maniac Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Aaron 2 wickets :hatsoff: This is why you need a guy who can hit near 90's consistently.....Might look ordinary and gun barrel straight at times but suddenly will produce wicket taking balls-Those 5 Yards do make a difference. Really impressed by him yet again.
gattaca Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Good for him but they wont work well on Indian picthes unless you conserve your energy and increase in phases.
adi B Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 i agree.he and booby should bowl in tandem tomorrow morning,one with pace,one with swing,it'll unsettle the english batsmen i hope
maniac Posted August 7, 2014 Author Posted August 7, 2014 Good for him but they wont work well on Indian picthes unless you conserve your energy and increase in phases. That depends how they are used...Under Dhoni may not work but definetely has brought the x factor...Wish Umesh who is much superior to Aaron was in the team too.
ThePhenomenal1 Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Aaron 2 wickets :hatsoff: This is why you need a guy who can hit near 90's consistently.....Might look ordinary and gun barrel straight at times but suddenly will produce wicket taking balls-Those 5 Yards do make a difference. Really impressed by him yet again. :hatsoff: was very impressed. Always looked like taking a wicket, just a little wayward intentionally, i.e. those last 3 balls to jordan should have been yorkers at 88-90mph. Fast bowlers win you matches. You need bowlers at atleast 135kph consistently. Exceptions are exceptional swing bowlers like bhuvi and they are the exception. Even ishant can hit 145 if he wants, now is 135 but should get faster now with improved action. Pankaj needs to step up and get those wickets or he will be gone asap. Imagine umesh with aaron
Lord Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 obviously genuine quick is great asset as long as he can maintain accuracy and get movement.Aaron did that well too today,not just pace.Hope he can maintain it.
King Tendulkar Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 :hatsoff: was very impressed. Always looked like taking a wicket, just a little wayward intentionally, i.e. those last 3 balls to jordan should have been yorkers at 88-90mph. Fast bowlers win you matches. You need bowlers at atleast 135kph consistently. Exceptions are exceptional swing bowlers like bhuvi and they are the exception. Even ishant can hit 145 if he wants, now is 135 but should get faster now with improved action. Pankaj needs to step up and get those wickets or he will be gone asap. Imagine umesh with aaron I have been demanding they play in tandem since beginning of time But apparently we need all out trundle attack
ThePhenomenal1 Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 I have been demanding they play in tandem since beginning of time But apparently we need all out trundle attack better late than never. hope indian fans around the world see this and ishant at lords and say "hey, fast bowling can be fun, good. It can win matches. It isn't all about the batting" Lol dont remind me of vinay kumar Bhuvi is only exception as he has the skills. He has decent pace when he wants to crank it up. Is just saving energy. Needs to bulk up.
maniac Posted August 7, 2014 Author Posted August 7, 2014 I have been demanding they play in tandem since beginning of time But apparently we need all out trundle attack People don't get it....Take a look at Someone like Tait for example that guy used to go for 6 Runs per over in some spells in LOI's but then sudenly would comeback in the middle overs and Pick 2-3 quick wickets which would break the entire backbone of the batting team....The bigger picture is he would impact the entire game. I am not even going to talk about genuine fast bowling greats,That is why I Picked up a real hostile quick bowler who some may say had a below par short career but still was an impact player. This is why we need quicks
King Tendulkar Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 See dhoni keeping to aaron. Didn't like it. Ball hitting his gloves, parried one as well. Really did not seem to enjoy keeping to him Aaron got the wicket and dhoni barley celebrated.
vvvslaxman Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Good for him but they wont work well on Indian picthes unless you conserve your energy and increase in phases. NO need on Indian pitches. Spinner will do the job there.
Crookbond Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 People don't get it....Take a look at Someone like Tait for example that guy used to go for 6 Runs per over in some spells in LOI's but then sudenly would comeback in the middle overs and Pick 2-3 quick wickets which would break the entire backbone of the batting team....The bigger picture is he would impact the entire game. I am not even going to talk about genuine fast bowling greats,That is why I Picked up a real hostile quick bowler who some may say had a below par short career but still was an impact player. This is why we need quicks I would really love to use an example of a player who played 35 ODIs over 5 years and then retired.
King Tendulkar Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 People don't get it....Take a look at Someone like Tait for example that guy used to go for 6 Runs per over in some spells in LOI's but then sudenly would comeback in the middle overs and Pick 2-3 quick wickets which would break the entire backbone of the batting team....The bigger picture is he would impact the entire game. I am not even going to talk about genuine fast bowling greats,That is why I Picked up a real hostile quick bowler who some may say had a below par short career but still was an impact player. This is why we need quicks Look at aussies. Played MJ for years even when wayward, done all they could to back and develop him. Eventually dropped him, then on even the remotest sign he could bowl straight again repicked him immediately. All other teams virtually worship fast bowlers, fast track them and do their all to groom and back them. We get peppered by fast bowers, and worship oppo pace bowlers. But with our own we line up to boot them Meanwhile in India...
Deleted_User_1 Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 i agree.he and booby should bowl in tandem tomorrow morning' date='one with pace,one with swing,it'll unsettle the english batsmen i hope[/quote'] :giggle: Nice try.....but Indian club bowlers will toil all day tomorrow with England building a 300 run lead.
gattaca Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 NO need on Indian pitches. Spinner will do the job there. Thats problem for indian pacers. They get completely ignored on home pitches and people expect them to do well on tours its simply is not possible.
King Tendulkar Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Good for him but they wont work well on Indian picthes unless you conserve your energy and increase in phases. Wrong When England toured and we embarrassingly lost series. In first test we won, Yadav got crucial break throughs with fast balls to get us first test win and was great. Amazingly that was last test Yadav has played for India despite this, as apparently dhoni don't like the way he bowl in nets!! Sack the mofo destroying indian cricket
vvvslaxman Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Thats problem for indian pacers. They get completely ignored on home pitches and people expect them to do well on tours its simply is not possible. Because Indian pacers rely a lot on reverse swing in India. Unless there is a first day pitch offering plenty of movement even Steyn will struggle here. It is understanable. Shami did well in India. But i am going to get a bowler that totally sucks in India but does well everywhere else i'll take him rather than the other way around.
maniac Posted August 7, 2014 Author Posted August 7, 2014 I would really love to use an example of a player who played 35 ODIs over 5 years and then retired. Yeah as I said had a below par career but surely was an impact player when he was in the team....He was a scary proposition in T20's especially where you have even more shorter spells. I am just saying genuine quicks no matter how long they last are impact players regardless of the format.
Crookbond Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 Yeah as I said had a below par career but surely was an impact player when he was in the team....He was a scary proposition in T20's especially where you have even more shorter spells. I am just saying genuine quicks no matter how long they last are impact players regardless of the format. All I'm saying is that genuine quicks are extremes irrespective of the format - it all evens out.
SLICKR392 Posted August 7, 2014 Posted August 7, 2014 See dhoni keeping to aaron. Didn't like it. Ball hitting his gloves, parried one as well. Really did not seem to enjoy keeping to him Aaron got the wicket and dhoni barley celebrated. Barely celebrated? :cantstop: You are a rockstar in making up stuff to support your claims. But yeah, he din't look comfy keeping.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now