Lord Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 Mccullum leaves an impact even with his short stays at the crease and obviously singlehandedly wins games if he lasts longer+ add his 6 hitting ability and him being a brilliant fielder' date='this is comparable to another recentIndian opener but not viru[/quote'] Uthappa?:hmmm:
sage Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 The beauty of Sehwag and Tendulkar before him was breathtaking orthodox cricket strokes at one-day speed. McCullum isn't orthodox and neither is ABDV which takes something away from the spectacle IMO. Sehwag's skill and shot selection was so good it was hard to tell which format he was playing. Ditto Tendulkar. Yeah those too were the best openers I've ever watched batting together. Awesome stuff
Marut Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 The beauty of Sehwag and Tendulkar before him was breathtaking orthodox cricket strokes at one-day speed. McCullum isn't orthodox and neither is ABDV which takes something away from the spectacle IMO. Sehwag's skill and shot selection was so good it was hard to tell which format he was playing. Ditto Tendulkar. Viru's shot selection in test matches was excellent, but not so much in ODIs. He wasn't a feared ODI batsman because he was not consistent. No good team is afraid of a good 30 or 40 but is damn scared of a solid 100 from an opener. Sehwag did not make too many of those, given his test match skills. Sehwag played one shot too many in ODIs. Often he wasted excellent starts. In test matches though he appeared to play too many shots, by his standards he was very prudent and this is reflected in his 50 average.
Vilander Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 Brendon The Beast Mcullum. Picked this from CI..this guy is a beast..
vvvslaxman Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 One area where Viru trumps McCUllum is against spin.
rkt.india Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Viru's shot selection in test matches was excellent, but not so much in ODIs. He wasn't a feared ODI batsman because he was not consistent. No good team is afraid of a good 30 or 40 but is damn scared of a solid 100 from an opener. Sehwag did not make too many of those, given his test match skills. Sehwag played one shot too many in ODIs. Often he wasted excellent starts. In test matches though he appeared to play too many shots, by his standards he was very prudent and this is reflected in his 50 average. There was a time when Sehwag would try to play everything through off side and would get bowled or LBW. Bowl straight and he was gone. That used to be do frustrating to watch. Same story match after match.
GrandMasterSaxy Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Sehwag is more of a decent batsman, BAZ is a slogger (much better version of Afridi) who tend to fail 5/10 times.
Chaos Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 all these wanna be sehwags :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:. Look at their SR's then when they were playin in sehwags time. One guy cruising at 100+sr and one at 78-80. Recently they upped their SR's with pathetic changes to the game. Sehwag murdered with same disdain since he came to play. Now you can put the thread to rest :finger:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now