adi B Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Just wanted to know' date=' what is the meaning of a spitting track?[/quote'] i think it must be venom spitting track,dangerous as hell
adi B Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 i hope hyderabad pitch is similar..we should play ojha instead of bhajji,rahane in place f ishant.
crics Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Australia have themselves to blame. They won the toss which was crucial. Wrong decision by umpire allowed them to add about 100 extra runs in their first innings. Still they are going to lose by an inning shows their lack of quality spinners
carnish Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Sidhu says ... Henriques ke paas ujjwal bhabisya hai.
carnish Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Hyderabad wont be similar to this track ... Hyderabad will turn but there will be a lot more bounce here for the seamers. Hence although it will be good for our spinners it will also be good news for pattinson and starc. And bhajji is back :nervous:
BeautifulGame Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Just wanted to know' date=' what is the meaning of a spitting track?[/quote'] Pitches were ball bounce chest high from good length I think
bharat297 Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 justified his selection a bit.if we play one seamer next match' date='it should be him n not Ishant[/quote'] I don't think we can afford just one seamer. We should also factor in reverse swing. I'd make the following changes: * Ojha for Harbhajan * Dinda for Ishant * And depending on the wicket, Rahane for Jadeja.
SLICKR392 Posted February 25, 2013 Author Posted February 25, 2013 I don't think we can afford just one seamer. We should also factor in reverse swing. I'd make the following changes: * Ojha for Harbhajan * Dinda for Ishant * And depending on the wicket, Rahane for Jadeja. Aussies will eat Dinda. Rather stick with Harbhajjan and drop Ishant for Ojha. Harbhajjan should be used as a part timer.
Ankur Upadhyay Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Aussies will eat Dinda. Rather stick with Harbhajjan and drop Ishant for Ojha. Harbhajjan should be used as a part timer. then choose raina or yuvraj.. they can fulfill that 'part timer' role better... or give rasool or jalaj saxena a chance..
bharat297 Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Aussies will eat Dinda. Rather stick with Harbhajjan and drop Ishant for Ojha. Harbhajjan should be used as a part timer. Dinda should at least be given a chance. If he can get swing he might be effective, especially if he can get reverse. It's unfair to not reward a consistent domestic performer.
bharat297 Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 then choose raina or yuvraj.. they can fulfill that 'part timer' role better... or give rasool or jalaj saxena a chance.. I'm just going by the squad. Obviously the ideal choice would be Zaheer or Yadav, but it's only Dinda as the other paceman.
SLICKR392 Posted February 25, 2013 Author Posted February 25, 2013 then choose raina or yuvraj.. they can fulfill that 'part timer' role better... or give rasool or jalaj saxena a chance.. Rasool is fine but please no Yuvi or Raina anywhere near the Test side.
Lord Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 I don't think we can afford just one seamer. We should also factor in reverse swing. I'd make the following changes: * Ojha for Harbhajan * Dinda for Ishant * And depending on the wicket, Rahane for Jadeja. even one seamer seems too much.Dinda??:haha: Ojha should should come in for Ishant.Rahane for Vijay/Bhajji depending on the wicket
Needforspeed Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 What happened to the pitch in the last hour when the Aussies added 56 runs for the last wicket?
Sooda Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 ^Yeah could score runs if you knuckeld down. Aus didnt help themselves by picking one spinner...
bharat297 Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Oh look don't get me wrong I'm not a big fan of Dinda but I think the mentality that we can just go with one seamer because it worked in the first test is not a good one. It's complacent. Knowing Australia, they are going to improve against spin and we need to have an extra option of reverse swing. Based on the pacemen selected in the current squad, Dinda seems more likely to exploit reverse swing than Ishant who is just banging it into the deck at the moment. Obviously it would be best if Zaheer or Yadav were there but I'm just going by the squad selected.
ravishingravi Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Sidhu says ... Henriques ke paas ujjwal bhabisya hai. :hysterical::hysterical:
DomainK Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Three centuries, one double century, three half centuries and we still have people whining about the pitch.
rkt.india Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Dinda should at least be given a chance. If he can get swing he might be effective' date=' especially if he can get reverse. It's unfair to not reward a consistent domestic performer.[/quote'] I have never seen Dinda getting swing or reverse even in FC.
CG Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 Hyd will have swing and better bounce than this pitch so 2 seamers will play .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now