SLICKR392 Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 England will recover in Ashes How? Aussies will hammer them.
FischerTal Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 How? Aussies will hammer them. Patto will rip them apart :ohyeah:
Sachin=GOD Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 WE ARE NO.2 :woot: yeah....but we don't play a test for another 5 months so may go down :( How? Aussies will hammer them. United Nations of England winning this one IMO.
SLICKR392 Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 United Nations of England winning this one IMO. :cantstop:
JaFanatic Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 no.2 in tests 1 in ODIs and 3 in T20Is!! We're the best team in world cricket now :proud:
velu Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 no.2 in tests 1 in ODIs and 3 in T20Is!! We're the best team in world cricket now :proud: best batting and best fielding side ATM :proud:
JaFanatic Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 best batting and best fielding side ATM :proud: best spin attack in world cricket :proud:
SLICKR392 Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 best spin attack in world cricket :proud: Best ODI opening bowler. :proud:
Lord Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 best batting and best fielding side ATM :proud: SA is that still
carnish Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 Something Seriously fishy ... :hmmmm2: 1. How are Australia on 4 after getting hammered by us 4-0 ... while Pakistan are on 5th?? 2. How are we on 2nd when England just did poorly in one series, which they didn't even lose. 3. How come NZL are on 8th when they have had some amazing results in last 2 years ..Drew in SRL and AUS 1-1, Lost to Ind and Eng 2-0 Away Drew against then No.2 England at home ... They seemed to have done better than Lankans who even lost to Pakistan even.
G_B_ Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 Something Seriously fishy ... :hmmmm2: 1. How are Australia on 4 after getting hammered by us 4-0 ... while Pakistan are on 5th?? 2. How are we on 2nd when England just did poorly in one series, which they didn't even lose. 3. How come NZL are on 8th when they have had some amazing results in last 2 years ..Drew in SRL and AUS 1-1, Lost to Ind and Eng 2-0 Away Drew against then No.2 England at home ... They seemed to have done better than Lankans who even lost to Pakistan even. 1. Australia have a solid home record. Infact ahead of losing 4-0 to India they had won a lot of series. 2. Well they lost 3-0 to Pak in UAE 2-0 to SA and drew 0-0 with lowly new zealand. Their 4-0 victory over India was also pushed back as it was in 2011 and given less importance. 3. You need to win. Draws dont get you much in terms of climbing the ladder.
G_B_ Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 I personally think that England and South Africa are better outfits in the test matches than India. South africa though will be extremely hard to catch. India Australia England all have to play them at home in the coming years. While they dont have a great record in the past years of winning. There they have never lost a series. A 16 point difference is going to be hard to overcome. I think SA are going to be top of the test rankings for another 2-3 years from this date.
carnish Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 1. Australia have a solid home record. Infact ahead of losing 4-0 to India they had won a lot of series. 2. Well they lost 3-0 to Pak in UAE 2-0 to SA and drew 0-0 with lowly new zealand. Their 4-0 victory over India was also pushed back as it was in 2011 and given less importance. 3. You need to win. Draws dont get you much in terms of climbing the ladder. Someone please find the facts ... Its difficult for me to do as I am using my cell phone now ... I believe results from 12 months ago are not considered and Rankings change every 1st of Sept. IIRC. If you're saying 4-0 win over India is forgotten as it was 2011, when was the 3-0 defeat to Pakistan buddy?? It was early 2012 ... January if I am right, how can that be included then.
G_B_ Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 Someone please find the facts ... Its difficult for me to do as I am using my cell phone now ... I believe results from 12 months ago are not considered and Rankings change every 1st of Sept. IIRC. If you're saying 4-0 win over India is forgotten as it was 2011, when was the 3-0 defeat to Pakistan buddy?? It was early 2012 ... January if I am right, how can that be included then. nobody said its forgotten. It is simply pushed back and given less importance. In terms of rankings the 2-0 loss to SA probably hurt them more than the 3-0 to pak. Series played in the first two years of the four-year limit count half; essentially, recent matches are given more weight.
ShebbySB Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 Test rankings should be like this atm:- SA Eng Ind Aus Pak WI NZ Sri Bang
carnish Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 nobody said its forgotten. It is simply pushed back and given less importance. In terms of rankings the 2-0 loss to SA probably hurt them more than the 3-0 to pak. That might be it. Anyways, these ranking system is too poor. Need to have difference in points for home and away wins.
G_B_ Posted July 8, 2013 Posted July 8, 2013 every ranking system will have a flaw. I agree that away wins should be ranked more than wins at home. Sa will probably zoom further away
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now