Jump to content

Speeds and Performances of Pacers and Spinners

express bowling

By express bowling
in Cricket Talk

Recommended Posts

the don Veteran

the don

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, express bowling said:

The first 24 overs of this match showed that the Pakistan pace attack is being over-rated. They play too many matches against minnows and this has helped them build a reputation that is bigger than their ability. 

 

Our batters should always look to attack them like today and not be too cautious in their approach   

Gotta love premature posts like this.

Quite likely that the indian team might face the same bowlers in the final and just as likely to get blown away. Saw a similar thing being said a month back in that Rana, Hangargekar wala tournament. 

Sgattick10 Grand Master

Sgattick10

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, the don said:

Gotta love premature posts like this.

Quite likely that the indian team might face the same bowlers in the final and just as likely to get blown away. Saw a similar thing being said a month back in that Rana, Hangargekar wala tournament. 

Well acc to commentators Rohit is the first batsman to hit Shaheen for a 6 in his first over.. Shaheen understood the diff between bowling to boys vs man, Gill smashed him as well. Only thing is Indian batters don't play Pak regularly hence the mystery .. Rohit's batting against left arm pacers is dismal yet he took Shaheen on and out of the attack. 

express bowling Grand Master

express bowling

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, the don said:

Gotta love premature posts like this.

Quite likely that the indian team might face the same bowlers in the final and just as likely to get blown away.

 

It can happen and if it happens then it would be due to Indian batters' inability to handle pressure. For the last 10 years, crumbling in the knock out matches has been a regular feature of this Indian batting lineup irrespective of the quality of bowling. 

 

But matches like today show that the quality of this Pakistani pace attack is overrated and can be dominated if attacked.

 

If I were a Pakistani ( thankfully I am not ), I would have been unhappy with their pace attack today. It is better to be realistic  than being a cheerleader of the national teams. 

 

2 hours ago, the don said:

Saw a similar thing being said a month back in that Rana, Hangargekar wala tournament. 

 

The purpose of these Emerging and U19 tournaments is to find new talent for the Senior level. Only Pakistanis celebrate these wins seriously and send seniors to play.

 

Meanwhile I was very happy that Rana and Hangargekar got to play against more senior players and showcase their potential for the next level. 

Edited by express bowling
msb1991 Apprentice

msb1991

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, MediumPacer said:

Unadkat batting at no 11 and cant get a wicket,Arshdeep played 5 matches and struggled playing for kent in div 1.

 

 

Only saini did well playing for kent last season.

I don't think Saini did that well. Generally very expensive and other than one game didn't take many wickets. 

the don Veteran

the don

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, express bowling said:

 

It can happen and if it happens then it would be due to Indian batters' inability to handle pressure. For the last 10 years, crumbling in the knock out matches has been a regular feature of this Indian batting lineup irrespective of the quality of bowling. 

 

But matches like today show that the quality of this Pakistani pace attack is overrated and can be dominated if attacked.

 

If I were a Pakistani ( thankfully I am not ), I would have been unhappy with their pace attack today. It is better to be realistic  than being a cheerleader of the national teams. 

 

 

The purpose of these Emerging and U19 tournaments is to find new talent for the Senior level. Only Pakistanis celebrate these wins seriously and send seniors to play.

 

Meanwhile I was very happy that Rana and Hangargekar got to play against more senior players and showcase their potential for the next level. 

Exactly, it can happen. I wonder if you were happy with the indian pacers vs nepal in the first 20 overs especially Siraj who was smashed around by Nepal batsmen. Personally i was pretty happy with Naseem. A fifer is around the corner for him.

express bowling Grand Master

express bowling

Posted
  • Author
Posted
28 minutes ago, the don said:

. I wonder if you were happy with the indian pacers vs nepal in the first 20 overs especially Siraj who was smashed around by Nepal batsmen.

 

No I wasn't happy with him but also recognize the fact that he was playing an actual game after a long time.

 

 

28 minutes ago, the don said:

Personally i was pretty happy with Naseem. A fifer is around the corner for him.

 

Naseem looks like the best of the 3 but the other 2 look susceptible against quality aggressive batting.

 

Your pacers are over-rated like our fancy batters.  

singhvivek141 Grand Master

singhvivek141

Posted
Posted

Pakistani bowlers bowled poorly in this match. 

Naseem's stats might look well but yesterday he wasted the new ball...today he corrected that but after going for runs he again went on backfoot.

 

Faheem is bang average...even worse than Anwar Ali & Bilawal Bhatti

 

the don Veteran

the don

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

Pakistani bowlers bowled poorly in this match. 

Naseem's stats might look well but yesterday he wasted the new ball...today he corrected that but after going for runs he again went on backfoot.

 

Faheem is bang average...even worse than Anwar Ali & Bilawal Bhatti

 

If you think Naseem hasnt bowled well. You are clueless. 

singhvivek141 Grand Master

singhvivek141

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, the don said:

If you think Naseem hasnt bowled well. You are clueless. 

See...I am a simple man. For me it doesn't matter if a bowler has went for 90 runs unless he can back it up with 4 wickets.

 

Naseem was given new ball, he stayed wide hoping for batters to go after him and edge, instead of bowling at the off and then moving the bowl across.

 

If you're fine with that approach, then I have nothing to say. For me, its a bang average approach, pure selfishness.

Edited by singhvivek141
the don Veteran

the don

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, singhvivek141 said:

See...I am a simple man. For me it doesn't matter if a bowler has went for 90 runs unless he can back it up with 4 wickets.

 

Naseem was given new ball, he stayed wide hoping for batters to go after him and edge, instead of bowling at the off and then moving the bowl across.

 

If you're fine with that approach, then I have nothing to say. For me, its a bang average approach, pure selfishness.

Would be hilarious when the luck runs out in the next game. Indian top order has been blown away by pak in the last three games.

singhvivek141 Grand Master

singhvivek141

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, the don said:

Would be hilarious when the luck runs out in the next game. Indian top order has been blown away by pak in the last three games.

 

There is nothing luck, its a game of skill l, execution & mental strength..luck has little role here. Indian top order can fail, I am not delusional about it. But what's true is true in this match.

 

You can keep on changing goal posts to avoid the reality.

Edited by singhvivek141
the don Veteran

the don

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MK55 said:

This PAK bowling attack without Rauf looks mediocre. Shaheen has gone down rapidly. And they couldn’t find a better bowler than Faheem lol?

Obviously when Chacha has to bowl 6 overs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...