. Four groups of 4 and the top 2 in each group move towards a QF leading to SF and Finals. No brainer really. Link to comment
Crookbond Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 I don't think they were over thinking. I would rather prefer India getting 170-5 with a chance to win rather than 120 or 200 depending on some luck. Link to comment
ravishingravi Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 It has begun. Chewtiyapa Link to comment
Crookbond Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 too early to say hes back.its just Eng were pathetic Exactly what the author is saying. Link to comment
Tridibans_16 Posted September 24, 2012 Share Posted September 24, 2012 I am asking for associates to regularly play top teams as well in between the WC. Basically, I have taken a leaf out of the FIFA style where even the winner of the previous WC has to qualify. In addition, T20 can accommodate 16 teams without qualification. Four groups of 4 and the top 2 in each group move towards a QF leading to SF and Finals. No brainer really. I think that is what they are going to do from the next edition onwards. I remember it reading somewhere that 16 teams will be competing in the T20 ec in BANG(2014) and in Ind(2016). Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now