gaurav92 Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 Respect for bailey. He is a decent bat and a cool head.
diga Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 Chappell doesn't like anyone who plays with a smile.. Scowl+cuss.. you are in Aussie team
CoverDrive Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 They are making the same mistake they did with Hussey with Bailey. Hussey had really good few ODI series in 2005 and they did not select him for tests. Bailey may still fail but how is he a worst choice vs. someone like KHawaja, Hughes, Cowan who have sucked big time. Chappel is letting his views color his judgement - he had deciding the ODI series is waste so will not give credit to anyone who did well in it. He probably did not even watch it and i just spouting his biased views.
Temujin Khaghan Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 http://mobile.news.com.au/sport/cricket/ian-chappell-believes-australian-selectors-must-look-past-runs-and-leave-george-bailey-out-of-ashes/story-fng7skuz-1226752058225?sv=891e9d6573259f80a7e0e22cda01eaea Facing a quality England attack on bouncy Australian pitches is a far cry from what Bailey has been relishing in India. Batting on pitches that bowlers find as helpful as a Parisian asked for directions in English and against an Indian attack more benevolent than the Bill Gates Foundation, has little bearing on what’s looming at the Gabba and beyond. :hysterical:
Sean Bradley Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 Surely they cant leave Bailey out just because he scored runs on batting friendly pitches and doesnt have an impressive record to crow, it has always baffled me how the likes of Voges and and Hughes are a first choice ahead of Maxwell and Bailey.
carnish Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 Best Lineup for Australia in Ashes: Warner Hughes Watson Clarke Bailey Forrest Wade Pattinson Johnson Harris Lyon Hilfenhous (12th Man)
Lord Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 Best Lineup for Australia in Ashes: Warner Hughes Watson Clarke Bailey Forrest Wade Pattinson Johnson Harris Lyon Hilfenhous (12th Man) what wrong has Rogers and Smith done?
carnish Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 what wrong has Rogers and Smith done? They haven't been anything spectacular to be honest. Test cricket needs batsmen with proper technique and I am sorry Smith doesn't have it. Yes, he is better than some others who played in India like Maxwell, Cowan but he is not test standard as of now. About Rogers, he is 36, averages 35 while opening for Australia. Can't say anymore. On the other hand players like bailey and forrest seem to have better techniques and should very well be tried for test matches.
Lord Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 They haven't been anything spectacular to be honest. Test cricket needs batsmen with proper technique and I am sorry Smith doesn't have it. Yes, he is better than some others who played in India like Maxwell, Cowan but he is not test standard as of now. About Rogers, he is 36, averages 35 while opening for Australia. Can't say anymore. On the other hand players like bailey and forrest seem to have better techniques and should very well be tried for test matches. Hughes has no technique.him opening would be disaster.Rogers is much better option imo. Smith has done well in his chances,not fair to drop him
Old guy Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 Chappelli and an attention seeker? LOL! thats like saying, dexter morgan a serial killer with bad ending ? LOL!
Crookbond Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 thats like saying dexter morgan a serial killer with bad ending ? LOL! Or Cabby and still single plus a virgin, LOL! :D
Old guy Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 Or Cabby and still single plus a virgin' date=' LOL! :D[/quote'] that is temporary situation while other 2 examples are permanent :--D
Stuge Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 I thought it was Aussie bowlers who were more benovalent this series.Fricking indian bowlers get more blame. this idiot chappell opened his big mouth again.He says Virat Kohli can fill Sachin shoes, but Bailey cant fricking fill Phil Hughes shoes. This guy Bailey looks to have strong character which is scarce commodity with Aussie batting these days, I would take him over any other batsmen including Watson except Clarke. yep ,they allowed us to score 350 plus Three times in the series out of 5 matches played .Yet out bowlers get all the flake :|
Scarves Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 Chappelli has a point though. Bailey's FC is pretty shoddy both in Australia and in England for Hampshire (I think). He needs runs here against Queensland. Because there is a chance for Hughes or Doolan to take his spot. England on decks that have movement aren't Indian pitches with Vinay Kumar. They are a lot tougher, so I'm unsure about him and Warner tbqh.
Crookbond Posted November 6, 2013 Posted November 6, 2013 Chappell may have made the comment on Hayden in 1994 when Hayden was dropped for the next 6-7 years! Warne had also made similar comments on Bailey for Test matches and when he was selected as captain.
diga Posted November 12, 2013 Posted November 12, 2013 Ashes squad announced & bailey finds a place .. :--D Chris Rogers, David Warner, Shane Watson, Michael Clarke (capt), Steve Smith, George Bailey, Brad Haddin (wk, vice-capt), James Faulkner, Mitchell Johnson, Peter Siddle, Ryan Harris, Nathan Lyon.
coffee_rules Posted November 12, 2013 Posted November 12, 2013 Good choice, but where are the other opener s/batsmen like Cowan/Hughes? They could have chosen a 13/14 with more batsmen.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now