Ram Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 So much so for name calling. I say again (and hopefully you shall understand it better now). With Sachin in the team we did NOT win, we Sachin OUT we did. Samjha? Good now get lost. xxx Lurks , very disappointed with that reaction. Sachin was the best batsman in the odis against england and the quickest too.
SightForTheGods Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 I don't care...win or loose...his batting is amazing to watch. At his best he is The Sight For The Gods :beer_yum:
goose Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 Tendulkar would have been an asset to this side make no mistake. 100%. guaranteed.
SightForTheGods Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 There is no doubt...his recent average has been very good. He might not have hit centuries but hit soo many 50s and let alone the 90s.
Guest BossBhai Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 -- Removed on request of the user --
sachin_fan Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 tendulkar has a strike rate of 88 in ODI's after playing close to 400 of them...am sure he can turn it on when neeeded...this would have been the perfect place for him to let loose, without worrying about saving wickets of pressure of a collapse...
SightForTheGods Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 i just dont understand how he would have cost us the tourney....wrong to claim that
Ram Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 This speculation about Sachin in 20/20's isnt just speculation by oppurtunistic fans. Its not like we got eliminated in the first round and we are all saying - " If only Sachin was there..." If Hayden can be among the top scorers , so can Sachin. He isnt the worst fielder either. But its a good thing Ganguly didnt play.
yoda Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 who cares? we won, that's all should matter. feel sorry for sachin yes. but don't speculate that we would have won if he had played. cause if he had played, someone would have to sit out and no it can't be a convinient person who didn't score in a match. plus he isn't exactly to known to perform in grand finals as we lost like a gazillion of them with him in the team.
sachin_fan Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 This speculation about Sachin in 20/20's isnt just speculation by oppurtunistic fans. Its not like we got eliminated in the first round and we are all saying - " If only Sachin was there..." If Hayden can be among the top scorers , so can Sachin. He isnt the worst fielder either. But its a good thing Ganguly didnt play. MM, its wrong to pick ganguly out. He is as clean a striker of the cricket ball as anyone else. His lofted drives over cover and huge sixes will always make a difference ot the team....... one aspect which could be a problem , is fielding. But hell, we could always substitute with dinesh karthik in that department... ganguly has been bowling pretty decently these days...
Ram Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 who cares? we won, that's all should matter. feel sorry for sachin yes. but don't speculate that we would have won if he had played. cause if he had played, someone would have to sit out and no it can't be a convinient person who didn't score in a match. plus he isn't exactly to known to perform in grand finals as we lost like a gazillion of them with him in the team. To say " Who cares ? we won !" is just plain dumb. So , would you have called for Sachin's entry into the team had we lost ? Bear in mind , its just a matter of balls between glory and pain in 20/20. India won , great .. but to say we cant question anything is just not acceptable.
beetle Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 >>>plus he isn't exactly to known to perform in grand finals as we lost like a gazillion of them with him in the team. and almost every match was a do or die match....
Ram Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 MM, its wrong to pick ganguly out. He is as clean a striker of the cricket ball as anyone else. His lofted drives over cover and huge sixes will always make a difference ot the team....... one aspect which could be a problem , is fielding. But hell, we could always substitute with dinesh karthik in that department... ganguly has been bowling pretty decently these days... Nope , even in ODIs , ganguly's hitting has been one-dimenensional, either over mid-wicket or cover. Even if scored at a RR of 100 , that wont have been enough. It was a good thing he didnt play.
Gambit Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 He sounded over the moon when interviewed on IBN. I think he is the most passionate Indian cricket fan there is! He was overjoyed.
veer Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 yeahh i feel sorry for him too.. but then again WC07 was there.. they (all seniors) had a good chance.. they should have teken mantra of.. ''play your best and dont worry about RESULTS'' but no they had different mind sets.. and not of champions...
zubinpepsi Posted September 24, 2007 Author Posted September 24, 2007 He sounded over the moon when interviewed on IBN. I think he is the most passionate Indian cricket fan there is! He was overjoyed. yes... he kept on talkingggggg.. he sounded very delighteddddd said hes always with the team doesnt matter where he is.. and he lll b always with the team..... WTG Sachinnnnnn. U ROCK!!!!!!!!1:two_thumbs_up:
sachin_fan Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 Nope ' date=' even in ODIs , ganguly's hitting has been one-dimenensional, either over mid-wicket or cover. Even if scored at a RR of 100 , that wont have been enough. It was a good thing he didnt play.[/quote'] what about his square drives, his classy off drives and flicks,, one major thing against him is the pull / hook. But if thats your case to point , a lot of players are one dimensional and still have a huge presence....i guess its about how good you are in that dimension...i feel ganguly would have made his presence felt...
Ram Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 what about his square drives' date=' his classy off drives and flicks,, one major thing against him is the pull / hook. But if thats your case to point , a lot of players are one dimensional and still have a huge presence....i guess its about how good you are in that dimension...i feel ganguly would have made his presence felt...[/quote'] His fielding is just too pathetic anyways.. he would have been a BIG liability.
Bumper Posted September 24, 2007 Posted September 24, 2007 This is not the time to feel sorry folks. Its time to celebrate. I know how the three warriors feel. They have my sympathies. But am afraid we may not have won with these three on the field. The biggest reason we won this tourney is because of our approach to each game. Not to mention the running between the wickets and fielding. These little things made a great impact in close games.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now