Asim Posted September 20, 2013 Posted September 20, 2013 http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/video_audio/672911.html?genre=2; One man show for Faisalabad Wolves in T20 Champions League 2013 195/412: 47% of 3 match total runs been scored by Misbah Alone, rest of 53% by other 10 combined 13/13 Sixes for Wolves in 3 match inngs came from Misbah Misbah-ul-Haq scores: 46, 56*, 93* Avg: 195
Jersey #10 Posted September 20, 2013 Posted September 20, 2013 Faisalabad Wolf There is only one. Others are pups...or pappus
someone Posted September 21, 2013 Posted September 21, 2013 Like him or not, but he is very much needed in the Pakistan team.
Mariyam Posted September 21, 2013 Posted September 21, 2013 Misbah-ul-Haq scores: 46, 56*, 93* Avg: 195 How can his average be 195 if his scores are in the 46-93 range?
The Outsider Posted September 21, 2013 Posted September 21, 2013 How can his average be 195 if his scores are in the 46-93 range? Average = Number of runs scored/Number of dismissals.
FischerTal Posted September 21, 2013 Posted September 21, 2013 How can his average be 195 if his scores are in the 46-93 range? 93+56+46=195=numerator He only got out once=denominator 195/1=195 :nice: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
Mariyam Posted September 21, 2013 Posted September 21, 2013 Average = Number of runs scored/Number of dismissals. 93+56+46=195=numerator He only got out once=denominator 195/1=195 :nice: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free Thanks guys...:two_thumbs_up: I wasn't aware of this rule. Doesn't it skew averages in favour of tail enders/ mid order batsmen who may make 30-40 winning runs and not get out, whereas openers could score centuries and get out and yet end up with lower averages in the long run? Strange method. I wish they had this in my school. For aggregate % marks divide only by number of subjects you've studied for.
The Outsider Posted September 21, 2013 Posted September 21, 2013 Thanks guys...:two_thumbs_up: I wasn't aware of this rule. Doesn't it skew averages in favour of tail enders/ mid order batsmen who may make 30-40 winning runs and not get out, whereas openers could score centuries and get out and yet end up with lower averages in the long run? Strange method. I wish they had this in my school. For aggregate % marks divide only by number of subjects you've studied for. Obviously, it's not a perfect method, but the counter argument would be why penalize someone who the opposition could not dismiss in the requisite overs or who was left stranded because the tail got out before the opposition could dismiss him? It's not possible to rely on a single stat or even a handful to decisively proclaim X>Y.
yoda Posted September 21, 2013 Posted September 21, 2013 He did well in their last game, but wasn't he a tad slow in the earlier ones?
Asim Posted September 21, 2013 Author Posted September 21, 2013 Thanks guys...:two_thumbs_up: I wasn't aware of this rule. Doesn't it skew averages in favour of tail enders/ mid order batsmen who may make 30-40 winning runs and not get out, whereas openers could score centuries and get out and yet end up with lower averages in the long run? Strange method. I wish they had this in my school. For aggregate % marks divide only by number of subjects you've studied for. Yeah, that's why the good finishers like Bevan & Dhoni etc had such wonderful averages and I think its a fair rule too.
Asim Posted September 21, 2013 Author Posted September 21, 2013 He did well in their last game' date=' but wasn't he a tad slow in the earlier ones?[/quote'] 1st match they were 3/34 when he arrived, still managed to score @ 135 SR... 2nd match again he had to start watchfully but at the end 40 balls 56 with 5 sixes was a good effort...
someone Posted September 21, 2013 Posted September 21, 2013 Never understood why Pakistan fans hate him so much. He is the only one who is at least doing the job well.
Asim Posted September 21, 2013 Author Posted September 21, 2013 Never understood why Pakistan fans hate him so much. He is the only one who is at least doing the job well. Never understood why every indian fan have somehow assumed that EVERY Pakistani hates Misbah. I had so many around who actually appreciate Misbah more than any other current Pakistani player... But.. its not completely you guys fault either, we all know we had Afridi fans here in a huuge number and obviously any Afridi fan wont ever like Misbah, why else he is an Afridi fan...
Vilander Posted September 21, 2013 Posted September 21, 2013 Thanks guys...:two_thumbs_up: I wasn't aware of this rule. Doesn't it skew averages in favour of tail enders/ mid order batsmen who may make 30-40 winning runs and not get out, whereas openers could score centuries and get out and yet end up with lower averages in the long run? Strange method. I wish they had this in my school. For aggregate % marks divide only by number of subjects you've studied for. now i trust you are a girl/lady.. :) pretty endearing that you did not know about the average calculation.. the calculation is not skewed if you look at it carefully. In tests = it does not matter there is no end to number of overs. in LOI = players who come down the order have lesser balls to score, they will in aggregate face similar number of scoring opportunities in multiple games as a top order bat faces in a single game, now even if they remain not out in a game they wont stay not out in all their innings leading up to them facing similar number of scoring opportunities as a top order bat. Hence it evens out in time. If you want a live example look at players like Ashwin they will initially have better batting averages only to settle down to more realistic ones eventually.
Haarkarjeetgaye Posted September 21, 2013 Posted September 21, 2013 ham to chahte hain mis by agla wc bhi khele
SLICKR392 Posted September 21, 2013 Posted September 21, 2013 now i trust you are a girl/lady.. :) pretty endearing that you did not know about the average calculation.. the calculation is not skewed if you look at it carefully. In tests = it does not matter there is no end to number of overs. in LOI = players who come down the order have lesser balls to score, they will in aggregate face similar number of scoring opportunities in multiple games as a top order bat faces in a single game, now even if they remain not out in a game they wont stay not out in all their innings leading up to them facing similar number of scoring opportunities as a top order bat. Hence it evens out in time. If you want a live example look at players like Ashwin they will initially have better batting averages only to settle down to more realistic ones eventually. Why be so sexist about it?
someone Posted September 22, 2013 Posted September 22, 2013 Never understood why every indian fan have somehow assumed that EVERY Pakistani hates Misbah. I had so many around who actually appreciate Misbah more than any other current Pakistani player... But.. its not completely you guys fault either' date=' we all know we had Afridi fans here in a huuge number and obviously any Afridi fan wont ever like Misbah, why else he is an Afridi fan...[/quote'] Of course, that was overstated. But nevertheless, Misbah really should be last person to be criticized given how he is only one who has played well for the team continuous. He becomes a scapegoat everytime and never understood that logic from various Pakistan fans.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now