Brainfade Posted December 18, 2013 Posted December 18, 2013 him to bowl 45 - 50 overs this innings so I can watch his beautiful action for 2 full days.
Brainfade Posted December 20, 2013 Author Posted December 20, 2013 I am just loving every moment of watching Stale Dale sending down over after futile over to batsmen who are not supposed to be terrified of him. Amazingly enough, he doesn't have much to say to the batsmen today.
Cricketics Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Credit to him though. Even after giving all those runs, he is still running in hard and looks like getting a wicket. 2 times out of 6 deliveries. Even Philander does too. That is why our batting needs to be hailed for being consistent today.
Brainfade Posted December 20, 2013 Author Posted December 20, 2013 Credit to him though. Even after giving all those runs' date=' he is still running in hard and looks like getting a wicket. 2 times out of 6 deliveries. Even Philander does too. That is why our batting needs to be hailed for being consistent today.[/quote'] I'll save the praise for later. Right now, I am still pi$$ed off by the "scared," "intimidated," adjectives that were used to describe what the Indian bats were supposed to be while facing him. There is no greater pleasure than to hear the deafening silence of the trash-talking Saffies.
vvvslaxman Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Bowled brilliantly in patches. But Indians made him bowl in unusual areas by leaving him well.
Pagalpanti Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 What a reply from India, 1 wicket to him in 47 overs
NareshK Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Never seen Steyn look so helpless in home conditions. Bowled 47 overs in the whole match for 1 wicket. Still bowled quite well though. Indian batsmen were just superb.
GoldenSun Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Ive never seen Steyn bowl over after futile over and not getting a wicket. India proved a LOT of people wrong today.
SLICKR392 Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 1 wicket. lol Ishant >>> #1 attack. :agree:
Brainfade Posted December 20, 2013 Author Posted December 20, 2013 Bowled brilliantly in patches. But Indians made him bowl in unusual areas by leaving him well. Grind 'em to dust - the art of batting perfected by SunnyG and Rahul Dravid.
CG Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 to be fair to steyn the ball did not swing much,its more of the seam ,I think steyn did not get any magic balls which pitch on middle and hit top of off.The pitch is still decent on the strip but its the inswing bowlers who have made batsman play used the pitch to their advantage.
vvvslaxman Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 I think steyn did not get nay magic balls which pitch on middle and hit top of off.The pitch is still decent on the strip but its the inswing bowlers who have ruled the roost. Every time he tried he went down the leg side and got picked on. If ordinary guys like us know that, what are the odds Steyn didn't know. He couldn't get it right. Whenever he got it right Indians defended him well with precise foot movement.
Brainfade Posted December 20, 2013 Author Posted December 20, 2013 to be fair to steyn the ball did not swing much,its more of the seam ,I think steyn did not get any magic balls which pitch on middle and hit top of off.The pitch is still decent on the strip but its the inswing bowlers who have made batsman play used the pitch to their advantage. Would it be fair to call him a swing-condition-bully, then? Very effective when the ball is talking in the air, not so much otherwise? Ya know, like we call our batsmen flat-track bullies?
vvvslaxman Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Would it be fair to call him a swing-condition-bully' date=' then? Very effective when the ball is talking in the air, not so much otherwise? Ya know, like we call our batsmen flat-track bullies?[/quote'] You cannot call him only that. Probably his outswing can be easily negated in flat conditions. But he has run through sides for fun in various places. Every bowler goes through scenarios where they get blunted. That includes marshall, hadlee, walsh.
CG Posted December 20, 2013 Posted December 20, 2013 Would it be fair to call him a swing-condition-bully' date=' then? Very effective when the ball is talking in the air, not so much otherwise? Ya know, like we call our batsmen flat-track bullies?[/quote'] Well he depends on swing be in normal or reverse.He has extra pace so unlike anderson he is not hammered when the ball does not swing much.I mean today he just upped his pace to 145ks+,knowing he need to strike.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now