Old guy Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 PM if you want more explanations later :--D ok:winky:
Crookbond Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Police has 100 of hours of audio conversations - Delhi Police Comissioner.
rkt.india Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Hands are tied regarding politicians. Then this whole thing is just a waste of time. :(( Declare IPL like WWE that is it. All will make money, more money.:giggle:
kubrickian Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 International cricket do not have so many controversies like IPL. Lets face it' date= IPL governing council is a failure and we see growing controversies every year, let it be Spot fixing, drug case, slapgate and what not. And all this shame for what? A t'20 league which runs for 2 months having stopped all international games? Definitely not worth. It did not help Indian cricket it any way and only increases the grid and rift among players. Not sure if serious. I think spot fixing happens all the time in international cricket, especially when smaller teams are involved. Its an easy way to make money for cricketers who otherwise wouldnt get paid much. It doesnt get exposed easily.
Magneto Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 the DP commissioner is himself corrupt tbh :offtopic:
Crookbond Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Will not be bookies in heavy loss I'd bowler has agreed to give 'x' runs but gives away less than 'x' even he tries hard. Not necessarily. Sreesanth gave away 1 run less but bookies have some cushion. Bookies made crores on that deal. Sreesanth got the money.
Magneto Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Then this whole thing is just a waste of time. :(( Declare IPL like WWE that is it. All will make money' date=' more money.:giggle:[/quote'] I know you are pissed, but you need to be realistic as well.
Crookbond Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 This case was actually not the focus the Delhi Police just "came across this incident".
rageaddict Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Mallu reporters trying their best to get a positive response about MonkeySanth...:cantstop: Thats rite. Yeh Delhi mai etne Malyali reporters kaha se gaye. Saar Saar lol.
G_B_ Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Neeraj Kumar is clearly enjoying this spotlight, after all the negative publicity he had recently.. That Mallu reporter: "Saar Saar, Did the bookies directly handed over monrey (Mallu accent) to Srisanth? Saar.. Please please... :cantstop: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Magneto Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Lol' date=' most of the media speculation was so wrong. They claimed Tait involved, Sreesanth as ring leader and what not[/quote'] Sreesanth probably introduced Chandila to the bookies. Was the Jiju guy prominent in this?
Detonator Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 maybe cause they are all involved with/in in mumbai? Its hardly rocket science dude. it's supposed to be an appreciation :dontmentionit: NRI, living in Mumbai, having a friend to get match tickets, :nice:
Lord Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 even if they have the cushion of say 4 runs.how are they sure Sree would give even 10 runs That was not such a bad over IIRC.Could have easily been frugal if batsmen chose to play carefully(i.e. if they had lost wickets) :hmmm:
G_B_ Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 it's supposed to be an appreciation :dontmentionit: NRI, living in Mumbai, having a friend to get match tickets, :nice: PIO living in UK who visits mumbai on a regular basis and gets tickets via cousin who is part of the MCA......
Magneto Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Thats more to do with poor form of others than him being selected. Mumbai created some flat pitches this season. I ankit's batting probably got him in he is already 27-28. So not a young man in the context of cricket. Being 27 is not really an issue. Stuart Binny is a contender at the same age. Chavan was a handy batsman and a good fielder as well.
Crookbond Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Sreesanth probably introduced Chandila to the bookies. Was the Jiju guy prominent in this? He only seems to be an introduction to Sreesanth.
CSK Fan Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 Sreesanth probably introduced Chandila to the bookies. Was the Jiju guy prominent in this? Jiju was the one who told bookies that Sree will give the signal with a towel. Sree had said, I won't give any obvious signal
G_B_ Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 even if they have the cushion of say 4 runs.how are they sure Sree would give even 10 runs That was not such a bad over IIRC.Could have easily been frugal if batsmen chose to play carefully(i.e. if they had lost wickets) :hmmm: even with the Chavan over. Who knew Maxwell had it in him :cantstop:
Crookbond Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 even if they have the cushion of say 4 runs.how are they sure Sree would give even 10 runs That was not such a bad over IIRC.Could have easily been frugal if batsmen chose to play carefully(i.e. if they had lost wickets) :hmmm: It's no longer about good/bad. It can happen for even for 4-5 runs over as well.
CSK Fan Posted May 16, 2013 Posted May 16, 2013 even if they have the cushion of say 4 runs.how are they sure Sree would give even 10 runs That was not such a bad over IIRC.Could have easily been frugal if batsmen chose to play carefully(i.e. if they had lost wickets) :hmmm: Nothing in life has a guarantee. It clearly worked and bookies got richer by crores
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now