Jump to content

Cricket Australia Decisions


Recommended Posts

Posted

Often, we don't mention the selectors and the board who are unsung heroes in this Australian revival. CA made one big mistake by getting in a mickey arthur. They also recognised it. Team looked completely down and out for the count during the last tour of India. 2 weeks before the ashes in England they sacked Arthur and appointed Lehman. Bold move. At the risk of jeopardising the entire series, they took a decision. Australia played better than the 3-0 score line. But it was a happier dressing room Then the ODI series in India. Johnson seemed to have got his mojo back in IPL and India series. CA got him back before the last and decider match of the series to be ready for the ashes. Again inspired decision. Australia whitewashes England. However, that still does not solve the issues of batting which CA knows could be found out in SA. They select Doolan who doesn't have the greatest domestic record in the world, but they senses that he is the right guy. Doolan comes in, plays to important knocks in the first test and takes two great catches. Inspired selection to get Shaun marsh back in the line up, who scores a 100 in 1st innings to set the game up. Just saying that not a lot has changed in 1 year. It is just the cricketing sense and courage of decision makers that has triggered or supported revival of this Australian team. We keep getting whitewashed series after series and I see nothing happening.

Posted
I will distribute laddos at my workplace when Fletcher's tenure ends. He has been worse than Arthur was for Aus and has still managed to hang around for 3 years with no end in sight :sad:
Yeah, I think Moody is right guy for us. But I am not sure if India's problems can be simply solved by coach. There is BCCI interference. Players distracted. IPL. Media. The whole package is difficult.
Posted
Yeah' date=' I think Moody is right guy for us. But I am not sure if India's problems can be simply solved by coach. There is BCCI interference. Players distracted. IPL. Media. The whole package is difficult.[/quote'] I do agree with you here. Australia is the most successful cricketing nation on the planet - highest Test win/loss ratio, four World Cups. By contrast India are seventh out of eight competitive teams in Test cricket. Away from home we are absolutely pathetic. Aus have produced some of the most fearsome bowlers ever. In our country a guy like Zaheer, who would struggle to make it to most Aussie teams with his average of 33, is hailed as a superstar. Not hating on Zaheer here, but he is an adequate bowler at best at the highest level but for us he is the second most successful seamer in a population of 1 billion people. For India to become a dominant Test team will require wholesale changes to the cricket structure. But our primary goal is to make as much cash as is humanly possible out of tamasha IPL. With that goal in mind, India will continued to be tossed around like a ***** in Test cricket with impotent bowlers who nobody fears.
Posted
Yeah' date=' I think Moody is right guy for us. But I am not sure if India's problems can be simply solved by coach. There is BCCI interference. Players distracted. IPL. Media. The whole package is difficult.[/quote'] I would go with Stephen Fleming as a coach than Moody. Somehow former left handed top order batsmen have worked pretty well for us as coaches :smiley:
Posted
I would go with Stephen Fleming as a coach than Moody. Somehow former left handed top order batsmen have worked pretty well for us as coaches :smiley:
what about Jayasuriya then :hmmm:
Posted

We need a proper bowling coach more than anything. Tbh our batting post 0-8 era away has been on the rise. This young unit held up well in SA and is going to win the first overseas test in a long time on a green pitch. Its the bowlers that have always lost us games. Hire someone like Waqar/Donald/Lee. Make our bowlers look for wickets rather then settling for line+length bowling. Even NZ bowling is on the rise after they hired Donald and now Bond.

Posted

They are run in a professional manner where the performance matters to them unlike ours who are power hungry and more concerned with $$$$$ than the way we are being hammered abroad. We have a chairman who is corrupt to the core plus for him winning at home is more important than winning at overseas as he believes that home team is always stronger.The ACB and ECB are run more professionally than the BCCi. Sent from my Micromax A110 using Tapatalk

Posted
They are run in a professional manner where the performance matters to them unlike ours who are power hungry and more concerned with $$$$$ than the way we are being hammered abroad. We have a chairman who is corrupt to the core plus for him winning at home is more important than winning at overseas as he believes that home team is always stronger.The ACB and ECB are run more professionally than the BCCi. Sent from my Micromax A110 using Tapatalk
Yup and it shows why they are the best cricketing nation on the planet. They take losses seriously and here Fletcher got his contract extended after going 0-8 :haha:
Posted

Some more gun decisions :- 1.Remove Siddle whose pace was slagging off. Yes break the trio which has won 6 out of 7 tests 2. Bring in Pattinson for his pace and hasn't played a test for a while 3.Remove Marsh who played the innings to win the first test And did I mention, selecting Warner as opener. Whoever did that couple of years back, really took a very risky decision. Needless to say it has paid off.

Posted
Some more gun decisions :- 1.Remove Siddle whose pace was slagging off. Yes break the trio which has won 6 out of 7 tests 2. Bring in Pattinson for his pace and hasn't played a test for a while 3.Remove Marsh who played the innings to win the first test And did I mention, selecting Warner as opener. Whoever did that couple of years back, really took a very risky decision. Needless to say it has paid off.
those are coaching decisions not cricket australia calls. At the end of the day it appears that the team batting first won.
Posted
those are coaching decisions not cricket australia calls. At the end of the day it appears that the team batting first won.
Coaches don't take that decision on their in Australia. It is selector's call.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...