Jump to content

India tour of New Zealand 2014


fineleg

India tour of New Zealand 2014  

  1. 1.

    • Yes. Dhoni had enough to him. Time to DUMP now.
      13
    • No Way.
      33


Recommended Posts

Posted
He was erratic.Look at Nzl opening bowlers,They were at the same pace or even slower than him. But they kept bowling ball after ball in the same area...as I said he was not totally hopeless but could have done better as he had got the best conditions in the entire match
keep in mind that was because of the insane strategy in first innings .. in 2nd innings he was easily better than any other bowler in this match..almost unplayable obviously some deliveries would come out wrong but there is nothing wrong with way he bowled in 2nd inning
Posted
keep in mind that was because of the insane strategy in first innings .. in 2nd innings he was easily better than any other bowler in this match..almost unplayable obviously some deliveries would come out wrong but there is nothing wrong with way he bowled in 2nd inning
Yup already mentioned that....He was looking like taking a wicket everytime he bowled in the 2nd innings....very good spell....1st innings he was bad but he is still new so no one is harsh on him....Ishu escaped as he had wickets to show for :haha: but veteran Zak was really depressing
Posted

If you are going to nit pick, you will find flaws in Bradman and every other player. This is a young side and will take time to settle, adapt, learn and become better. They should be given time rather than quickly judging and dismissing them after every game. Many of our fans have a poor mindset of writing off players too quickly which is a symptom of our ADHD generation.

Posted
If you are going to nit pick' date=' you will find flaws in Bradman and every other player. This is a young side and will take time to settle, adapt, learn and become better. They should be given time rather than quickly judging and dismissing them after every game. Many of our fans have a poor mindset of writing off players too quickly which is a symptom of our ADHD generation.[/quote'] Picking a glaring flaw and writing them off completely based on that are 2 different things,I am not writing any of the players off,Just mentioned what I saw.
Posted
Picking a glaring flaw and writing them off completely based on that are 2 different things' date='I am not writing any of the players off,Just mentioned what I saw.[/quote'] Shami - inconsistent and erratic ? Jadeja - tailender in tests ? Rahane and Rohit are inconsistent ? They have each played only 5 games. Shami has average of 27 and strike rate of 47. How is he inconsistent and erratic ? Rahane had a great series in SA, looked good in 2nd innings here before he got a bad decision. How is he inconsistent ?
Posted
Shami - inconsistent and erratic ? Jadeja - tailender in tests ? Rahane and Rohit are inconsistent ? They have each played only 5 games. Shami has average of 27 and strike rate of 47. How is he inconsistent and erratic ? Rahane had a great series in SA, looked good in 2nd innings here before he got a bad decision. How is he inconsistent ?
Jadeja already made a huge mistake in S.A while batting....repeated the same mistake.We went over that in the previous thread. Shami did waste the new ball in this test in the 1st innings,Beleive me I saw his spell.,...I repeat in this test in the 1st innings Rahane well you have a point there,may be hangover from his ODI performance.
Posted
Jadeja already made a huge mistake in S.A while batting....repeated the same mistake.We went over that in the previous thread. Shami did waste the new ball in this test in the 1st innings,Beleive me I saw his spell.,...I repeat in this test in the 1st innings Rahane well you have a point there,may be hangover from his ODI performance.
Really ? Maybe you were just looking for Ishant on the telly and not watching the match ? He bowled 6 overs and gave 5 runs in his first spell and constantly troubled the batsman. He caught Fulton plumb lbw which was turned down by the umpire. A couple of catches were also dropped off his bowling. He could have easily picked 3 wickets. It was Ishant and Zaheer who constantly bowled short and gave away the advantage. It was Zaheer's strategy being the senior bowler to bowl short after lunch and Shami also had to follow suit. He bowled just as well in 1st spell of 1st innings as he did in 2nd innings.
Posted
Bring Rayudu instead of Rohit Sharma. I know he hit 72 in the first innings but he does not look like he can win matches for us abroad.
And who exactly looks like winning matches for us? :headshake:
Posted
He bowled 6 overs and gave 5 runs in his first spell and constantly troubled the batsman. He caught Fulton plumb lbw which was turned off. A couple of catches were also dropped off his bowling. He could have easily picked 3 wickets.
All I saw was we had the best bowling conditions of all 4 innings.I saw NZL opening bowlers land ball after ball in the corridor of unceratainty which neither Zak or shami did. Just because he bowled 2-3 beauties and created chances doesn't mean he was perfect. ANyways Martin Crowe, Gavaskar and the NZL commentrators agreed that India wasted the new ball.Also it is not ODI cricket,New ball pressure lasts upto 20 overs in a test match. If it makes you feel better....Shami was not piss poor jeez, but those were dream conditions for any bowler and Ishant whom I said was non-threatening picked up the first 2 wickets
Posted
Jadeja already made a huge mistake in S.A while batting....repeated the same mistake.We went over that in the previous thread. Shami did waste the new ball in this test in the 1st innings,Beleive me I saw his spell.,...I repeat in this test in the 1st innings Rahane well you have a point there,may be hangover from his ODI performance.
All I can say is that you must have dozed off and dreamed of a bad first spell from Shami in the first innings. He gave away just 5 runs in 6 overs and should have had atleast 2 wickets. A plumb lbw was not given and a simple catch dropped. I am not even considering the multiple plays and misses. Plus, he hit the batters twice on the body with good short balls which creates a psychological impact. An expensive spell later on was because of the continuous short ball strategy that the team employed deliberately but the pitch turned out to be unfavourable for that. While talking about Ishant's six wickets, all the NZ commentators could talk of was Shami deserved more wickets and was the pick of the Indian bowlers.
Posted

Ishant picks wickets whenever you write him off? Lol he's written off always so by that he should be picking wickets in each and every match he plays.

Posted
great game for him ..this is why i prefer neutral matches as you are able to appreciate performance from both sides.. in this game i was busy cursing him more :rofl:
Typical fangirl.
Posted

Wonderful bowler whop gives everything when he bowls. Ther are a few bowlers who bowl like this - Siddle, Mclaren. Bowled well around the wicket to right handers, created an awkward angle.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...