Crookbond Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 Another instance of MoM for captaincy - Captain getting it even after getting out for a duck. http://static.espncricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/1980S/1984/ENG_LOCAL/B+H/LANCS_WARWICKS_B+H_21JUL1984.html For captaincy. Now thats a first. It has happened in international cricket as well. Bob Willis, England vs Sri Lanka, Leeds 1983 WC http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/65084.html Mark Taylor, Australia vs West Indies, Sydney B&H 1992 http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/65495.html
Lord Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 It has happened in international cricket as well. Bob Willis, England vs Sri Lanka, Leeds 1983 WC http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/65084.html Mark Taylor, Australia vs West Indies, Sydney B&H 1992 http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/65495.html in first Willis bowled a good spell too,Taylor took 4 catches,but just as ridiculous
Laaloo Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 Sarkar ko phainty maarna mushkil hi nahin namumkin hi hain
Texy Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 Pooh!!..Who cares...just a dead rubber...:asleep: That's exactly how we feel every time facing SL.:hatsoff:
CSK Fan Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 get off those drugs. All of them? At least let me do a couple
suraj Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 It has happened in international cricket as well. Bob Willis, England vs Sri Lanka, Leeds 1983 WC http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/65084.html Mark Taylor, Australia vs West Indies, Sydney B&H 1992 http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/match/65495.html Dude Bob Willis had a spell of 9-4-9-1 & SL was restricted to 136
Texy Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 Bet Jadeja got the actual MoM award later that night from Dhobi :boffing:
maniac Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 Yea what ever no pakistani can give me phainty i m not manmohan singh. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
maniac Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 Business as usual. :hysterical: :hysterical: Is there an anti-anti Kohli Club :finger:
Ultimate_Game Posted January 6, 2013 Posted January 6, 2013 @UG don't worry too much about India producing a world class bowling attack' date=' history tells us that they never have and I say that they never will, refer to this thread [url']http://indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=283693 Even the current trundlers for Pakis and as the history tells us Pakis have been our bi@tch when it counts and will remain our bi@tches - with or without world class bowling attack We need world class attack for likes of Aussies and Saffers but for Pakis just letting them know it's a "World Cup" game against India is enough and they will cr@p their pants :giggle:
Cevno Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 This mom stinks. TV commentaotrs apparently decided mom. Suny was told this on NDTV and wrly smiled and said "i was not asked and i was tv comm." Small example of indian cricket stinking at the moment. Shukla was at the match, he probably fixed after text from srivi. Fat ****s Tv Commentators eh ? Shastri probably decided then. :giggle:
CG Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Tv Commentators eh ? Shastri probably decided then. :giggle: Lol its probably true
barfi Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Paul Nixon alleges India-Pak Kotla ODI was fixed Paul Nixon alleges India-Pak Kotla ODI fixed Cricketnext Staff, Cricketnext.com | 06-Jan 20:14 PM New Delhi: Former England wicketkeeper Paul Nixon on Sunday suggested that Pakistan players deliberately threw the dead rubber ODI against India at the Feroz Shah Kotla in New Delhi on Sunday. "Pakistan throwing this game away eh. Watch this space. Pakistan will just loose last few balls," he tweeted during the latter half of Pakistan's collapse, which saw the visitors lose their last six wickets for 38 runs, including 2 for 12 in the batting Powerplay, to give India a consolation victory. When one of his followers asked Nixon whether he was alluding that the match had been rigged, the 42-year-old tweeted, "r u watching the game???" He further retweeted several tweets, including these two: "this game is a joke especially when u see hafeez play a lap sweep with a leg slip in place" and "It must be India's 12th Man.....the Bookmaker!" Nixon, who played 19 ODIs and one Twenty20 international for England in 2007, including the World Cup in the Caribbean, went on to suggest that it was no big deal for Pakistan to throw the final match of the series when they had already clinched the series. "2-0 up perfect to loose nothing matters," he tweeted in reply to a follower who questioned his assertion. Nixon used hashtags like #somethingnotright and #dodgey. India pulled off an unlikely victory in the third ODI by beating Pakistan by 10 runs after scoring just 167. The visitors won the first two ODIs by six wickets and 85 runs respectively. In June 2012, Nixon made a sensational revelation in his book Keeping Quiet - Paul Nixon: The Autobiography that he was offered five million dollars from an Indian bookie named as 'K' to throw a domestic T20 match
Ultimate_Game Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Yup... I didn't see match fixing kaanspiracy theories coming after Pakis lose to India :giggle: Just like 2011 WC semi, 2003 WC game, 99 WC game, 96 WC game... and so on :haha: In fact Indo Pak record should look like the following... Pak won - X, Ind won - 0, Abandoned - Y, Fixed - Z
CG Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Does it really matter?? Yes it does, Just shows the nexus that exists in indian cricket. and dhoni was moron enough to accept it people sometimes even though got the award have the humility to call other man who deserved it mor eon stage and share but the selfish morn than dhoni is he could not do that.
vamos_rafa Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Yes it does' date=' Just shows the nexus that exists in indian cricket.[/quote'] Okay. Then it's a serious thing!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now