Ram Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 Who cares how many 100s Kohli scores (or does not score?) Why does he not talk about Kohli winning more matches for India than Sachin did, in his career. #SunnyBeingSunny.
Jersey #10 Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 No he won't. He'll go into a slump for like 2-3 years and then play a few more games and then retire. This is his very best.
saneindian Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 He gets asked a question on a show "Can Kohli break Sachin's record" What should he have said "Oh no. Forget the record. Lets count number of matches he can win?" Also, do all these "match winner" theorists on the thread consider Inzamam Ul Haq to be the greatest batsman after Don?
India-KXIP fan Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 He gets asked a question on a show "Can Kohli break Sachin's record" What should he have said "Oh no. Forget the record. Lets count number of matches he can win?" Also, do all these "match winner" theorists on the thread consider Inzamam Ul Haq to be the greatest batsman after Don?
G_B_ Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 Kohli is 25 years old (just about) he is 13500 runs adrift from Sachin's ODI runs. Assuming that Virat plays for 10 years and averages a baseline 45. He also plays 30 ODIs on average per year. That should see him make it. Just about. Obviously more than form its a case of injuries for Virat. Sooner or later somebody who plays across the formats for india is going to get an injury. Especially when he moves into his late 20s and early 30s. Realistically Kohli will probably need to play about 13 years from this point.
Brainfade Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 Who cares how many 100s Kohli scores (or does not score?) Why does he not talk about Kohli winning more matches for India than Sachin did, in his career. #SunnyBeingSunny. Exactly! VK's value to the team should be considered the same even if was chasing these totals down while remaining not-out on 80s or 90s. It ain't about the 100s.
vvvslaxman Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 Exactly! VK's value to the team should be considered the same even if was chasing these totals down while remaining not-out on 80s or 90s. It ain't about the 100s. His 100s are a reward for his attitude of not throwing his wicket away after a start. Another thing that emphasizes is what a risk free cricket he plays in the beginning before he explodes at the back end. He relies largely on ground strokes upto a point and gathers momentum at the time.. infact ahead of time. I wish every Indian has that attitude of getting starts, converting it and also making it count.
Lord Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 Why would you jinx your own player :cantstop: . If he is good enough to surpass Sachin that is good for India right? knowing Gavaskar's obsession with Sachin it might well be jinx:--D
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now