Muloghonto Posted June 19, 2013 Posted June 19, 2013 ]England have always been one of the strongest at test cricket. Err what ? Always ? You guys were bottom of the barrel alongside us and the Lankans from early 80s to mid 2000s. Even the Kiwis were more competetive on a regular basis than your sorry excuse of a team. Take England out of test cricket and it dies. In terms of rugby, we've been one of the stronger nations. In regards to football yes, but where are India in football? No, there are 10x more test cricket fans in India alone than in England. Last i checked, we still sold out stadiums for test cricket and you guys still sucked at selling out stadiums for Test cricket. India just want ODI's. It's the only format you guys are good at to be fair. And you aren't dominant. You're not like the Aussie sides. You will be destroyed if you make the final. But I don't won't no crying okay. :yay: Cricket is what India wants it to be. You englishmen better realize that. When we say jump, jump. When we say ODIs is more important, then it is so. Without our money you cannot even keep pace with basic property price inflation in the UK- ie, without Indian money, your precious test cricket wouldnt have grounds to play on, such is the dismal revenue generation of english cricket.
vvvslaxman Posted June 19, 2013 Author Posted June 19, 2013 In the last 5 years England has played 16 ODIs in India vs India lost 13 of them tied 1. won 2. Special K :finger: England is one of the *****est one day team of all time. You had to import guys from other countries to make you look like a better team. Your country is so devoid of talent that you had to import guys from an associate country. Then there is always South Africa you can bank on. Endless supply of solid players.
special K Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 England's win/loss ratio in tests compared to India mister. Shall we compare? Not really, it's a bit like comparing Brazil at football to the Faroe islands.
Muloghonto Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 England's win/loss ratio in tests compared to India mister. Shall we compare? Not really' date=' it's a bit like comparing [b']Brazil at football to the Faroe islands. err no, its more like comparing German record to the English one. With ball tamperers such as Anderson and Broad on board, i am surprised you guys havnt won more.
vvvslaxman Posted June 20, 2013 Author Posted June 20, 2013 England's win/loss ratio in tests compared to India mister. Shall we compare? Not really' date=' it's a bit like comparing Brazil at football to the Faroe islands.[/quote'] Your united nations is no better than an associate side without foreign imports :cantstop:
special K Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 err no, its more like comparing German record to the English one. With ball tamperers such as Anderson and Broad on board, i am surprised you guys havnt won more. Not comparable. Because England have beaten Germany more times then we've lost at football. India can dream of such a record against us at tests.
special K Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Your united nations is no better than an associate side without foreign imports :cantstop: Upsets happen. Normal service was resumed yesterday.
FischerTal Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Upsets happen. Normal service was resumed yesterday. yes Saffa in charge led you to victory
vvvslaxman Posted June 20, 2013 Author Posted June 20, 2013 Upsets happen. Normal service was resumed yesterday. Come on.. put up a side that is fully English and then talk. You guys are pouching even Boyd Rankin :giggle: . You are neither no.1 ranked test side no.1 ranked ODI side. Till you get there you have to zip it.
Muloghonto Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Not comparable. Because England have beaten Germany more times then we've lost at football. India can dream of such a record against us at tests. Over the last 25-30 years, we've beaten you guys quite handily enough. Its 12-12 incase you didnt know, for the last 30 years. If you go back 50 years, it is 25-17 in England's favor. Yes, England has a winning record. In soccer according to FIFA, England leads Germany 11-10 in non-friendlies. Again, a close record & slightly in England's favor but definitely comparable. Clearly, your views are influenced by traditional english snootyness over realism or any facts. PS: We dont care for any further back, because of the namby pamby 'gentleman's game' concepts and most importantly, the backfoot no-ball rule, which made fast bowling in seaming conditions ridiculously easy PPS: As far as 'dominating' goes, we've held a 10-4 advantage against you Limeys from 1986-2008. That'd be for 20+ years, we've made a business out of 'crushing' you. hows that for a team and a nation that actually doesnt care as much about test cricket as LO cricket ? I dont think you'll have the gonads to address this post of mine, since as you very well know, Limey's have had gonad issues ever since the Germans and the Japs tooled you fools in WWII.
Por Favor Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Wonder what happened to the Poms para-normal ability to reverse swing the ball in 12 overs. :hmmm: Ever since Aleem Daar changed the ball on the 25th over against SL, I haven't seen the Poms reverse swinging the ball. Thought the conditions yesterday was perfect to showcase their ability, 24 degrees, muggy as per English standards, long dry squares and a dry pitch too. Aren't the pitches and squares no longer dry enough or did they run out of Vaselines and sweets in TESCO?? :secret:
moniker Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 England never cheat. We're the only country that doesn't have match fixers. Without England the whole sport would be pointless. Mervyn Westfield says hello.
maniac Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Wonder what happened to the Poms para-normal ability to reverse swing the ball in 12 overs. :hmmm: Ever since Aleem Daar changed the ball on the 25th over against SL, I haven't seen the Poms reverse swinging the ball. Thought the conditions yesterday was perfect to showcase their ability, 24 degrees, muggy as per English standards, long dry squares and a dry pitch too. Aren't the pitches and squares no longer dry enough or did they run out of Vaselines and sweets in TESCO?? :secret: They Discovered a new use for Vaseline....Applying it as a Hair Gel :dontknow:
Por Favor Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 They Discovered a new use for Vaseline....Applying it as a Hair Gel :dontknow: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Now I understand why the shortage of Vaseline in Ingerland... :giggle:
FischerTal Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 They Discovered a new use for Vaseline....Applying it as a Hair Gel :dontknow: :hysterical::hysterical:
maniac Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 ^^I think Phesal K hates Anderson....Provides us with gems at his expense....first the Reverse Swing and now the Hair Gel :cantstop:
FischerTal Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 ^^I think Phesal K hates Anderson....Provides us with gems at his expense....first the Reverse Swing and now the Hair Gel :cantstop: there is also the better than steyn argument, if you can call it one :cantstop:
Crookbond Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 I agree with Special K. India uses Vaseline (on their d!cks for better lubrication) to f*** the English *****s.
rkt.india Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Okay well if India in NZ in 2003 or so were Greentops, then we've only produced one rank turner in the last decade, Mumbai 2007 vs Aussies.Every other pitch was just as 'balanced' then. Australia: MCG and Perth England: Lords and Trent Bridge. and Sydney as well.
adi B Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Err what ? Always ? You guys were bottom of the barrel alongside us and the Lankans from early 80s to mid 2000s. Even the Kiwis were more competetive on a regular basis than your sorry excuse of a team. No, there are 10x more test cricket fans in India alone than in England. Last i checked, we still sold out stadiums for test cricket and you guys still sucked at selling out stadiums for Test cricket. Cricket is what India wants it to be. You englishmen better realize that. When we say jump, jump. When we say ODIs is more important, then it is so. Without our money you cannot even keep pace with basic property price inflation in the UK- ie, without Indian money, your precious test cricket wouldnt have grounds to play on, such is the dismal revenue generation of english cricket. dont waste ur time and energy in replying to him..he`s plain stupid to understand the points,his aim is just to troll kinda serani type
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now