Jump to content

Are NZ the most massively overrated team in WC history?| Humility is not a one time lesson


MCGGG

Recommended Posts

Posted

They were lucky to win yesterday against a minnow, they struggled against another minnow last week iirc, how will you rate them when Australia make them bite the pillow? Because Australia will go in dry, mark my words. NZ won't make the Semi finals IMO.

Posted

The present team is superior to some of the teams they had sent in recent WCs. Have got most things covered. Mccullum in form at the top, Williamson in the middle order, Ronchi, Anderson in the lower order to give that impetus. Bowling has got variety. Some good swing bowlers, Milne... The best thing going for them is that these players are in very good form. But I don't see them as favorites against the top teams especially after seeing a bit of them in the warm-ups and Scotland. I'll be more worried of someone like Miller/ABD/Maxwell/Faulkner than say Ronchi/Anderson. Milne is exciting but he does not seem in top rhythm right now. IMO Southee's innocuous and there's not much to worry about him. Boult is a good bowler though. Brendon and Williamson are class players and getting them out will be crucial.

Posted
The present team is superior to some of the teams they had sent in recent WCs. Have got most things covered. Mccullum in form at the top, Williamson in the middle order, Ronchi, Anderson in the lower order to give that impetus. Bowling has got variety. Some good swing bowlers, Milne... The best thing going for them is that these players are in very good form. But I don't see them as favorites against the top teams especially after seeing a bit of them in the warm-ups and Scotland. I'll be more worried of someone like Miller/ABD/Maxwell/Faulkner than say Ronchi/Anderson. Milne is exciting but he does not seem in top rhythm right now. IMO Southee's innocuous and there's not much to worry about him. Boult is a good bowler though. Brendon and Williamson are class players and getting them out will be crucial.
good teams obliterate minnows, and let's face it they were lucky to even win yesterday, what happens when they meet the AUSSIES?, Australia don't **** around in WCs, I think England will have their measure as well.
Posted

not really 10 matches 1 loss. Attacking batsman, a good spinner (Vettori), allrounders excellent in the field. bat deep. They are third favs behind Aus and SA. Which rightly reflects their position

Posted

they are a good team. they won against scotland in 25 overs and thats what they were going for. they could have played conservatively and won in 30 overs with 5-6 wickets but NRR is important they are very confidant team right now and not going into shell. real test will be kncokouts and thier tendency to collapse will be tested

Posted

No.. They r second favs behind OZ to win this WC & rightfully so. It was their foolish Run rate approach which cost them seven wickets yesterday when they could've easily chased it down with 2-3 down & 20 overs to spare

Posted

In these conditions, NZ is not over-rated. It is bound to have one or two bad games, and it is lucky to get away with such games against associates. In '92 WC, NZ was simply superb, esp. Martin Crowe, who not only batted brilliantly but his tactics were brilliant as well such as using Patel to open the bowling :hatsoff: (I think Ind could take a leaf out of Crowe's book and depending upon conditions use guys like Ashwin strategically).... Unluckily for NZ, Crowe had to sit out in the SF and things did go that well for them in that game. NZ would prefer to have bad games out of the way in the group stages.

Posted

They thrashed SA (2nd fav after Aus) comprehensively. And buried SL in the 1st game. I hardly think they are massively over-rated. In fact I'd now put them right behind Aus as favs. SA seem off-colour ever since Aus smashed em 4-1.

Posted

Compared to the other teams they still are much better. They are a little dependent on Williamson but they have several other batsman to rescue the team if he fails (which doesn't happen too often). Their bowling is pretty strong and even Anderson bowls pretty well. At this stage they probably have an edge over even South Africa. It is a little far-fetched to say they are favorites over Australia though, but they aren't really over-rated.

Posted

Overrated but not massively. The 92 NZ team won all league matches except one and this NZ team is not as good as the 92 NZ team. NZ generally punch above their weights in WC but manage to choke some where. They will not get past SF.

Posted
Overrated but not massively. The 92 NZ team won all league matches except one and this NZ team is not as good as the 92 NZ team. NZ generally punch above their weights in WC but manage to choke some where. They will not get past SF.
This team is miles better than the 92 team. The 92 team only really had one player of genuine quality and made up the rest with good strategy and the dibbly dobblies. Australia is probably the most overrated team at this world cup.
Posted
Overrated but not massively. The 92 NZ team won all league matches except one and this NZ team is not as good as the 92 NZ team. NZ generally punch above their weights in WC but manage to choke some where. They will not get past SF.
The current Nzl team has probably the best new ball pair currently,One of the most destructive opening or WK-bat's of all time-sing,one of their ATG spinners.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...