Cricketics Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 Ravi did u read my post.. post no. 14.. i am sure u didn't Link to comment
Sachinism Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 dont post jibberish crap. We have no bowlers to pick wickets except kumble himself. So grow up we have kumble!! he did take wickets, if india had given themselves enough time, we could have won Link to comment
Sachinism Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 I think Rahul Dravid hit the nail in the head when he talked about arm chair critics, you can't satisfy them. If by chance Pakistan didn't lose more than a wicket and scored 200 runs you guys would be giving the captain hard time saying they sent Pakistan back with positives to take from the test. Kumble has a 5 fer in not much time and that doesn't even inspire you blokes. You wish India did not win this one because Kumble didn't do as you reckon he should have. if pakistan scored 200-1 on this pitch, i would appluad them, coz that would be fully deserved Link to comment
King Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 What ticks me off is "I hope they dont win this match..." Sure you can have your opinion and I would have hoped Kumble declared earlier too but what the heck India batted well in the 2nd innings too and did great with the ball. We aren't even happy with this? We are one bunch of unsatisfied fans. A win would be great but I'll take the series result and the bowling performance in the 2nd innings. It's not the captain's fault the likes of Harbhajan or Ishant Sharma couldn't bowl wicket to wicket. Link to comment
Chaos Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 What ticks me off is Sure you can have your opinion and I would have hoped Kumble declared earlier too but what the heck India batted well in the 2nd innings too and did great with the ball. We aren't even happy with this? We are one bunch of unsatisfied fans. A win would be great but I'll take the series result and the bowling performance in the 2nd innings. It's not the captain's fault the likes of Harbhajan or Ishant Sharma couldn't bowl wicket to wicket. yea great post ravi. The way we batted it all seemed drawn... just like kolkatta. Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted December 12, 2007 Author Share Posted December 12, 2007 if pakistan scored 200-1 on this pitch' date=' i would appluad them, coz that would be fully deserved[/quote'] and we can say tht atleast we tried to give it a shot.. which itself is a good thing.. going for win.. doesnt matter we win or draw.. wat matters is how we gone for an on attack... Thts wat sets aussies and the rest apart.. i know i know aussies have capable players.. a result of 1-0 against this week paaki team doesnt justify.. why did we prepare featherbeds.... Did we atleast prepare a pitch suited to our strength? we were so negative and scared..... stinks really.... Link to comment
chunky_lafanga Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 India OWNED Pakistan in this series!!!!! India should have declared earlier but no way can anyone argue that India did not deserve to win this series. Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted December 12, 2007 Author Share Posted December 12, 2007 India OWNED Pakistan in this series!!!!! India should have declared earlier but no way can anyone argue that India did not deserve to win this series. i was referring to this match n not the series.. Link to comment
Sachinism Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 and we can say tht atleast we tried to give it a shot.. which itself is a good thing.. going for win.. doesnt matter we win or draw.. wat matters is how we gone for an on attack... Thts wat sets aussies and the rest apart.. i know i know aussies have capable players.. a result of 1-0 against this week paaki team doesnt justify.. why did we prepare featherbeds.... Did we atleast prepare a pitch suited to our strength? we were so negative and scared..... stinks really.... exactly mate negative tactics Link to comment
putrevus Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 That is difference between aussies and indians they play every match to win , india dont do that they should have won 2-0 in england but dravid didnt enforce follow on ,here kumble too didnt want to take any chances. Link to comment
Chaos Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 That is difference between aussies and indians they play every match to win ' date=' india dont do that they should have won 2-0 in england but dravid didnt enforce follow on ,here kumble too didnt want to take any chances.[/quote'] dont compare aussies to us in anyway. They have mighty bowling attack, NEVER drop catches and save runs! Link to comment
donkey Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 with bowling attack like ours......i wud have never declared......c'mon guyz only kumble looked like taking wickets...and no1 could have predicted yuvi's magic....we jus thrashed pakistan...its celebration time :yay::yay: bad umpring and bad lights are the biggest culprits :omg::omg: Link to comment
Chaos Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 with bowling attack like ours......i wud have never declared......c'mon guyz only kumble looked like taking wickets...and no1 could have predicted yuvi's magic....we jus thrashed pakistan...its celebration time :yay::yay: bad umpring and bad lights are the biggest culprits :omg::omg: umpires should get fcking butt slapped Link to comment
putrevus Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 dont compare aussies to us in anyway. They have mighty bowling attack' date=' NEVER drop catches and save runs![/quote'] it is not comparing aussie team strength vs indian team but the mindset of people.Indians are happy to sit 1-0 lead which aussies dont . Link to comment
Chaos Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 it is not comparing aussie team strength vs indian team but the mindset of people.Indians are happy to sit 1-0 lead which aussies dont . this was very good decision i still think, but dravid one was terrible in england. Link to comment
zubinpepsi Posted December 12, 2007 Author Share Posted December 12, 2007 it is not comparing aussie team strength vs indian team but the mindset of people.Indians are happy to sit 1-0 lead which aussies dont . Exactly.. This is wat im trying to drive at... Link to comment
donkey Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 it is not comparing aussie team strength vs indian team but the mindset of people.Indians are happy to sit 1-0 lead which aussies dont . if 27 years old dreams were stake I doubt aussies wud have risked it either Link to comment
beetle Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 if 27 years old dreams were stake I doubt aussies wud have risked it either So true....they win so often,for them it is not such a big gamble. Link to comment
jf1gp_1 Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 if 27 years old dreams were stake I doubt aussies wud have risked it either i dont think you remember how miserable they made life of eng player after aus lost ashes . but we arent as good as aussie , wont be for a while so i am fine with a draw and series win. Link to comment
Sachinism Posted December 12, 2007 Share Posted December 12, 2007 with bowling attack like ours......i wud have never declared......c'mon guyz only kumble looked like taking wickets...and no1 could have predicted yuvi's magic....we jus thrashed pakistan...its celebration time :yay::yay: bad umpring and bad lights are the biggest culprits :omg::omg: if we think like that i guess its pointless going to aus with our bowling attack Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now