Happy Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 It is a matter of utmost shame that people like Imam Bukhari can freely embarrass India time and again... Though it is his personal choice to invite or not to invite Indian PM Modi in d religious ceremony but to invite an anti Indian (Pakistani PM Nawaz Sharif) in the current geopolitical situation, is certainly obnoxious.... I know for sure that whole Muslim society does not subscribe to Bukhari's ideology but people like him (who believe to represent d religion) put salt on d woes of those civilized Muslim brothers and sisters who are seen with d prejudice eyes... If d reason was religious why didn't he invite d heads of all Muslim countries not just Pakistan!
Cricket_Hacker Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 No problem.Minorities must be given extra liberty to indulge in whatever they believe.
Malcolm Merlyn Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 These guys need to be taught a lesson.Respect the country you live in if you cant then leave.
coffee_rules Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 He should invite Dawood and Hafeez Sayeed and we can nab them .
Happy Posted October 30, 2014 Author Posted October 30, 2014 No problem.Minorities must be given extra liberty to indulge in whatever they believe. One is entitled to his or her freedom until doesn't encroach upon some else's freedom ... With rights we also hold responsibilities...he has got every right to like or dislike Mr. Narendra Modi but by no mean can he demean the office of prime minister of India... My prime minister and certainly yours!!!
Sachin=GOD Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 He wanted attention and got it. As for those showing outrage - its not a Govt function so not inviting the PM is not in any way an insult to the office of the PM. Its more of a family business being passed on to his son (the office of Shahi Imam is hereditary) so he can invite anyone he likes.
gslv Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 He doesn't have standard to be acknowledged by namo. Who is he that a PM should care.he can suck upto Pakistani for all I care. Surely it exposes the mentality of many mohammadans in India. They believe in ummah rather than our motherland. It exposes them .
Number Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 Attention seeker. Lives in fools paradise that Indian Muslims follow his orders. His son in law contested in UP general elections and couldn't even save his deposit from a muslim majority area. Where Imam sahab himself went for the campaign. lol.
cowboysfan Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 this guy was the genius who openly told his followers to vote for Sonia and her idiot son and as a result probably polarized the vote even more.
RedFever Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 this guy was the genius who openly told his followers to vote for Sonia and her idiot son and as a result probably polarized the vote even more. True, this is actually hurting the congress
AmreekanDesi Posted October 30, 2014 Posted October 30, 2014 idiot! prolly still has some fantasies of muslims ruling over delhi again how imp is he among the muslim community now? don't remember any of my muslim friends from dps ever mentioning him as an important personality.
Texan Posted October 31, 2014 Posted October 31, 2014 His justification for not inviting Modi was: Modi has not done anything for Indian Muslims even after coming to power. It looks like Nawaz Sharif on the other hand has done lots for Indian Muslims :hmmm: It's a good thing though that Modi is not invited. No point in going for a family hand-over of the family business. Had he been invited and had he declined, all the secular intellectuals would have run TV debates about how Modi lost an opportunity to reach out to minorities and what not.
Raghav_12 Posted October 31, 2014 Posted October 31, 2014 It's stupid to create a news and thread for a nobody like Bukhari who has vested interest in not allowing muslims to progress. But it is equally stupid to declare his stand as anti-indian.
Desi Cartman Posted October 31, 2014 Posted October 31, 2014 It's stupid to create a news and thread for a nobody like Bukhari who has vested interest in not allowing muslims to progress. But it is equally stupid to declare his stand as anti-indian. So I guess the only thing "non-stupid" is to reply in a stupid thread about "stupid" stand of a nobody :blink:
Raghav_12 Posted October 31, 2014 Posted October 31, 2014 So I guess the only thing "non-stupid" is to reply in a stupid thread about "stupid" stand of a nobody :blink: Yeah.. Stupidity is contagious :((
Jason Voorhees Posted October 31, 2014 Posted October 31, 2014 It's stupid to create a news and thread for a nobody like Bukhari who has vested interest in not allowing muslims to progress. But it is equally stupid to declare his stand as anti-indian. why is this on secular media coverage if its a non issue? Trying to provoke people, isn't?
Recommended Posts