Poll: Are you for DRS or not

[CoverDrive]

Tired of comments everytime that you Indians deserve bad decisions as you are not for DRS etc. etc. yes BCCI deserves this but we fans have right to whine about umpiring errors while also bashing BCCI for its stupidity Lets see what is the opinion of people are around here. Are you in favor of accepting DRS using Hawkeye + Hotspot + Snicko using 3rd umpire ? Choice is just Yes or No can anyone put a poll ? My answer is Yes

[Marut]

I am for DRS as long as it does not give any advantages to the team that knows how to use it better. We are playing cricket here (where cricketing skills alone should matter) and not brain games with technology.

[adi B]

100% yes.where is the poll between?

[CoverDrive]

100% yes.where is the poll between?

added now please vot

[CG]

Yes except keep hawk eye out, it's aim was to reduce howlers

[CommonMan]

I am for DRS. Each player should be able to use once they are batting and once they are bowling.

[express bowling]

Strong Yes.

[bulbul]

I am for DRS as long as it does not give any advantages to the team that knows how to use it better. We are playing cricket here (where cricketing skills alone should matter) and not brain games with technology.

Use better ? what does this mean??

[rkt.india]

Use better ? what does this mean??

it should not be tactical, like now. But give 3rd umpire rights to intervene with howlers. Should not be used for marginal decisions.

[bulbul]

it should not be tactical' date=' like now. But give 3rd umpire rights to intervene with howlers. Should not be used for marginal decisions.[/quote'] Tactical means? most of the time batsmen waste review due to selfishness.I don't think its too difficult for a test captain to manage DRS.

[Crookbond]

I am for DRS - not in its current implementation.

[sandeep]

Absolutely for DRS, but it should be standardized in terms of technology and providers.

[Stuge]

Don't use hawk eye ,but use it to prevent blunders ...FFS

[tweaker]

Yes,I have voted for Drs,

[Debutant]

it should not be tactical' date=' like now. But give 3rd umpire rights to intervene with howlers. Should not be used for marginal decisions.[/quote'] I fail to understand this argument. Who will decide which is marginal and which is not. Once there is technology, our tolerance for error reduces a lot. Very soon, each and every decision will be referred to the third umpire just like all the run outs now a days are referred.

[Tridibans_16]

Definitely yes. People against it in BCCI and team management are morons. I am quite sure even they realise they did a mistake but their self egos will not allow them to admit it and go ahead with DRS.

[Tridibans_16]

Can't we see who has voted for what

[Detonator]

^ No you can't :--D

[zep1706]

I am for a decision review system involving only TV replays. IMO that would be enough to overturn the howlers. But any form of DRS is still better than not having a review system at all. So yes.

[dial_100]

yes with 5 options