Jump to content

Australia Tour of India 2013 |Feb-Mar|


SLICKR392

Australia Tour of India 2013 |Feb-Mar|  

  1. 1.

    • Dhawan
      4
    • Dinda
      3
    • Ojha
      6
    • Rahane
      4


Recommended Posts

Posted
:hysterical: Just because its an Australian captain, any decision he makes "has to be good" or "sportive" :facepalm:
Really? How many times Ponting was accused of being a good captain? Clarke has shown enterprise as a captain so far, even though he doesn't have a really good team under him. I'm 100% sure he wouldn't have settled for a draw the way India did in that test match in Windies in 2011. That was one of the most timid captaincy I've ever seen.
Posted
Really? How many times Ponting was accused of being a good captain? Clarke has shown enterprise as a captain so far, even though he doesn't have a really good team under him. I'm 100% sure he wouldn't have settled for a draw the way India did in that test match in Windies in 2011. That was one of the most timid captaincy I've ever seen.
I've been an admirer of Clarke for his aggressive captaincy in the past but this is nothing but desperation. Also whats the point of adding the WI bit? This isn't a Dhoni v Clarke thread.
Posted

Wickets of Vijay and Sehwag are there for the asking any time the Aussies want it, but missing out on another possible 30-40 runs could prove to be costly for them. You dont need to declare to dismiss Vijay and Sehwag.

Posted
Agree with what you're trying to say except the last line.
Arey Both of you unhappy with my burial ground comment ..I cant see why?? We all know that Mohali and Hyderabad always has bounce, Yes India has a stronghold in Mohali but thats because we havent been seeing turners at Mohali prior to Dhoni asking for turners in the last series. When we have pitches with cracks opening up and still have bounce especially bounce, it will be easily a game for either side considering India's falling batting standards off late. However, current Australian side is pretty inexperienced to take the advantages of that. Had England been here, it would have been a different case. The only flaw in my comment though is I never watch the test at Eden Gardens and dont know how the pitch behaved for India to be losing that one as we all know Kolkata to be traditionally low and slow turner. Maybe you can tell me better.
Posted

It was a gamble, had Pattinson snared Sehwag which was very possible we would have hailed it as a great decision. In hindsight it is easy to say they should have batted longer

Posted

Didnt see the 2nd part of today's game especially after tea. Sad to miss out on the collapse. But anyways this declaration as it seems is a very bad move by CLarke especially since first innings runs are crucial on a pitch which will definitely turn on day 3 and day 4. Australia have missed a trick by giving up on some cheap last wicket runs that Indians were going to provide.

Posted

The odd few runs would be made up for by getting Sehwag cheaply (they may still do anyway). Forget Mooli Bhijay. Just a move that did not pay off but nothing revolutionary nor criminal.

Posted
This thread is too all the Dhoni haters who say that he is the main culprit behind our test team. Hopefully it will open their eyes
I don't care if he is the main culprit or not..the guy is not suited for test captaincy.
Posted

A drowning man grabs at a straw hoping it would turn into a rope and everyone starts clapping calling it a great decision. He should have just kept swimming gaining another mile towards the shore.

Posted

Clarke took a gamble which didn't pay off. 3 overs were too few to snare 1 or 2 wickets. But was Clarke right in his thinking that Sehwag or Vijay were more likely to get out in these 3 overs then any other 3 overs. What was different in these 3 overs? Playing conditions were worse for these 3 overs and which he thought to be improving in morning? I would have suggested overnight declaration so that Australians had a chance to exploit early morning juice in pitch. Would have given extra 5 overs to my tail-enders.

Posted

This shameless guy Ishant must be kicked out. I guess Ishant is still there because he is economical despite of not picking any wickets, thereby building pressure.Also his fitness is legendary like agarkar.

Posted
Clarke took a gamble which didn't pay off. 3 overs were too few to snare 1 or 2 wickets. But was Clarke right in his thinking that Sehwag or Vijay were more likely to get out in these 3 overs then any other 3 overs. What was different in these 3 overs? Playing conditions were worse for these 3 overs and which he thought to be improving in morning? I would have suggested overnight declaration so that Australians had a chance to exploit early morning juice in pitch. Would have given extra 5 overs to my tail-enders.
Clarke wanted to surprise and go into the EOD with an mental advantage of 1 Indian wicket to prep up his troops. It was more a mental ploy than anything.
Posted
Good declaration. But the batsmen he was trying to dismiss didnt need any of these pressure situations. They will get out sooner than later tomorrow anyway
:cantstop: So true

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...